Here, we look at the story of Captain William Kidd, His Lovely and Accomplished Wife Sarah, and Pirate Mythology. Samuel Marquis explains.

Captain Kidd in New York Harbor. By Jean Leon Gerome Ferris.

By a simple twist of fate that might more appropriately be called unbelievably bad luck, Captain William Kidd, my roguish ninth-great-grandfather, stands today as perhaps the most famous “pirate” of all time. A larger-than-life figure in his own lifetime and the original source of many of the enduring myths of cutlass-wielding sea robbers we now hold dear, the New York seafarer who helped build the original Trinity Church in Lower Manhattan has captivated the imaginations of children and adults alike for 325 years now. Indeed, without my salty ancestor there might never have been fictionalized swashbucklers of the likes of Long John Silver, Captain Hook, Captain Blood, or Captain Jack Sparrow, for Captain Kidd, more than any other sea rover during the Golden Age of Piracy (1650-1730), has done the most to immortalize the association of treasure maps, buried chests of gold, silver, and jewels, and macabre ghost stories—with pirates.

For four centuries and counting, he has been an American cultural icon and the international brand name for Piracy, Inc., with countless books, short stories, articles, ballads, and songs written about him, as well as rock bands, pubs, restaurants, streets, and hotels named after him. Because of his villainous reputation and pivotal role in the creation of buried-treasure mythology, he was a favorite of such literary titans as Washington Irving, Edgar Allan Poe, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Robert Louis Stevenson, as well as pirate artist Howard Pyle and prominent New Yorker and U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. Today, there are hundreds of websites on Captain Kidd, including more than a few with helpful tips on where plucky treasure hunters can find his long-lost fortune. In the U.S. alone, legend still places buried chests of Captain Kidd’s treasure in a multitude of locations not only in New York but Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Maine. Because of our enduring fascination with both the man and myth, he has secured his place in the pantheon of American folk heroes as our maritime Kit Carson and Jesse James.

However, while many people have heard of the swashbuckling “Captain Kidd the arch-Pyrate,” few know that he was not only a towering war hero as a lawful private naval commander, or privateer, in King William’s War between England and France (1689-1697), but one of early colonial New York’s most esteemed citizens, who hobnobbed with colonial governors and the merchant elite. But even less well known is that he was married to one of the city’s most dazzling socialites on Manhattan Island, Sarah Bradley Kidd, a larger-than-life figure in her own right. In fact, the romance between William and Sarah Kidd is one of the greatest New York love stories of all time.

ΨΨΨ

Born in 1654, William Kidd was an educated man who could read and write and trace his roots to a humble, upstanding, and loving Protestant Christian family hailing from Soham Parish, Cambridgeshire, England. However, he was also a restless and adventurous soul, who went away at an early age to sea as a cabin boy from the port town of Dundee, Scotland, and knew only the life of a mariner. Considering himself as much a Scotsman and colonial American as an Englishman despite his ultimate English lineage, he served as an English privateer against the Spanish, or “buccaneer” as they were called by the English in the West Indies, and occasional merchant seaman throughout the 1670s and 1680s. Trained in mathematics and navigation, he sailed extensively to and from the Caribbean, the American colonies, the metropole of London, and quite possibly the South Sea, which we know today as the Pacific Ocean.

Though free-spirited and bacchanalian, the buccaneers were licensed, government-sanctioned privateers not outlaw pirates plundering the ships of all nations indiscriminately. Privateering as a respectable seafaring profession for both patriotism and profit has existed at least as far back as the Roman Republic, and privateering ships and the privateersmen who manned them (both are referred to as “privateers”) served the function of an auxiliary, cost-free navy that were recruited, commissioned, and unleashed upon the enemy under government-issued letters of marque and reprisal when the resources of combatant European nations were overextended. During Kidd’s early career as a duly licensed Caribbean buccaneer, he plundered the Spanish on land and by sea along the coast of Central and South America and in the Gulf of Mexico and West Indies —not only to earn a decent living wage but to patriotically weaken Spain’s grip in the New World. But he was no outlaw pirate.

The buccaneers’ lifestyle was built upon a modern-like, egalitarian political framework. Their homegrown system of direct democracy resulted in a unique brotherhood defined by honor, trust, integrity, and lending a helping hand to those in need. It played a huge role in nurturing Kidd’s core democratic value system and well-known generosity. During his later seafaring career in the 1690s as a privateer commander, he employed African Americans, Native Americans, East Indians, and Jews as share-earning stakeholders aboard his ships-of-force, and he went out of his way to help seamen’s wives, parentless children, and his family relations and was heavily involved in community service.

By 1688, Kidd had made New York City his home and purchased several prime real-estate properties overlooking the pristine East River. He could afford properties that today are some of the most valuable real-estate holdings in the entire world because he had made a bundle of gold dust and silver coinage from his respectable privateering activities throughout the 1680s. As a private commerce raider taking richly laden enemy ships as prizes, he had earned far more than the average overworked and downtrodden Royal Navy or merchant deck hand, who typically netted a paltry £16 to £25 ($5,600 to $8,750 today) per annum.

In his own day, Kidd was described as a “hearty,” “lusty,” and “mighty” warrior of “unquestioned courage and conduct in sea affairs,” as well as a man of exceptional physical strength and skill in swordsmanship. Taking part in an occupation where violent hand-to-hand combat was the norm rather than the exception, the tall, robustly built, and pugnacious colonial English-American felt no qualms about killing a sworn enemy in close quarters with sharpened steel and snarling lead pistol shot. He was, in essence, a seventeenth-century U.S. Navy Seal.

History has not revealed to us the exact date or circumstances that the rough-and-tumble buccaneer William Kidd and the charming, comely, and very-much-married Sarah Bradley Cox first laid eyes upon one another—but circumstantial evidence points to the year 1688 as the likely starting point. In this historic year that marked the joint ascension of the Dutch Prince William of Orange and his English wife Princess Mary Stuart to the English throne in the Glorious Revolution, thereby securing a Protestant succession, Kidd was thirty-three years of age and had recently made New York his home port. Meanwhile, at this time, the woman who would soon be the love of his life was an eighteen-year-old English mistress, who had attained elevated social station through her marriage to an elderly, wealthy flour merchant and city alderman of Dutch descent named William Cox. By hook and by crook, William Kidd and the “lovely and accomplished” Sarah would find a way to be together as far more than just friends—while she was married to William Cox.

Historians have long been intrigued with Sarah Bradley, the woman who stood resolutely by Captain Kidd when he was fighting for his life as an accused pirate, and yet little is known about her. Born in England in 1670, she was brought to New York in 1684 at the tender age of fourteen by her father Captain Samuel Bradley Sr., along with her two younger brothers, Samuel, Jr. and Henry. Sarah’s family was by no means rich, but the recently widowed Captain Bradley was wealthy enough to pay for the passage for himself and his three children, and Sarah brought with her a substantial 114-ounce silverware collection, a sign of modest wealth and substance at the time.

To secure his daughter’s future and a position in New York polite society for the Bradley family, within a year of their arrival to the New World the captain partnered with the wealthy merchant William Cox and arranged a marriage between his daughter and the anglicized Dutchman. Sarah and Cox, a man two and a half times her age, were married on April 17, 1685, but he died a mere four years later, on August 1689, in a bizarre drowning accident off Staten Island. At the time of Cox’s death, Kidd was in the West Indies fighting the French in King William’s War as a privateer and making a name of himself as a combat hero. Within a year after Sarah had met Kidd in 1688, the two had begun a clandestine romantic relationship that resulted in a son born out of wedlock several months after Cox’s death. Due to the moral and religious constraints of the age, the future Mr. and Mrs. Captain Kidd gave their infant son William up for adoption to Kidd’s aunt Margaret Ann Kidd Wilson living in Calvert, Maryland.

Unfortunately for Sarah, following Cox’s drowning, his estate was swiftly tied up in bureaucratic red tape by Jacob Leisler, the acting lieutenant governor of New York province, and his political cronies at City Hall, who desperately needed money to finance William III’s expensive war against France. The German-born, militant Calvinist Protestant was a New York merchant, former militia officer, and the leader of Leisler’s Rebellion. After seizing power in June 1689 in the name of William and Mary and the Glorious Revolution, Leisler held office as acting lieutenant governor until March 1691, when Kidd returned to New York to play a pivotal role in his removal from power and to take Sarah as his lawfully wedded wife.

Due to her difficult circumstances and with Kidd away fighting the French in the Caribbean, Sarah briefly took a second husband, a Dutch merchant named John Oort, in 1690. Sarah and Oort were married less than a year when he died suddenly and unexpectedly on May 14, 1691, of unknown causes—and two days later she married Captain Kidd. As a two-time widow, Sarah would have been left alone again at age twenty and heavily in debt, but before Oort’s body had even gone cold she and Kidd tied the knot and thus began one of the New York’s greatest, most romantic, and swashbuckling marriages of all time.

ΨΨΨ

The wedding of Mr. and Mrs. Captain Kidd was celebrated on May 16, 1691, the same day that Jacob Leisler was hung and beheaded for treason. The ceremony took place inside the Dutch-built Fort William church at the southern tip of Manhattan Island near present-day Battery Park, where Anglican services were held at the time. Following his return to New York in early March, Captain Kidd’s star had risen quickly as a lawful privateer and community leader. He had swiftly secured a position in the inner circle of the city’s economic and political elite by playing a key role in taking down Leisler, who had proven to be a corrupt, incompetent, and despotic colonial administrator. In fact, the war hero Captain Kidd was so highly regarded as a member of New York polite society that the municipal clerk listed the sea captain’s occupation as “Gent” for gentleman instead of “mariner” on the marriage license. That must have brought a grin to the rough-and-tumble buccaneer who had pillaged and plundered all across the Caribbean and Spanish Main.

Although their affection for one another was the driving force behind their marriage, their love match proved to be beneficial to both parties and Kidd brought Sarah immediate financial security. Not only did he possess several valuable real-estate properties from his privateering cruises over the past two decades, he owned his own formidable 16-gun privateering and merchant ship, the Antigua, given to him by Christopher Codrington, the English governor of the Leeward Islands, as a reward for his bold military service on behalf of the Crown in the Caribbean. He had also been rewarded by New York’s royal governor, Richard Sloughter, and the governor’s council with a substantial amount of money for his privateering efforts in forcing Leisler’s surrender and for a libel case involving the merchant ship Pierre, which had been unlawfully condemned by Leisler in Vice-Admiralty court.

That summer, Captain Kidd headed out to sea once again with a commission signed by Governor Sloughter to battle French privateers sneaking down from Canada to wreak havoc in Long Island Sound and along the New England coast. When he returned to New York in August with an enemy warship as a prize along with her valuable cargo, his reunion with Sarah was a joyous one. Hundreds of New Yorkers turned out with her, her father Captain Bradley, and her brothers Samuel and Henry from the docks, rocky coastline, and oyster-shell-strewn beaches to greet the heroic seafaring commander guarding their coasts from French attack and capturing enemy prizes.

Soon after his return, Kidd made the transition from serving “His Majesty’s forces and good subjects” as a licensed privateer to full-time merchant sea captain. The former buccaneer, now closing in on his thirty-seventh birthday, agreed to “settle down” at the request of his wife, who wanted him to spend more time at home. In a chauvinistic age when a husband could legally beat his spouse with no consequences, Kidd was passionately in love with Sarah and not only listened to her but dutifully obeyed her. As a self-made gentleman hobnobbing with the wealthiest New Yorkers along with his young socialite wife, he now turned away from dangerous privateering missions and towards lucrative commerce on short, reasonably safe trading voyages to the English and Dutch West Indies he knew so well.

For the next five years, the Kidds lived the most placid and domestically fulfilling part of their lives. During this halcyon time, William and Sarah enjoyed the birth of their two daughters, Elizabeth in 1692 and little Sarah in 1694, and they were finally together much more than they were apart. It was during these years that they became Manhattan’s most dazzling married couple.

ΨΨΨ

Though William and Sarah had been born mere “commoners” in England, by the fall of 1694 they were not only living the American Dream but wining and dining with the Philipses, Nicolls, Van Cortlandts, Emotts, Bayards, Livingstons, Grahams, and others from Manhattan’s most well-respected families. Enjoying his ongoing success as a Caribbean trader and having recovered Sarah’s rightful inheritance with the settling of John Oort’s estate, the widely known, well-liked, and reputable Captain Kidd stood as one of the wealthiest citizens in the city, with his and Sarah’s individual net worth at last combined and under his control as head of household. As a New York man of affairs, he had even recently served as a jury foreman on a high-profile legal trial, and he and Sarah continued to be part of the “English” inner circle in the anglicizing city in the aftermath of Leisler’s Rebellion.

New York at this time was as progressive and cosmopolitan a metropole as existed in the New World, just as it is today. Although the original Dutch settlement of New Amsterdam remained predominantly Dutch in culture and had undergone significant anglicization since the English conquest of 1664, it was the most ethnically and religiously diverse English colony in North America. English language, churches, and settlers made up only a portion of a society that was more than half Protestant Dutch and included French Huguenots, Walloons (French-speaking Protestants from southern Netherlands), Scots, Irish, Swedes, Finns, Germans, Norwegians, Jews, and a large population of Africans, some of whom were free. The mixture of orthodox and moderate Calvinists, Anglicans, Presbyterians, dissident Baptists, and Lutherans to go along with a smattering of Dunkers, Quakers, Jews, Catholics, and African conjurors brought with it a religious freedom unmatched anywhere else in the American colonies. This ethnic and religious diversity encouraged a plethora of viewpoints and made New York America’s first grand experiment in multicultural democratic republicanism.

In the colonial era, the waterfront along the East River separating New York City from Long Island was Manhattan Island’s most coveted real estate and the political and merchant elite lived in the South Ward, Dock Ward, and East Ward. William and Sarah lived with their two daughters in a sprawling waterfront home at 119-121 Pearl Street in the multicultural, polyglot, and eclectic neighborhood of the East Ward. The Kidds’ combined properties included what are today some of the most expensive real estate holdings on the planet, worth hundreds of millions of dollars: 90-92 and 119-121 Pearl Street; 52-56 Water Street; 25, 27, and 29 Pine Street; and the Saw Kill farm in Niew Haarlem at today’s 73rd Street and the East River.

Their luxurious Dutch-style, brick mansion at 119-121 Pearl Street was not only located in one of the most desirable waterfront locations in the city but was one of the largest and finest homes in the entire province. Built two generations earlier by the wealthy Dutch merchant Govert Lockermans, the three-story house overlooking the East River had a high peaked gable roof, scrolled dormers, fluted chimneys, and was filled with handsome and abundant furnishings, including a Turkeywork carpet and chairs, four feather beds, an abundance of silver plate, and Sarah’s homemade English coat of arms. To top it all off, the entrepreneurial sea captain had a special rooftop crane to load and unload trade goods and supplies into a storage room on the third floor.

The Kidd family’s view of colonial New York City, the Great Dock, and Harbor must have been a stupendous sight to behold. Across the East River, in Brooklyn and the verdant green farmland of Long Island stretching beyond, they looked out onto more than a dozen Dutch windmills spinning in the ocean breezes. A stone’s throw from their front door, they listened to playfully barking seals and the soothing melody of seawater lapping gently against the pebble beach stretching north of the Great Dock. Looking toward the sky, they gazed up daily at immense flocks of seagulls and bluebills soaring above fisherman waist-deep in the water unloading nets filled with oysters.

In the afternoons when their daughters were napping, William and Sarah would take pleasant strolls along the East River, down oyster-shell-littered Pearl and Dock Streets, and also along Broad Way, Wall Street, and Beaver Street, past the affluent three-story houses of red, yellow, and brown Holland brick with fancy glass windows and high peaked gabled roofs. The couple would also take Elizabeth and little Sarah to the marketplace the original Dutch inhabitants called Het Markvelt. The commercial district a stone’s throw from their house was always bustling with people buying, selling, and unloading goods. To seaward, the Great Dock hummed with industry and the Kidds looked out every day at hardy White and Black men loading and unloading pipes of Madeira wine, stacks of animal skins, barrels of flour, piles of lumber, crates of munitions, kegs of gunpowder, and casks of dry goods amidst a forest of furled masts.

When the summer heat became oppressive, they would take their daughters up the East River to the cool shade of the family’s 19¼-acre Saw Kill farm located north of the city in New Harlem, where Sarah’s father lived. With their young girls in tow, they took pleasant strolls and picnicked on the spacious rural property amidst green pastures, freshwater ponds, and woodlands of majestic copper beech, oak, cherry, and birch in what is today northern Central Park.

At this time, in the sixth year of King William’s War, there was an explosion of piracy in the Indian Ocean, and New York overnight became the foremost pirate enclave in the New World. The Red Sea Men, as they were known, were some of the most audacious freebooters of all time, preying on the shipping of the Great Mughal of India, Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir I. The Great Mughal’s richly-laden ships sailed annually in late summer from Surat, India, to Mocha and Jeddah on the Arabian Peninsula, where the devout travelers rested before continuing to the holy city of Mecca by foot to pray and trade before Allah in the sacred pilgrimage known as the hajj. On both the outgoing and return voyage to India, the fleet was the richest prize in the East and a magnet for the Red Sea Men sailing out of primarily New York and Newport, Rhode Island, in the American colonies.

Although Captain Kidd would not even entertain the possibility of becoming a Red Sea Man and going a-pirating, it couldn’t have been easy for him to turn his back on so much wealth and temptation. Along with Sarah, he saw the signs of the astronomical riches reaped from the Indo-Atlantic “sweet trade” every day along the wharves, in the shops, taverns, and warehouses, and in the colonial mansions of his wealthy merchant friends and the governor himself. Most importantly, when he looked within his own elevated social circle, he must have wondered what his and Sarah’s life might be like if he did cross the line into piracy.

When he was in port, he and Sarah attended sumptuous parties hosted by Governor Benjamin Fletcher (1692-1698) and the Philipses, Bayards, Nicolls, van Cortlandts, DeLanceys, Emotts, Grahams, and other high-society movers and shakers. At these fashionable New York galas, the men typically dressed in silk waistcoats with jeweled buttons, full wigs, and lace cuffs, while the women wore the latest fashions from London: narrow-waisted, floor-length, bright-colored dresses of silk or satin, with a slight décolletage in the front and padded bustles, which plumped out the backside. They talked about the French and Indian attacks up north in King William’s War and how New Yorkers were secretly providing a safe haven for New Englanders accused of witchcraft; but what dominated the conversations were the stories of treasure chests full of gold, silver, and precious jewels and bales of rich silks pouring into the colonies from the Red Sea trade. In the Roaring 1690s, New York was one of the wealthiest colonies in the Atlantic world through a combination of legal shipping and the pillaging of the Mughal Empire. Plundering the rich Muslim heathens of the East was widely accepted by colonial Americans since it brought desperately needed gold and silver specie into the colonies, thereby helping overcome England’s draconian Navigation Acts that stifled American commerce and the lack of a New World banking system.

By the spring of 1695, Kidd’s ears had been filled for two years with tales of the fantastic riches there for the taking in the East Indies, relayed to him by both returning Red Sea Men and mega-merchants who traded with the pirates of Madagascar, like Frederick Philipse, with whom he and popular Sarah regularly socialized. Hearing these almost mythical stories, at some point he decided he wanted to be more than just a merchant captain making runs for sugar, spices, and rum to the West Indies and part-time privateer pestering the French in local waters.

There was just one catch: he absolutely refused to become an outlaw pirate. So, he made the decision to sail to London on a trading voyage and while there procure a privateer commission directly from the Crown. It was a combination of the feverish excitement generated by the Red Sea trade, his advancing age, his undying patriotism, and his lust for adventure that drove him to pursue his dream at this late stage of his maritime career. He loved Sarah and his daughters and was very happy in his marriage. He enjoyed his new house, his wealth, his wide circle of friends and colleagues, and his stature as a New York society gentleman. But he wanted to take one last shot at a grand adventure, perhaps to recapture the freedom and excitement of his buccaneering days in the Caribbean. More importantly, he wanted to be something more, to accomplish something grandiose and magnificent, and he wanted to do it in the service of king and country. Given the inherent dangers, Sarah tried to talk him out of the enterprise. Although Kidd was passionately in love with his wife, listened to her, and heeded her wise counsel, this time he overruled her.

With Sarah’s eventual blessing, he procured a letter of recommendation from his high-powered friend James Graham, attorney general of New York and protégé of Sir William Blathwayt, the secretary of war and a wheeler-dealer in imperial patronage in London. Graham laid out the case to Blathwayt for Kidd to be awarded a royal privateering commission based upon his extensive skill as a mariner, his bravery, and his devotion to duty as a patriot in King William’s War. “He is a gentleman that has done his Majesty signal service [and] has served long in the fleet & been in many engagements & of unquestioned courage & conduct in sea affairs,” wrote Graham. “He has been very prudent and successful in his conduct here and doubt not but his fame has reached your parts and whatever favor or countenance your Honor shows him I do assure your Honor he will be very grateful.”

In early June 1695, with his letter from Attorney General Graham in his pocket that he hoped would open doors to imperial sponsorship, Kidd bid a teary-eyed farewell to Sarah, their two daughters, and his father-in-law Captain Samuel Bradley Sr., and set off for London in the Antigua with a cargo full of goods to sell and to make a name for himself as a Crown privateer. It proved to be a huge mistake and he should have listened to his sensible and loving wife.

ΨΨΨ

Upon reaching London, Kidd was recruited by a group of wealthy Whig financial backers to carry out a dangerous privateering mission that would make King William III and themselves a bundle of money but was of questionable legality. Based on his sterling reputation, the investors issued him a government commission to fight the French and another to capture Red Sea pirates in the Indian Ocean and they constructed a 34-gun warship, the Adventure Galley, to his specifications. Kidd’s government sponsors included not only the king as a silent partner but Lord Bellomont, a powerful Whig House of Commons member and soon-to-be royal governor of New York, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire; Lord John Somers, Lord Chancellor and Keeper of the Great Seal; Charles Talbot, the Duke of Shrewsbury, Secretary of State; Admiral Edward Russell, First Lord of the Admiralty and Treasurer of the Royal Navy; and Henry Sidney, the Earl of Romney, Master General of Ordnance. Some of the most powerful men in all of England, the five lords of London who served as his business partners were members of the Whig Junto that administered the English government, and they had all been early and steadfast supporters of William and Mary in the royal couple’s 1688 ascent to the English throne in the Glorious Revolution.

Kidd initially said no to the command of the risky venture. But Lord Bellomont threatened to have him arrested, to seize the Antiguafrom him so he could not sail back to New York, and to have his seamen press-ganged away from him by the Royal Navy if he didn’t agree to command the voyage. Not only that, but Bellomont warned that he would “oppress” him in New York when he took office as governor of the province. Kidd backed down. Confidant in his abilities and knowing firsthand from the streets of New York the untold riches awaiting him in the East, he decided to carry out the difficult mission rather than make enemies of Bellomont and the other unspeakably powerful English noblemen, who offered him further assurances “of their support and his impunity from criminal prosecution.”

Kidd’s reluctance to command the expedition was well-founded, for his 1696-1699 voyage to the Indian Ocean turned out to be an epic disaster and turned him overnight into one of the most notorious criminals of all time. By the fall of 1697, a year into the expedition, he and his crew had still not encountered a single enemy French or pirate ship that could be seized as a legitimate prize and they had suffered one disaster after another, including raging storms, a tropical disease outbreak, severe thirst and starvation, and repeated attacks by the East India Company, Portuguese, and Moors (Muslim East Indians). Increasingly desperate to earn some money under their standard “no prey, no pay” privateering contract, a large number of his New York and New England seamen wanted to become full-fledged pirates themselves and plunder the ships of all nations to garner a big score. However, the law-abiding Captain Kidd would not allow any violations of his two legal Crown commissions.

While quelling a mutiny, Kidd accidentally killed his unruly gunner, William Moore, a man with two prison sentences to his name, by smacking him in the head with a wooden bucket. Though he felt badly about the incident, many of his men never forgave him and the simmering discontent aboard the Adventure Galley grew. Following the mutiny, Kidd seized two Moorish ships, the Rouparelleand Quedagh Merchant, that presented authentic French passports and together provided a valuable haul of gold, silver, silks, opium, and other riches of the East. However, while these wartime seizures were 100% legal and he himself never once committed piracy in India, he soon thereafter looked the other way during the capture of a Portuguese merchant galliot that presented official papers of a nation friendly to England (at least marginally).

His seamen sailing separately from his 34-gun galley in the captured Rouparelle seized from the Portuguese vessel two small chests of opium, four small bales of silk, 60 to 70 bags of rice, and some butter, wax, and iron. It was a paltry haul, and if Kidd hadn’t later become such an infamous figure, few would have cared that he had turned a blind eye to his unruly sailors from a separate ship plundering a few foodstuffs from a Catholic merchant vessel crewed by Moors. However, it was technically piracy even though Kidd wasn’t directly involved in the capture. He only allowed the seizure to placate his mutinous crew, which had by this time divided into “pirate” and “non-pirate” factions aboard his three separate privateering ships; and in reprisal for the damage inflicted upon the Adventure Galley and serious injuries sustained by a dozen of his crewmen from two Portuguese men-of-war that had attacked him without provocation months earlier.

The reason that Captain Kidd became such a notorious figure overnight was because of the anti-piracy propaganda campaign of the English Crown and East India Company. Because England had failed to arrest and capture the most dastardly and successful pirate, the Englishman Henry Every, following his 1696 rampage of the Great Mughal’s treasure fleet, the authorities made the colonial American privateer Kidd out to be a Public Enemy #1, even though King William III and his greedy Whig leaders in England had commissioned him as their personal pirate-hunter to earn gargantuan profits for themselves. Because Kidd followed in the wake of Henry Every and the fiercely territorial East India Company considered him an “interloper” in their waters, the English authorities created Treasure Island-like yarns of a roguish, treacherous, and mean-spirited Kidd who never existed because they were unable to capture the real pirate Every and needed a scapegoat.

Despite the numerous challenges he faced during his perilous voyage and a full-scale mutiny because he refused to go all-in on piracy, Kidd miraculously made it back to the American colonies from Madagascar with around £40,000 ($14,000,000 today) of treasure in his hold and the French passports that proved he had taken the Rouparelle and Quedagh Merchant legally in accordance with his commission. However, when he and his small band of loyalists who hadn’t mutinied reached Antigua on April 2, 1699, they received heartbreaking news. The Crown, at the urging of the East India Company, had sent an alarm to the colonies in late November 1698 declaring them pirates and ordering an all-out manhunt to capture and bring them to justice. Kidd decided to try to present his case for his innocence and obtain a pardon from his lead sponsor in the voyage, Lord Bellomont, who had by this time had taken office as the royal governor of New York, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.

But his first priority before sailing to Boston was to make arrangements with his lawyer, James Emott, to reunite with his beloved wife Sarah and their two young daughters in Long Island Sound.

ΨΨΨ

On June 25, 1699, Sarah took in the sight of her husband standing at the railing of his recently acquired ship, the St. Antonio, anchored off the eastern end of craggy Block Island, Rhode Island. He looked strikingly dashing in his waistcoat with nine diamond buttons and chestnut-colored wig parted in the middle and hanging to his shoulders. A moment later, she and her daughters were helped aboard the sloop by Captain Kidd and his seamen. Reunited for the first time in two years and nine months, Sarah gave her husband a welcome-home embrace befitting a man who had risked everything to return home to her and their daughters and clear his good name. The girls joined them in the hugging as the crew hauled up the belongings. Kidd squeezed Elizabeth and little Sarah tight and gave them presents of sugar candy. For the next several hours, the deck of the St. Antonio was the scene of fiddle music and a bountiful feast of roasted lamb and pig, fresh oysters, cabbage, salt, sweetbreads, and much hard cider.

Six days later, Captain Kidd and his reunited family sailed into the Puritan stronghold of Boston, the husband-and-wife team deciding to roll the dice with Bellomont, who by this time had promised his business partner an official pardon in writing. Though much of Kidd’s lawfully captured silver and gold, jewels, and bale goods remained with him aboard the St. Antonio, he had safeguarded a significant portion of his booty with his good friend Captain Thomas “Whisking” Clark, a New York political leader and church vestryman who had picked up Sarah, Elizabeth, and little Sarah and sailed them to Block Island; his old Rhode Island privateer friend, the war hero Captain Thomas Paine; and John Gardiner, the proprietor of Gardiner’s Island in Long Island Sound. He had told Sarah about these critical reserves before they sailed for Boston in case things went badly with Bellomont, whom they both did not fully trust.

It is these unusual precautions that have contributed mightily to the longstanding myth of Captain-Kidd-the-Treasure-Chest-Burying-Scoundrel—with treasure hunters still flocking today to the U.S. East Coast, Caribbean, Madagascar, and even the South China Sea in search of Captain Kidd’s long-lost treasure. The irony is that in 1699 these treasure-burying antics that “would forever affect popular culture’s view of piracy” were performed solely because the captain and his astute wife didn’t trust Kidd’s principal business partner, Lord Bellomont, the titled English earl who had strong-armed him into commanding the fateful voyage and promised to have his back.

They were right not to trust Bellomont, for five days after arriving to Boston and undergoing three separate interrogations by the royal governor, Kidd and his loyal crew members were arrested and thrown in the Boston City Jail. The Crown authorities swiftly seized all of his gold, silver, bale goods, and other assets as well as coins, silverware, and personal items belonging to Sarah and her housekeeper. Sarah was crestfallen, for she now had nothing to live on in unfamiliar Boston or to bail her husband out of jail. She pleaded with Bellomont not to take her and her housekeeper’s rightful possessions that had nothing to do with the captain, but the gouty English earl considered all three of them criminals in their own right. His primary objective was to keep Kidd under wraps and get his hands on all of the money and goods without colonial officials asking too many questions. He hoped to simultaneously secure the treasure for himself and his fellow Whig lords to alleviate his heavy debts and to protect himself and his fellow investors from the newly ascendant Tories, who had targeted the Whig Junto over the Kidd affair, which at this point was the top news story of the day.

For the next eight months, Captain Kidd was incarcerated with heavy 16-pound iron shackles around his ankles in solitary confinement in atrocious Stone Prison. Throughout the fall and winter, Sarah remained in Boston with her daughters, fighting for her and her husband’s rights under the law. With the help of her Boston lawyer and the deputy postmaster, she prepared legal petitions requesting prison conjugal visitation rights, the return of her husband’s clothing seized by Bellomont, and the restoration of her and her housemaid’s belongings illegally taken by the governor. However, Bellomont refused every single one of her petitions and Sarah only obtained visitation rights by appealing to the charity of the sympathetic jailkeeper, without the governor knowing.

With no income to feed herself, her daughters, or housekeeper or to help her husband locked up in Stone Prison, and with Bellomont having reneged on his promise of protection, she had no alternative but to turn to sketchy characters to retrieve her husband’s stashed-away gold. But before the New York she-merchant, socialite, and now fallen woman could take charge of her family situation, she was arrested and thrown in the dank Boston City Jail by order of Bellomont. In seizing her, the English earl had truly sunk to a new low, for he had no reason to toss her into the slammer except to intimidate her. However, she was able to dictate a note from her jail cell for delivery to Kidd’s friend Captain Paine, asking for “twenty-four ounces” of the gold her husband had left with him and instructing him to keep the rest in his custody until she, or her husband, called upon him again. The gold was soon retrieved from Paine, the privateer hero of Rhode Island, by a veteran sea dog named Captain Andrew Knott. Now Sarah had money again for lawyer fees, bribes, and meals for her husband, who for nearly three weeks now had been subsisting on mostly bread and water.

During Kidd’s incarceration in Boston, the husband-and-wife team hatched various escape plots during Sarah’s sporadic conjugal visits under Bellomont’s nose. During one such visit on February 5, 1700, talking in whispers so as not to be overheard by the jailers, they put together a bold jailbreak plan. Two days earlier, the fourth-rate warship HMS Advice, captained by Robert Wynn, dropped anchor in Boston Harbor. The ship destined to convey Captain Kidd to London for trial had completed the Atlantic crossing in five short weeks and, after refitting, would be ready to load him up for the return journey back to England, along with more than thirty other “pirate” prisoners and £14,000 worth of treasure ($4,900,000 today) recovered by Bellomont. When Sarah learned of the arrival of Wynn and the Advice, she went immediately to visit her husband in Stone Prison. She knew their time was running out and they had to make their move.

The critical first part of the escape plan called for Sarah to sweet talk or bribe the jailor to remove Kidd’s irons that had been chaffing his ankles for the past six months. Kidd contributed to the scheme by complaining about the pain in his legs from the heavy irons. It is not certain what combination of pleading, bribery, or sweet talking was utilized, but on Wednesday, February 8, the jailer took off Kidd’s iron shackles to alleviate his discomfort.

Now the escape plan entered a second phase. Sarah’s job was to find a way to enable Kidd to physically sneak out of his solitary confinement cell. The two most promising alternatives were filing through the heavy iron bars or picking the lock, so that he could slip out undetected late at night. There was no time to spare with the HMS Advice having arrived.

They made plans to escape on February 13, five days in the future. This would give Sarah time to make all the arrangements for the jailbreak. At this point, the best option seemed to be smuggling in tools so that he could saw through the iron bars. The captured Red Sea pirate James Gilliam, who had sailed from St. Mary’s to America as a deckhand with Kidd after the pirate-faction had mutinied, had used an iron crowbar and metal files during his attempted escape back in December; however, he had made too much noise and was caught before cutting through the final iron bar at his cell window. Sarah’s second option was to persuade the jailer, whom she knew was a considerate man since he had let her husband out of his irons, to set Kidd free for a price.

Unfortunately for the husband-and-wife team, Bellomont sent an official to check on Captain Kidd at this time and when the gouty earl learned that his fallen protégé was unshackled and moving about his cell, he became irate. He soon thereafter sent the high sheriff and armed deputies to Stone Prison to forcibly collect Kidd and load him onto the Advice. By the time Sarah awoke at the seaside inn she was staying at with Elizabeth and little Sarah, her husband had been dragged out of his solitary confinement cell and shackled aboard the Royal Navy prison ship. It pained her that he had spent nearly eight months in Boston’s two toxic lockups without being charged with a single crime, but she was crestfallen when she learned that he would now be shipped off for a probable show trial and grisly hanging in London without the opportunity to bid a proper farewell to her and their daughters.

Upon learning that her husband was held captive aboard the Advice, Sarah tried to visit him so she could say goodbye. But Bellomont would not allow any visitors. Saddened but undaunted, she sought out Captain Wynn, hoping that he might be more sympathetic. She was able to introduce herself one frigid afternoon shortly before the ship’s departure, just as he was leaving the governor’s mansion.

She expressed her disappointment and distress to the Royal Navy commander that Bellomont was not allowing her to visit her husband aboard the HMS Advice, and especially that she and her daughters were being deprived the right to bid him a proper farewell. She then made a polite request. Despite Bellomont’s ban, could Wynn find it in himself to grant her and her daughters just five minutes to say goodbye to their husband and father, and to send him off with their affection and a letter to remember them by? He was innocent, she pointed out, and he deserved the right to say farewell to his family, who he might never have the chance to see again.

Since the arrival of the Advice to Boston Harbor, she and her husband had decided that it would be best if she, Elizabeth, and little Sarah return to New York and remain in America if he was put aboard the prison ship to be sent to London for trial. Not only did he want to ensure their safety, he couldn’t bear the thought of his wife and daughters seeing him disgraced in irons in atrocious Marshalsea or Newgate Prison, or to see him on trial for his life before a courtroom of hostile English judges and prosecutors eager for his execution and salivating at the prospect of his gruesome public hanging.

Though Captain Wynn appears to have been a reasonable man, his fear of provoking Bellomont’s rage was too great for him to fulfill her modest request. He regretfully informed her that he had been ordered by the royal governor to hold Captain Kidd as a “close prisoner” with no visitors or letters; and that he could not violate his military orders by allowing her to visit or deliver a message to her husband, despite the fact he was under heavy guard.

Unwilling to allow it to end there when her husband’s life was on the line, Sarah reached into a leather pouch, pulled out a golden ring, and pressed it into the Royal Navy officer’s hand. Wynn maintained that he could not accept gifts and attempted to return the ring to her.

But Sarah refused to take it back and pleaded with the captain to keep it. All she asked in return was that Wynn be kind to her husband during their extended sea voyage to London. However, he once more objected, stating that he was unable to accept any presents from prisoners or their loved ones.

Feeling powerful emotions sweeping through her, she took a step forward and gazed directly into the eyes of the Royal Navy officer. “Captain, I must insist you keep the ring as a token until we meet again,” she said, struggling to hold back the tears. “On the day you bring my husband back to me.”

And with that Sarah Kidd walked away and into the pages of history. Not yet thirty years old, she had stood resolutely by her man for the past nine months, sailing with him and their daughters aboard the St. Antonio and living like Hester Prynne in a repressive Puritan citadel that was utterly alien to her. Like her husband Captain Kidd, she had been abandoned by everyone once she became tainted and expendable, including her Boston lawyer who went over to Lord Bellomont, and she had even done a stint in the atrocious City Jail. Yet never once during the interminably long, bitterly cold, and desperately lonely winter did she waver in her support of her beloved husband, or in her belief in his innocence.

A day or two later, on March 10, 1700, the HMS Advice set sail from Boston Harbor for London and the trial of the century, while Sarah returned with Elizabeth and little Sarah to her home in New York. All she and her young daughters could do now was pray.

ΨΨΨ

On May 23, 1701, Captain William Kidd was hung at the gallows at Execution Dock in Wapping, East London. The New York privateer had been tried two weeks earlier at the Old Bailey on five counts of piracy and one count of premeditated murder. Although the piracy charges against Kidd were weak and the death of Kidd’s gunner William Moore had been an accident while quelling a mutiny, it didn’t matter. The courtroom drama proved to be nothing but a sham trial to make an example of Kidd to protect England’s trade with Great Mughal and the East India Company’s profitable monopoly. He had been swiftly convicted on all counts based on the perjured testimony of his heavy-drinking surgeon, Dr. Robert Bradinham, and deserter-seaman Joseph Palmer, both of whom served as the Crown’s star witnesses and received full pardons for their betrayal of their captain.

In the Golden Age of Piracy (1650-1730), large numbers of Londoners flocked to public pirate executions, but the turnout for Captain Kidd’s public execution was unprecedented due to his notoriety and the frenetic newspaper coverage. To witness death up close, scores of pleasure boats anchored close to the north shore next to the gallows, and a huge crowd of more than 10,000 souls packed the narrow streets, Wapping Stairs, and the wide foreshore. The colonial American sea captain—who only a short time earlier had been heralded as the “trusty and well-beloved Captain Kidd” by King William III himself—died just as a blood-red sun set over London Town and the gently rippled waters of the Thames. Four days after he stopped twitching and three tides had washed over him, his soggy corpse was coated with tar and hoisted in a gibbeted iron cage downriver at Tilbury Point, where it would remain for the next twenty years to serve as the English State’s grisly warning to other would-be pirates of the fate that awaited them if they dared disrupt England’s valuable trade relations with India by pursuing the short but merry life of a plundering freebooter.

At the gallows at Wapping, Captain Kidd’s last spoken words were for his wife Sarah and their daughters:

[Captain Kidd] expressed abundance of sorrow for leaving his wife and children without having the opportunity of taking leave of them, they being inhabitants in New York. So that the thoughts of his wife’s sorrow at the sad tidings of his shameful death was more occasion of grief to him than that of his own sad misfortunes.

On August 4, 1701, nine weeks after his gruesome public hanging, Sarah received a knock at the front door of her house on Pearl Street, and a New York official notified her that her husband had been executed in London on May 23. Since Captain Kidd had been “attainted as a pirate,” the official presented her with a signed warrant for the confiscation of her husband’s estate. Under English law, she owned nothing as the widow of a pirate and was cast out onto the street, along with Elizabeth, little Sarah, and housekeeper Dorothy Lee. She promptly waged a fierce legal battle against the Crown, arguing that the properties and household possessions were acquired from her first and second husbands and from Captain Kidd prior to his alleged piratical acts. The case would drag on through the courts until 1704 when Queen Anne finally granted back to Sarah the title to her properties and possessions.

Since Kidd had sailed from Boston in irons in March 1700, she had struggled to put her life back together while living quietly in the city with Elizabeth and little Sarah, but times were hard as many of her New York friends ostracized her. Her only consolation was that Trinity Church honored the Kidd family’s ownership of Pew Number 4, allowing her and her daughters to regularly attend church services in return for her husband’s generosity to the community back in 1696. To assist with the Anglican house of worship’s construction, Kidd had, prior to departing on his voyage to the Indian Ocean, lent his runner and tackle from the Adventure Galley as a pulley system to help the workers hoist the stones. The Kidd family pew was right up front near the rector and bore the inscription “Captain Kidd—Commanded ‘Adventure Galley.’” Unfortunately, Captain Kidd never had the opportunity to pray with his family at the church he helped build in the New World. As one of New York City’s greatest links to its historic past, the latest incarnation of legendary Trinity Church stands today in the exact same spot where Captain Kidd lent his runner and tackle over 330 years ago.

Sarah eventually remarried and died a moderately wealthy widow on September 12, 1744. By this time, she had moved back to New York from New Jersey and was living in her old home on Pearl Street where she had lived her best years with Captain Kidd. Fittingly, she is buried today in the churchyard of Trinity Church on Wall Street in Manhattan.

Although today we know Captain Kidd as one of the most notorious scoundrels of all time, my ninth-great-grandfather was no more of an “arch-Pyrate” than Horatio Nelson or Jean Paul Jones—both of whom are recognized today as national seafaring treasures.Thus, the great irony of the legendary Captain Kidd is that, as historian Philip Gosse declared over a century ago, he was “no pirate at all.” He was, in fact, a progressive New York gentleman, colonial American coastguardsman and war hero, and beloved husband and father who helped build up America’s greatest city and a democratic New World. Together, he and his fiercely devoted and courageous wife Sarah enjoyed one of New York’s most adventurous and unique romantic partnerships of all time during the Golden Age of Piracy.

 

The ninth-great-grandson of legendary privateer Captain William Kidd, Samuel Marquis, M.S., P.G., is a professional hydrogeologist, expert witness, and bestselling, award-winning author of 12 American non-fiction-history, historical-fiction, and suspense books, covering primarily the period from colonial America through WWII. His American history and historical fiction books, have been #1 Denver Post bestsellers and received multiple national book awards in both fiction and non-fiction categories (Kirkus Reviews and Foreword Reviews Book of the Year, American Book Fest and USA Best Book, Readers’ Favorite, Beverly Hills, Independent Publisher, and Colorado Book Awards). His in-depth historical titles include Blackbeard: The Birth of America and have garnered glowing reviews from colonial American history and maritime historians, bestselling authors, U.S. military veterans, Kirkus Reviews, and Foreword Reviews (5 Stars).

The recent collision of the Mexican Training Ship Cuauhtemoc into the Brooklyn Bridge was a tragedy – but it was also a historical collision. Michael Leibrandt explains.

A depiction of the bridge on opening in 1883: Bird's-Eye View of the Great New York and Brooklyn Bridge and Grand Display of Fire Works on Opening Night

If you’ve been blessed with the chance to see the last visually-stunning scene in Martin Scorsese’s cinematic marvelGangs of New York from 2002 — which was a gorgeous time-lapse walk through the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge and the evolution around it through the centuries — then you were no doubt immersed in the depiction of the development of New York but also the changing landscape of Green-Wood Cemetery overlooking the East River. 

Nearly one hundred and twenty people perished during the Draft Riots of 1863. The country was in the midst of the American Civil War — and the Union needed troops. The Army of Northern Virginia had been beaten at Gettysburg — and General George Meade was under scrutiny for not pursing Lee’s Army. General Ulysses S. Grant who would take command of the Union Army in 1864 — however — had other ideas. Grant was committed to win the war as quickly as possible.

No army under a Confederate banner would never again invade of the north. Their attempt at a decisive victory on northern soil to entice European countries like France and Britain to join the aid of the south had failed. The Union Army would utilize conscription to replenish their ranks and not everyone was eager to enlist.

A few weeks ago, not long after 8:00 P.M., the Mexican Training Ship Cuauhtemoc lost power on the East River and slammed into the Brooklyn Bridge killing two people and injuring nineteen. Masts were broken on the two-hundred seventy-seven person vessel but it was successfully determined that the Bridge did not sustain any damage. 

Although the Brooklyn Bridge was designed by John A. Roebling — his daughter-in-law (Emily Warren Roebling) was essential in keeping it on track for completion when her husband Washington Roebling became ill. It would be more thanten years until the Brooklyn Bridge was finally completed and opened. The 43-year old Mexican Navy Training Vessel ARM Cuauhtémoc dates back to 1982.

Back at Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn — which has roots going all the way back to 1838 — when it began life as a final resting place for overcrowded churchyards. It’s nearly 480 acres are home to more than 550,000 graves — including some of the most prominent 19th century families of New York which includes the Roosevelt’s and also famous people like Leonard Bernstein. The cemetery holds both Confederate and Union casualties, as well as Revolutionary Warsoldiers. It’s Gothic Revival Gates designed by Richard Upjohn — provide the warmth of a welcome in the summer months to this day.

For both the United States and Mexico — the collision a few weeks ago wasn’t just a collision. It was a collision of history for both nations.

Michael Thomas Leibrandt lives and works in Abington Township, PA.

As soon as the fire became visible beyond the ship, bystanders from nearby boats and on shore rushed to aid the stricken steamer. One rescuer story that got extensive newspaper coverage was that of teenager Mary McCann, a recent immigrant from Ireland who was recuperating from an illness at the isolation hospital on North Brother Island. Mary ran to the shore and swam out time after time to pull as many children as she could to safety. Reports of the number she saved range from six to twenty depending on the newspaper account.

Here, Richard Bluttal looks at the June 1904 General Slocum disaster in New York City in which over 1,000 people died.

A picture of the General Slocum.

The New York Times wrote about the staff at the North Brother Island hospital, who immediately rushed to aid the beached ship. They not only pulled people from the water using ladders and human chains, but also resuscitated victims and provided medical care. The New-York Tribune described a story similar to Mary’s, in which a hospital employee named Pauline Puetz swam out multiple times to pull victims ashore, even rescuing a child who had been caught in the ship’s paddlewheel.

The New York Evening World wrote about 12-year-old Louise Galing, who jumped into the water with the toddler she was babysitting and managed to keep ahold of the child until they were pulled from the water. The World also recounted that when young Ida Wousky would have fainted, 13-year-old John Tishner kicked his friend in the shins to wake her up. John then managed to find a life preserver and put it on Ida, pushing her into the water when she wouldn’t jump. He held onto her by her n hair until they were rescued by a boat. 

It was, by all accounts, a glorious Wednesday morning on June 15, 1904, and the men of Kleindeutschland—Little Germany, on Manhattan’s Lower East Side–were on their way to work. Just after 9 o’clock, a group from St. Mark’s Evangelical Lutheran Church on 6th Street, mostly women and children, boarded the General Slocum for their annual end-of-school outing. Bounding aboard what was billed as the “largest and most splendid excursion steamer in New York,” the children, dressed in their Sunday school outfits, shouted and waved flags as the adults followed, carrying picnic baskets for what was to be a long day away.

A German band played on deck while the children romped and the adults sang along, waiting to depart. Just before 10 o’clock, the lines were cast off, a bell rang in the engine room, and a deck hand reported to Captain William Van Schaick that nearly a thousand tickets had been collected at the plank. That number didn’t include the 300 children under the age of 10, who didn’t require tickets. Including crew and catering staff, there were about 1,350 aboard the General Slocum as it steamed up the East River at 15 knots toward Long Island Sound, headed for Locust Grove, a picnic ground on Long Island’s North Shore, about two hours away. The Slocum headed out from its berth at 3rd Street on the East River at about 9:30 am with a band playing and the passengers joyously celebrating the smooth ride and beautiful weather. The excursion vessel had been chartered to take the group—almost all of them women and children—from Manhattan to picnic grounds on Long Island.

 

The Fire

As the ship reached 97th Street, some of the crew on the lower deck saw puffs of smoke rising through the wooden floorboards and ran below to the second cabin. But the men had never conducted any fire drills, and when they turned the ship’s fire hoses onto the flames, the rotten hoses burst. Rushing back above deck, they told Captain Van Schaick that they had encountered a “blaze that could not be conquered.” It was “like trying to put out hell itself.”  A fire began in the forward cabin, the steamboat General Slocum caught fire in the East River of New York City, including many children. In the course of 20 minutes an estimated 1,021 people died, mostly women and children.

In the neighborhood of Little Germany families were decimated, many losing a mother and two or more children. In some cases entire families were killed. At the Lutheran Cemetery in Middle Village, Queens, over 900 victims were buried, including 61 in a mass grave for the unidentified.

 

Addressing the disaster

Onlookers in Manhattan, seeing the flames, shouted for the captain to dock immediately. Instead, Van Schaick, fearing the steering gear would break down in the strong currents and leave the Slocum helpless in midriver, plowed full speed ahead. He aimed for a pier at 134th Street, but a tugboat captain warned him off, fearing the burning ship would ignite lumber stored there. Van Shaick made a run for North Brother Island, a mile away, hoping to beach the Slocum sideways so everyone would have a chance to get off. The ship’s speed, coupled with a fresh north wind, fanned the flames. Mothers began screaming for their children as passengers panicked on deck. As fire enveloped the Slocum, hundreds of passengers hurled themselves overboard, even though many could not swim.

The crew distributed life jackets, but they too were rotten. Boats sped to the scene and pulled a few passengers to safety, but mostly they encountered children’s corpses bobbing in the currents along the tidal strait known as Hell Gate. One newspaper described it as “a spectacle of horror beyond words to express—a great vessel all in flames, sweeping forward in the sunlight, within sight of the crowded city, while her helpless, screaming hundreds were roasted alive or swallowed up in waves.”  Although the captain was ultimately responsible for the safety of passengers, the owners had made no effort to maintain or replace the ship's safety equipment. The main deck was equipped with a standpipe connected to a steam pump, but the fire hose attached to the forward end of the standpipe, a 100 ft (30 m) length of "cheap unlined linen", had been allowed to rot and burst in several places. When the crew tried to put out the fire; they were unable to attach a rubber hose because the coupling of the linen hose remained attached to the standpipe. The ship was also equipped with hand pumps and buckets, but they were not used during the disaster; the crew gave up firefighting efforts after failing to attach the rubber hose.   The crew had not practiced a fire drill that year, and the lifeboats were tied up and inaccessible. (Some claim they were wired and painted in place.) 

Survivors reported that the life preservers were useless and fell apart in their hands, while desperate mothers placed life jackets on their children and tossed them into the water, only to watch in horror as their children sank instead of floating. Most of those on board were women and children who, like most Americans of the time, could not swim; victims found that their heavy wool clothing absorbed water and weighed them down in the river.

Passengers trampled children in their rush to the Slocum‘s stern. One man, engulfed in flames, leaped over the port side and shrieked as the giant paddle wheel swallowed him. Others blindly followed him to a similar fate. A 12 year-old boy shimmied up the ship’s flagstaff at the bow and hung there until the heat became too great and he dropped into the flames. Hundreds massed together, only to bake to death. The middle deck soon gave way with a terrific crash, and passengers along the outside rails were jolted overboard. Women and children dropped into the choppy waters in clusters. In the mayhem, a woman gave birth—and when she hurled herself overboard, her newborn in her arms, they both perished.

The captain beached the burning vessel on North Brother Island, but the stern of the ship, where most of the passengers had been forced by the fire, was left in ten to thirty feet  of water. Though there were life preservers  and lifeboats aboard, poor maintenance and neglect had made many of them useless. 

Unlike the Titanic which sank eight years later, where the crew was organized and disciplined in evacuating the ship, most of the Slocum crew of thirty six men pushed passengers out of the way and abandoned ship. The crew had never been trained in a fire drill and the few lifeboats on board were never lowered – they were wired down.

The panicked passengers were left to fend for themselves. The life preservers were strapped to the ceiling of the ship’s deck and were out of reach of many of the women and children. Those who could grab a life preserver had a nasty surprise waiting for them.

The Slocum and its life preservers had “passed inspection” only weeks before, without ever actually being checked. In reality the life preservers were rotten – filled with dried, pulverized cork.

When some passengers tried putting them on, they disintegrated in their hands. Others  who managed to jump into the water wearing the “good” life preservers, sank like a boulder was weighted around them.

Not only was the pulverized cork filling of the life preservers waterlogged without an iota of buoyancy, it seems some of the life preservers had metal weights added to them to bring their weight specifications up to standards. Fire hoses of the cheapest kind were also rotten from age and neglect, ruptured when activated and were rendered useless.

Women who strapped life preservers onto their children and tossed their small, loved ones overboard, watched in horror as they disappeared without ever coming back to the surface.

Weighed down by their heavy clothing and struggling against a strong tide, 400-600 passengers drowned after the ship was beached. Though estimates vary, a government report commission  into the disaster reported 955 passenger deaths—or about 70 percent.

Van Shaick was believed to be the last person off the Slocum when he jumped into the water and swam for shore, blinded and crippled. He would face criminal charges for his ship’s unpreparedness and be sentenced to 10 years in prison; he served four when he was pardoned by President William Howard Taft on Christmas Day, 1912.

 

Aftermath

 Within an hour, 150 bodies were stretched out on blankets covering the lawn and sands of North Brother Island. Most of them were women. One was still clutching her lifeless baby, who was “tenderly taken out of her arms and laid on the grass beside her.” Rescued orphans of 3, 4 and 5 years old milled about the beach, dazed. Hours would pass before they could leave the island, many taken to Bellevue Hospital to treat wounds and await the arrival of grief-stricken relatives.

At Riverside Hospital on North Brother Island, where patients with typhoid and other contagious diseases had been quarantined, staff spotted the burning vessel approaching and quickly prepared the hospital’s engines and hoses to pump water, hoping to douse the flames. The island’s fire whistle blew and dozens of rescuers moved to the shore. Captain Van Schaick, his feet blistering from the heat below, managed to ground the Slocum sideways about 25 feet from shore. Rescuers swam to the ship and pulled survivors to safety. Nurses threw debris for passengers to cling to while others tossed ropes and life preservers. Some nurses dove into the water themselves and pulled badly burned passengers to safety. Still, the heat from the flames made it impossible to get close enough as the Slocum became engulfed from stem to stem.

Since there was no manifest of passengers the final death toll will never be exact, but it was probably more than 1021.  The official police report put the number at 1031 and The Brooklyn Eagle newspaper listed 1204 as dead or missing.

In the neighborhood of Little Germany families were decimated, many losing a mother and two or more children. In some cases entire families were killed. At the Lutheran Cemetery in Middle Village, Queens, over 900 victims were buried, including 61 in a mass grave for the unidentified.

The owners of the General Slocum, The Knickerbocker Steamboat Company escaped jail time for negligence. Knickerbocker President Frank Barnaby was indignant at people wanting to sue him or his company. Knickerbocker filed suit that a limit be fixed to their liability claimed by the plaintiffs as the number of suits grew for loss, damage and injury.The liability limit they wanted was not to exceed the value of the boat. That is the value of the boat after the fire and beaching and termination of the excursion should not exceed the sum of  for all the victims collectively — $5,000. That would amount to less than $5 paid per fatality and injured.

The owners then had the gall to claim that under maritime law that sum should be subject to the fees of the salvage and wreckage services performed. Essentially, they were claiming they should be limited to the current value of their wrecked boat which would be close to nothing. Sure enough, besides a fine they had to pay, Knickerbocker ended up paying nothing to the survivors or the victims’ families.

Ship safety inspectors Henry Lundberg and John Fleming who had passed the General Slocum despite numerous violations were indicted. Lundberg was tried three separate times for manslaughter but was never convicted.

Eight people were indicted by a federal grand jury after the disaster: the captain, two inspectors, and the president, secretary, treasurer, and commodore of the Knickerbocker Steamship Company.

Most boatmen felt that Van Schaick "was unjustly made a scapegoat for the resulting tragedy, instead of the owners of the steamer or the effectiveness of the life saving and fire fighting equipment then required — and the inspections of it by government inspectors". He was the only person convicted. He was found guilty on one of three charges: criminal negligence, for failing to maintain proper fire drills and fire extinguishers. The jury could not reach a verdict on the other two counts of manslaughter. He was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. He spent three years and six months at Sing Sing prison before he was paroled. President Theodore Roosevelt declined to pardon Van Schaick. Van Schaick was finally released when the federal parole board under the William Howard Taft administration voted to free him on August 26, 1911. He was pardoned by President Taft on December 19, 1912; the pardon became effective on Christmas Day. After his death in 1927, Schaick was buried in Oakwood Cemetery (Troy, New York).

The neighborhood of Little Germany, which had been in decline for some time before the disaster as residents moved uptown,  almost disappeared afterward. With the trauma and arguments that followed the tragedy and the loss of many prominent settlers, most of the Lutheran Germans remaining in the Lower East Side eventually moved uptown. The church whose congregation chartered the ship for the fateful voyage was converted to a synagogue in 1940 after the area was settled by Jewish residents.

 

What do you think of the General Slocum Disaster? Let us know below.

Now read Richard’s article on the role of baseball in the US Civil War here.

Slavery in New York has a long and sad history. Here, Richard Bluttal provides an in depth history of the subject from the 17th to the 19th century, from the Atlantic slave trade era to the end of slavery and beyond.

A depiction of an early slave auction in New York (then New Amsterdam). By Howard Pyle.

First Slaves Arrive in New World in 1619

Twenty Africans, carried on a Dutch ship, are brought to Jamestown, Virginia, to be sold as indentured servants, not slaves, a fine distinction that probably escaped their notice.

Jamestown had exported 10 tons of tobacco to Europe and was a boomtown. The export business was going so well the colonists were able to afford two imports which would greatly contribute to their productivity and quality of life. 20 Blacks from Africa and 90 women from England. The Africans were paid for in food; each woman cost 120 pounds of tobacco. The Blacks were bought as indentured servants from a passing Dutch ship low on food, and the women were supplied by a private English company. Those who married the women had to pay their passage--120 pounds of tobacco.

With the success of tobacco planting, African Slavery was legalized in Virginia and Maryland, becoming the foundation of the Southern agrarian economy. Very important when cotton becomes the main source of the economy by time of the cotton gin 1793.

Atlantic Slave Trade and the Middle Passage

Both Maryland and Virginia were in need of a more permanent source of labor: slaves. Although Massachusetts was the first colony to recognize slavery, Maryland and Virginia soon followed, with both colonies legalizing slavery during the 1660s.

Since some African chiefs or kings could increase their wealth by working closely with slave traders, one tribe might capture the warriors of another tribe and then sell their prisoners of war into slavery. Astonishingly, hundreds of thousands torn from their villages and homes survived degradation and deprivation to become the almost 4 million people held in slavery in 1860, at the eve of the Civil War.

Triangular Trade receives its name from the shipping routes that connected Europe, Africa, the West Indies, and North America in the transatlantic commerce of slaves and manufactured goods. These routes began in England, where goods were shipped to Africa. Nearly one-third of all slave voyages were outfitted in Liverpool, London, Bristol, and other ports in Britain. French vessels from such ports as La Rochelle, Le Havre, Bordeaux, and Nantes made up another 13 percent.

In Africa, the goods were then traded for slaves bound for the Americas. Known as the Middle Passage, the forced voyage from the freedom of Africa to the auction blocks of the Americas was a physical and psychological nightmare that lasted several weeks or months. Having unloaded their cargoes in the colonies, the ships returned to England laden with tobacco, sugar, cotton, rum, and other slave-produced items. This trade pattern continued with some modifications into the early nineteenth century.

In order to maximize profits and offset any losses, most captains packed as many Africans as possible into the holds of their ships. During the late 1600s and throughout the 1700s, most English ships that sailed directly from Africa to the colonies carried about 200 enslaved Africans. Later slave ships could carry as many as 400 slaves with a crew of 47.

Slaves were chained in pairs (the right arm and leg of one chained to the left leg and arm of another), and men and women were separated from each other. All of them were forced to lie naked on wooden planks below deck in extremely hot quarters. At times, small groups of slaves were allowed to come on deck for exercise; some of them were forced to dance. Women and children could occasionally roam the deck, but men were allowed on deck for only a short while. Heat, limited sanitary facilities (sometimes buckets for human waste were not emptied for long periods of time), and epidemics from diseases such as smallpox and dysentery together produced an unbearable stench onboard. An outbreak of disease could devastate an entire cargo of enslaved Africans, and an estimated 15 to 20 percent of slaves probably died on route to the colonies, primarily from diseases resulting from overcrowding, spoiled food, and contaminated.

Many also died of starvation and thirst. Yet captains most feared slave mutinies, 250 of which scholars estimate took place. As a result, those slaves who were disruptive or likely to cause a mutiny were thrown overboard.

Because of the stench and disease, many slave ships had to be abandoned after about five years. Eventually ships were built especially for human cargo, with shackling irons, nets, and ropes as standard equipment. During this process slaves were frequently and harshly flogged, sometimes with a paddle but more often with a whip that had a lead ball sewn on its end. They were also forced to learn how to speak a new language, eat new foods, and obey White masters.

At last, when the ship we were in, had got in all her cargo, they made ready with many fearful noises, and we were all put under deck, so that we could not see how they managed the vessel. ...The stench of the hold while we were on the coast was so intolerably loathsome....The closeness of the place, and the heat of the climate, added to the number in the ship, which was so crowded that each had scarcely room to turn himself, almost suffocated us. This produced copious perspirations, so that the air soon became unfit for respiration, from a variety of loathsome smells, and brought on a sickness among the slaves, of which many died -- thus falling victims to the improvident avarice, as I may call it, of their purchasers.

  • Dr Alexander Falconbridge describes the middle passage:

    The slaves lie on bare planks. The surgeon, upon going between decks, in the morning, to examine the situation, frequently finds several dead. These dead slaves are thrown to the sharks.

    It often happens that those who are placed at a distance from the latrine buckets, in trying to get to them, tumble over their companions, as a result of being shackled. This situation is added to by the tubs being too small and only emptied once every day.
    Fever - Alexander Falconbridge (a ship's doctor), An Account of the Slave Trade (1788)
    Some wet and blowing weather having caused the port-holes to be shut, fluxes and fevers among the negroes followed. I frequently went down among them, till at length their apartments became so excessively hot as to be only bearable for a very short time...
    The floor of their rooms was so covered in the blood and mucus which had come from them because of the flux, that it resembled a slaughter-house.

New York’s Involvement

Some of New York’s merchants and bankers profited directly by financing and participating in the Atlantic Slave trade.  In memoirs published in 1864, Captain James Smith, a convicted slave trader, claimed that in 1859 85 ships capable of  carrying between 30 and 60,000 enslaved Africans were outfitted in the port of NY to serve the slave markets of Cuba. “ I can go down to South Street, and go into a number of houses that help fit out ships for the business.” The trade was so profitable that on one voyage, a ship that cost $13,000 to fit her out completely, “ delivered a human cargo worth $220,000 to Cuba.

Major Dutch families such as Philipses were involved, others    had commercial ties with the British Caribbean colonies. By the mid-eighteenth century this family held over 52,000 acres in Westchester County and had one of the largest slave holdings.

By 1720 half the ships leaving New York were engaged in Caribbean slave trade. Slave auctions were held weekly and sometimes daily at the Wall Street slave market. Advertisements regularly appeared in newspapers- note Slave ads.

African Burial Ground

During the construction of the federal office tower in downtown Manhattan, the skeletal remains of over 400 slaves were discovered in graves. Of the 400 skeletons taken about 40 per cent were children under 15 years of age, the most common cause of the death was malnutrition, how? From examination of decayed teeth. The adult skeletons showed that many of these people died of unrelenting hard labor. Strain on the muscles and ligaments was so extreme that muscle attachments were commonly ripped away from the skeleton-taking chunks of bone with them-leaving the body in perpetual pain.

Showed that “colonial New York was just as dependent on slavery as many Southern cities, and in some cases ever more so.”

Slavery in Dutch New Amsterdam

The first Dutch agent of African ancestry who can be documented in the New York region was Jan Rodriguez in 1609. The first permanent European settlement in 1625 began when the Dutch West Indian Company established the village of New Amsterdam on Manhattan Island. From the start the Dutch had a labor shortage, the solution to merchants already engaged in the trans-Atlantic slave trade was to employ enslaved Africans clear the land, plant and harvest crops, and, to build houses, roads, fortifications and bridges. In 1626 a WIC ship brought eleven enslaved male Africans to the colony. Based on their names they were probably Africans from the southwest coast of Africa who were captured or purchased from the Portuguese.

Unlike the legal system in other slave colonies, Dutch laws did not mandate racial discrimination in New Amsterdam. Africans in the Dutch New Netherland colony could meet in groups, walk around the town without passes and own property. People of African ancestry could appeal to the Dutch courts for redress of grievances and even testify against Whites.

The “Land of the Blacks,” as it was known, covered the area that stretches from Greenwich Village north to Herald Square in midtown Manhattan today. In exchange for their freedom and land, each family agreed to pay taxes to WIC in corn, wheat and hogs every year.

Under Governor Peter Stuyvesant’s direction, a number of enslaved Africans became skilled caulkers, blacksmith, bricklayers and masons. In some cases, they were granted half-freedom , which meant they were still obligated to provide the WIC with labor when needed and that their children were not born free. Fort New Amsterdam was completed in 1635. Slaves built roads, cut timber and firewood, cleared land and burned limestone and oyster shells to make the lime used in outhouses and in burying the dead.

The enslaved Africans in the colony had a very ambiguous legal status. Dutch laws did not mandate racial discrimination in the colony. Africans could meet in groups, walk around town without passes and own property. People of African ancestry could appeal to the Dutch courts for appeal of grievances and even testify against Whites. In the portion of the colony beyond the wall stood a tract of land called “Land of the Blacks.” In exchange for their freedom and land, each family allowed to live there agreed to pay taxes to WIC in wheat, corn and hogs every year.

By 1654 the Dutch West India Company began to ship slaves to New Amsterdam more consistently, in larger numbers, and directly from Africa in an effort to develop New Amsterdam in a major North American slave port.

The variety of rights and privileges enjoyed by African slaves in New Amsterdam, relatively kind masters, good opportunities to form families, and access to courts and some forms of property-did not mitigate the fundamental facts of enslavement for Africans: involuntary, largely unpaid, life long servitude and ultimate lack of control over one’s individual and family life

Slave Auctions in Dutch New Amsterdam and Colonial America

Slave auctions took place regularly at a market on Wall Street. Between 1700 and 1774, over 7,000 slaves were imported into New York, most of them destined for sale to surrounding rural areas. This figure was dwarfed by the more than 200,000 brought into the southern colonies in these years.

Slave Auctions were advertised when it was known that a slave ship was due to arrive. Ads were placed in local newspapers advertising arrival of ships and slaves for

When the slave ship docked, the slaves would be taken off the ship and placed in a pen. There they would be washed and their skin covered with grease, or sometimes tar, to make them look more healthy. This was done so that they would fetch as much money as possible. They would also be branded with a hot iron to identify them as slaves. There is a folder labeled Slave Auction that includes images. There are two types of Slave auctions. Later on in 1711 the municipal government established a Meal Market on the east side of New York where enslaved Blacks were auctioned to new owners or hired out for a period of time.

British Takeover of New Amsterdam 1664 and policies towards slaves

In 1664 Colonel Richard Nicolls, commanding four British ships and several hundred soldiers, sailed into New Amsterdam harbor. A surprised Governor Stuyvesant surrendered without firing a shot. It was estimated that in 1664 about eight thousand Whites and seven hundred Africans lived in New Amsterdam.  To the dismay of Africans the English soon began to replace the Dutch lenient “half-slavery” with their own profit-driven, mean spirited bondage. Africans in Manhattan faced new hardships and challenges as they pressed their search for liberty and justice. In the British takeover folder are materials including a power point we will examine. Different from the Dutch ownership of slaves in British New York spread widely among the White population.

       Some Restrictions on Slaves:

  1. In 1677 a New York court stated that any person of color brought to trial was presumed to be a slave.

  2. Slaves had to carry a pass and could not leave their owners’ homes on Sundays.

  3. One city ordinance prohibited more than four Africans and Native Americans from meeting together.

Slavery in New York prior to the American Revolution and the resistance movement

Europeans employed slave men in skilled occupations such as carpentry, tailoring, blacksmithing, shoemaking, baking and butchering. Large numbers of male slaves were employed on the docks. Slave women, usually no more than one per household, aided White women with cooking, cleaning, and childcare.

Most Manhattan slave owners actively discouraged their slaves from marrying or having children.

New York lawmakers attempted to limit interactions among slaves in the city. Through regulations, New York lawmakers sought to control the cultural, social, and political independence of slaves.

The biggest fear of masters was that education and conversion to Christianity would encourage slaves to seek freedom. Records show that in New Amsterdam enslaved Africans collectively petitioned for wages as early as 1635 and used incessant colonial warfare. As slavery became more restrictive under the British, slaves expressed their discontent through various forms of resistance during the 18th century. Slaves stole more cash, clothing, and food from masters’ households and ran away more frequently than they had under the Dutch. frightening to which than such small acts of resistance was the threat of slave revolt.

An important theme during the 18th century in New York is the increasing resistance to bondage by enslaved Africans in the colonies.

Organized physical violence was one aspect of resistance, however, that organized, armed violence was a relatively rare occurrence during the 350-year history of slavery in the United States. Why were armed rebellions so infrequent? Slave masters monopolized armed power, severely restricting slaves’ access to weapons. Slave masters also closely monitored their slaves’ activities, limiting their movement and freedom of association. Under these circumstances, organization and planning were next to impossible. On those rare occasions when the enslaved escaped their masters’ purview, they faced yet other mechanisms of White control—militias, local patrols, and vigilantes. Rebels who avoided the net of surveillance and enacted their conspiracies were always dealt with in brutal fashion.

Hard usage” motivated two dozen slaves to stage an uprising in 1712 in which they set fires on the outskirts of the city and murdered the first Whites to respond. There followed a series of sadistic public executions, with some conspirators burned to death or broken on the wheel. The colonial Assembly quickly enacted a draconian series of laws governing slavery. These measures established separate courts for slaves and restricted private manumissions by requiring masters to post substantial bonds to cover the cost of public assistance in the event that a freed slave required it. The discovery of a “Great Negro Plot” in 1741, whose contours remain a matter of dispute among historians, led to more executions and further tightening of the laws governing slavery. As a result, few Black New Yorkers achieved freedom through legal means before the era of the Revolution.

Public hangings and decapitation were common punishments. Other rebels were gibbeted alive, burned alive, or broken on the wheel. In all of these instances, punishment was meant to demonstrate the totalizing effects of White supremacy, terrorizing those who remained enslaved. Remarkably, some slaves still embarked on what they must have known were suicide missions. Were the men and women who confronted their masters with violence so desperate that they preferred death to living in slavery? Or, did they really believe that they could be the exception and overthrow White supremacy? These are important questions to consider.

During the American Revolution resistance also meant joining British forces.

In the South, by the nineteenth century, running away to the North offered the virtue of a tenuous freedom; however, failed runaways also met with serious reprisals. Most did not try to escape. For those who remained enslaved, resistance took on more familiar everyday forms.

Of all the Black activists engaged in the struggle to end slavery and secure equal rights for African-Americans the most prominent with Frederick Douglas of Rochester, New York.

Ownership of slaves was widespread. Most worked as domestic laborers, on the docks, in artisan shops, or on small farms in the city’s rural hinterland. In modern-day Brooklyn, then a collection of farms and small villages, one-third of the population in 1771 consisted of slaves.

On the eve of the American Revolution, the city’s population of 19,000 included nearly 3,000 slaves, and some 20,000 slaves lived within 50 miles of Manhattan island.

Our Founding Fathers and Slavery

The existence of Slavery in the US was taken for granted by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787; there was little or no discussion of abolishing it. The Slave trade, however, was very much in contention.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 provided that an owner of his agent could seize a runaway and bring him or her before any judge or magistrate with “proof” of slave status, whereupon the official would issue a certificate of removal. Any person who interfered with the process became liable to a lawsuit by the owner.

The market for slaves was about to explode in volume and everyone knew it.

Prohibiting the African trade, as the New England delegation wanted to do, would create a grand bonanza for Virginia slaveholders-at the expense of South Carolina.

  • Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution reads: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight.

Jefferson framed ending importation of persons as humanitarian act. Ending the African slave trade was protectionism on behalf of Virginia. It kept out the cheaper African imports so as to keep the price of domestically raised people high.

The Great Awakening in New York 1740s through the American Revolution

Beginning in the 1740s, a time of religious revival led New York City Whites and Blacks to reconsider the morality of slavery. National, state and local conventions of Black activists became important weapons in the battle against slavery.

The struggle for freedom and equality required the development of African-American community institutions and indigenous leadership. Quakers began to call upon their members to free their slaves.

Remember the New York economy relied too heavily on slavery for Whites to give up the system so easily. However, the influence of the Great Awakening convinced New York City slaves, and a few Whites more strongly of African-American’s rights to freedom.

The first emancipation proclamation in American history preceded Abraham Lincoln’s by nearly ninety years. Its author was the Earl of Dunmore, the royal governor of colonial Virginia, who in November 1775 promised freedom “all indentured servants, negroes, or others” belonging to rebels if they enlisted in the army.

Gouverneur Morris 1777

“The rights of human nature and the principles of our holy religion call up us to depense the blessings of freedom to all mankind…….It is therefore recommended to the legislatures of New York to take measures consistent with the public safety for abolishing domestic slavery. “

The founding of the New York Manumission Society in 1785 led by group of influential White New York City men gave enslaved Black people new allies in the struggle against slavery. The society offered legal assistance to Blacks seeking freedom, worked strenuously to oppose kidnapping of free Blacks and slave catching in the city, brought to court captains engaged illegally in the African slave trade, and sponsored antislavery lectures and literature.

In 1787 the society founded the first of several African Free Schools for free Black and enslaved children in New York Segments of the New York press also played an active role in the battle to end slavery in the United States.

In 1799, New York’s legislature finally adopted a measure for gradual abolition. It freed slave children born after July 4, 1799, but after they had served “apprenticeships” of twenty-eight years for men and twenty-five for women.

By 1816, the American Colonization Society was founded by American Whites, including many abolitionists. The society directed its efforts toward removing from the country Blacks already free. A number of abolitionists believed that racism was so deeply embedded in American life that Blacks could never enjoy freedom except by emigrating. The Black mobilization against colonization became a key catalyst for the rise of new, militant abolitionism in the 1830’s.

In 1817, the legislature decreed that all slaves who had been living at the time of 1799 act would be emancipated on July 4, 1827.  WHILE SLAVERY NO LONGER EXISTED, NEW YORK’S PROSPERITY INCREASINGLY DEPENDED ON ITS RELATIONS WITH THE SLAVE SOUTH. AS THE COTTON KINGDOM FLOURISHED, SO DID ITS ECONOMIC CONNECTIONS WITH NEW YORK.

The economy of Brooklyn was very tied to slavery. Warehouses along its waterfront were filled with the products of slave labor-cotton, tobacco, and especially sugar from Louisiana and Cuba. In the 1850’s sugar refining was Brooklyn’s largest industry.

During the American Revolution, slaves that sided with the British found employment reconstructing the damaged parts of the city and working for the British army as servants, cooks, and laundresses.  For the first time in their lives, they received wages and were effectively treated as free. When the British evacuated Philadelphia in 1778, moreB refugees arrived.

When the British sailed out of New York harbor in 1783, they carried not only tens of thousands of White soldiers, sailors, and loyalists, but over 3,000 Blacks most of whom had been freed in accordance with British proclamations. They ended up in Nova Scotia, England and Sierra Leone, a colony established by British abolitionists on the west coast of Africa later in the decade.

By 1830, more than a dozen Black congregations rented or owned buildings in lower Manhattan alone, including the African Methodist Episcopal Church, The Demeter Presbyterian Church and the First Colored Presbyterian Church. In 1832 the New York City Anti-Slavery Society was formed.

New York’s African American community supported the first Black newspaper in the United States, Freedom’s Journal.

Horace Greeley, the founder and an editor of the New York Tribune, took a strong moral position favoring the abolition of slavery.

Reverend Henry Ward Beecher was a leading opponent of slavery. Beecher raised money in his Brooklyn church, Plymouth Church, to purchase the freedom of slaves in symbolic protests against the institution.

The battle for social equality in New York led to civil disobedience. African-Americans even when legally free, were continually at risk. In an 1836 letter to the New York Sun, David Ruggles described the kidnapping of a free Black on the streets of New York.The presence of the rapidly growing free Black community ready to take to the streets to try to protect fugitive slaves would make New York a key battleground in the national struggle over slavery. Quickly Black institutions emerged-fraternal societies, literary clubs, and 10 Black churches. New York City replaced Philadelphia as the “capital” of free Black America. Africans can now been seen all over New York, many lived near the docks or in the 5 points.

The Underground Railroad in New York

New York City was a crucial way station to the metropolitan corridor  through which fugitive slaves made their way from the Upper South through Philadelphia and on the upstate New York, New England and Canada.

Women were important conductors on the UGRR. One important station in New York City was the Colored Sailors’ Home, where Mary Marshall Lyons, the owner’s wife, fed and disguised more than one thousand refugees.

The unique socioeconomic structure of Weeksville, a Black township, offered a safety net for fugitives, while Brooklyn itself was [a] Mecca of abolitionist culture, home to several notable antislavery pastors, authors, activists and others who were key to the call for freedom.

Profiting from Slavery

Documents found at the New-York Historical Society shown that the founders of Brown Bros. Harriman, based in New York City, built the bank by lending millions of dollars to Southern planters and arranging for the shipment and sale of slave-grown cotton in New England and Great Britain.

Economic historian Douglas North found that the North provided “not only the services to finance, transport, insure, and market the South’s cotton, but also supplied the South with manufactured goods.

Despite the efforts of Whites, in New York, the slave system supported the development of New York as a commercial and financial center, by 1860 it was one of the world’s major metropolises.

Nautilus Insurance company, wrote over 300 life insurance policies on enslaves Africans in the American South. Aetna

uncovered 7 life insurance policies taken out by plantation owners for enslaved Africans.

As a result of the cotton trade, the port of the New York exceeded the combined shipping of its two major American business rivals, Boston and Philadelphia, in both volume and the value of goods being processed.

Commercial ties between North and South also provided New York City merchants with other economic benefits. Southern merchants and their families made annual pilgrimages to the city, ordering imported and domestic luxury goods and patronizing hotels, restaurants and resorts.

Many New York merchants championed conciliation with the South and compromise with slavery even after the Southern states started to secede.

The economic ties between the Southern planters and New York merchants were so strong that at the end of the Civil War, prewar commercial arrangements were quickly reestablished.

When the Civil War came to New York

Of course, New York’s role in the Civil War was critical to the Union’s success. New York contributed more soldiers, sustained more casualties, and also contributed more war materiel and financial support for the war than any other state. Remember, New York was arguably the most pro-South, pro-slavery city in the North because it had a very long and deep involvement in the international cotton trade. Even though many New Yorkers were pro-slavery and opposed the Civil War, once it happened, being New Yorkers, they figured out how to make a profit out of it. The banks lent great amounts of money to the Union's war effort, and much of that money was spent right back in New York on uniforms and horses and food and other supplies.

While the Civil War pitted North against South, some locations confounded that stark regional split. New York was one of those places, a city of divided loyalties and complex class, racial, and economic interests. While most New Yorkers supported the war at its outset, significant forces urged conciliation with the Confederacy. From Wall Street financiers, to commercial shippers, to merchants selling manufactured goods to a South that produced little of its own, the New York City economy depended heavily on southern cotton.

When the Civil War began in 1861, large numbers of New York City’s White workers did not embrace the fight to preserve the Union. Many resented the war effort, which brought economic hardship and increasing unemployment to working-class neighborhoods. *Competition for jobs between Irish and Black workers, already intense before the war, increased dramatically, and racial tensions mounted in work places and in working-class neighborhoods throughout the city.

The National Conscription Act exacerbated long-simmering class tensions and the deprivations brought on by wartime inflation; it was especially unpopular among the city’s immigrant White working class. When it was enacted on July 11, 1863 (Draft Riots ), it touched off the worst rioting Americans had ever seen. People and buildings representing Protestant missionaries, Republican draft officials, war production, wealthy businessmen, and African Americans suffered the worst of the crowds’ wrath, and after four days more than 119 New Yorkers were dead. Soon after the riots were quelled by federal troops, the northern war effort finally started to bear fruit and the city’s economy rebounded (aided by the re-legalization of the cotton trade with the rebel states).

Nearly three-quarters of the Black men of eligible age volunteered for the Union army. Because White soldiers did not trust them in actual combat, most Black soldiers were assigned to support roles, though they sometimes engaged with the enemy. New York registered 4,125 soldiers in its three Black regiments, the 20th, 26th, and 31st United States Colored Troops. Trained at Riker's and Hart's islands in the East River in early 1864, they were dispatched to Louisiana, South Carolina, and Texas, respectively. The 31st was at Appomattox Court House when Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered his army.

Almost all the commissioned officers in U.S. Colored Troops regiments were White. David J. Pilsworth (1841-1895) enlisted as a private, suffered wounds in 1862, and was promoted to a captain of the 20th USCT after his recovery.

On June 17, 1864, Ellen Anderson, a respectable-looking widow, was ordered to leave the "Whites only" car of the 8th Avenue Railroad. "I said I was sick and wished to ride up home. I said I had lost my husband in the war. The conductor said 'he did not care for me, or my husband either,' and he and the police officer threw me off the car." She sued the railroad company and won. By July, all the streetcars in New York were open to Blacks.

Until the secretary of war intervened, city authorities forbade Blacks from marching behind Abraham Lincoln's body from City Hall to the Hudson River docks. Two thousand Blacks brought up the end of the march, carrying a banner that read "Abraham Lincoln, Our Emancipator." By that time, the body had already left the city.

For Black people, the years after the draft riots and the Civil War meant an increasingly fragmented community scattered through northern New Jersey, Westchester, Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Staten Island, but these distinctive neighborhoods developed their own civic, religious, and social organizations.

In New York, one final battle remained to preserve inequality and prevent Black suffrage. In April 1869, the state legislature ratified the Fifteenth Amendment to the federal constitution, guaranteeing the right to vote to Black men. But a New York State constitutional amendment for equal rights was voted down in November 1869, losing by 70-30% in New York City. In January, the new Democratic majority in Albany repealed the federal ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment by a vote of 69-55.

Despite New York's reversal, enough states did approve the Fifteenth Amendment, which was certified on March 30, 1870. Black Americans took the opportunity to celebrate a momentous victory.

On a self-titled album in 1969, the rock group The Band released “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down,” a song depicting the final days of the Confederacy in 1865.

What do you think of the article? Let us know below.

Now read Richard’s piece on the 1692 Massacre of Glencoe here.

Posted
AuthorGeorge Levrier-Jones
CategoriesBlog Post
5 CommentsPost a comment

Aaron Burr's life has always tangled itself in controversy. From killing the first Secretary of the Treasury and key figure in the Federalist Party, Alexander Hamilton, to being the defendant of the United States' first treason case, Aaron Burr was well known for a lot of questionable decisions and bad luck. However, none of his decisions were as objectively manipulative, callous, and greedy as purposefully letting New York City suffer with tainted water for the sake of building a bank. Haley Booker-Lauridson explains.

An early 19th century painting of Aaron Burr.

An early 19th century painting of Aaron Burr.

The New York Water System

Back when New York was New Amsterdam, the water sources were from nearby ponds, streams, and wells, and continued that way for many years. Without a waterworks system, the city's waste ran into the same water it drank from, and distributing drinking water to various areas of the city proved difficult. This troubled Christopher Colles, an Irish engineer and inventor who emigrated to Philadelphia in 1771, just four short years before the Revolution.

In 1775, he began organizing a project he proposed, constructing a water distribution system in the heart of New York. This system used a steam engine pump to extract water from various wells into a reservoir, which would then distribute the water throughout the city in pipes. However, the Revolutionary War came to the city a year later and the project had to be put on hold, and the British soldiers soon destroyed what was left of the fledgling water system.

Though he made several attempts at creating various waterways and different systems in the newly formed United States, none of his projects came to fruition. The water in New York was left in a state of rapid pollution. Without a way to draw clean water, the citizens of New York City drank water steeped in animal, human, and industrial waste. Water distribution was another problem; fires could not consistently be quelled without a distribution system that could quickly get the water to the flames.

With a population of 60,515 people in the city, the waters became increasingly dangerous. By 1798, up to 2,000 people died of yellow fever, which doctors attributed to the filthy water people were drinking. By that time, New Yorkers desperately needed a plan to bring clean water to the city.

 

"Pure and Wholesome Water"

Nearly 24 years after Colles proposed a water distribution system, a bill to secure water from the Bronx River was drafted and sent to the New York State Assembly in 1799.

Aaron Burr, State Assemblyman and Democratic-Republican, worked to convince the Assembly to let the city and state use a private company for their water. While Democratic-Republicans were the main supporters of the bill, they received help from an unlikely ally, Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton campaigned for the Federalist Assemblymen to reach across the aisle. As New York had become his home when he emigrated to America in 1772, it is easy to see why he might want to turn the water bill into a bipartisan decision. The water was terribly polluted and toxic, and Aaron Burr had partnered with him on several occasions, including working as defense attorneys in the first murder trial in the United States. Having trusted Burr and having believed in the cause for a waterworks system, Hamilton convinced his fellow Federalists to back the creation of the Manhattan Water Company.

What Hamilton, and many Assemblymen, did not know was that Burr, just before submitting the bill for its final approval, slipped in a clause allowing the company to use "surplus capital" however it chose, as long as it followed state and federal law. The bill passed through with this clause on April 2, 1799, and the Manhattan Company was created to supply New York with "pure and wholesome water."

This small, unassuming clause transformed what was intended to be a water system for New York into a bank. Burr intended to establish a bank all along. He and other Democratic-Republicans inherently distrusted the First Bank of the United States and its branch in New York, as it was linked with Federalist politics. They feared discrimination in receiving credit and loans, and also desired the power to control campaign finance with their own bank. They wanted to establish a bank manned by their own political party, and schemed to use the city's water crisis to manufacture one right under the Federalists' noses.

 

The Manhattan Water Company's Legacy

By September 1, 1799, the Bank of the Manhattan Company opened, eventually becoming the oldest branch of JP Morgan Chase, and remains a financial institution today.

While the Manhattan Water Company was ostensibly a front for a bank, it did provide the city's first waterworks system. Shoddily put together, it constructed a cheap, crude network of wooden water mains throughout the city, by coring out yellow pine logs for pipes and fastening them together with iron bands.

The system was sub-par at best. It froze during the winter and the tree roots easily pierced through the log pipes, causing terrible back-ups. Even when the system worked, the people suffered through pitifully low water pressure. And, despite having permission to get clean water that ran down the Bronx River, Burr chose to source water from the polluted sources the city tried to get away from.

The Manhattan Water Company continued laying wooden pipes in the 1820s, even though other U.S. cities began using iron clad pipes. It remained the only drinking water supplier until 1842, leaving people with unreliable and bad water for over forty years.

As the water system floundered and the bank flourished, Aaron Burr experienced very little but misfortune from then on. Hamilton made it his duty to keep Burr out of influential public offices, famously campaigning against Burr during the 1800 election, and later in New York's gubernatorial race in 1804. Hamilton often negatively featured Burr in his newspaper, the New York Post. He likely would have continued had he not been fatally wounded in a duel with the man in July of 1804. Burr faced political exile that solidified when he was tried for treason in 1807, eventually fleeing to Europe for several years before returning to the U.S. and living as a perpetual debtor until his death in 1836.

 

What do you think of Aaron Burr? Let us know below.

References

Beatrice G. Reubens, “Burr, Hamilton and the Manhattan Company. Part I: Gaining the Charter,” Political Science Quarterly, LXXII (December, 1957), 578–607.

Beatrice G. Reubens, “Burr, Hamilton and the Manhattan Company. Part II: Launching a Bank,” Political Science Quarterly, LXXIII (March, 1958), 100–25.

“New York City (NYC) Yellow Fever Epidemic - 1795 to 1804” http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/nycdata/disasters/yellow_fever.html

"The History of the Water Mains in New York City" https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/drinking_water/wood_water_pipes_history.shtml.

New York Laws, 22nd Sess., Ch. LXXXIV.