In the long and turbulent history of the Tudor dynasty, few individuals have left a mark as profound and enduring as Anne Boleyn. Her life unfolded against the glittering but dangerous backdrop of the court of Henry VIII, a world governed by ambition, ceremony, dynastic anxiety, and political calculation. To her enemies, she was a scheming temptress who destroyed England's unity for personal advancement. To her supporters, she was intelligent, cultured, reform-minded, and tragically misunderstood. Historians continue to debate her motives and character, yet there is little disagreement about her impact. Anne Boleyn became the catalyst for one of the most significant transformations in English history: the break with Rome, the birth of the English Reformation, and the reshaping of the monarchy itself.

Terry Bailey explains.

Read part 1 on King Henry VIII here, and part 2 on Catherine of Aragon here.

King Henry and Anne Boleyn Deer shooting in Windsor Forest by William Powell Frith , c1903.

When Anne emerged at court in the 1520s, England was still officially Catholic, loyal to the authority of the Pope, and outwardly stable beneath the rule of Henry VIII. The king was admired throughout Europe as the embodiment of the Renaissance prince. Athletic, educated, musically talented, and politically ambitious, Henry projected the image of a powerful monarch whose dynasty seemed secure. Yet beneath the splendor of the Tudor court lay a dangerous uncertainty. Henry's marriage to Catherine of Aragon had produced no surviving male heir. In a kingdom still haunted by the destructive memory of the Wars of the Roses, the absence of a prince threatened political instability and potential civil conflict. The survival of the Tudor line depended upon succession, and succession depended upon sons.

In Tudor England, marriage was never simply personal. Royal marriages were instruments of diplomacy, political alliance, and dynastic preservation. Queens were expected to embody virtue, loyalty, and obedience while fulfilling their most critical function: producing heirs. The pressure upon Catherine of Aragon became immense as pregnancies ended in tragedy and infant sons died young. Henry, increasingly fearful that God had cursed his marriage, began searching for both a solution and a justification. Into this atmosphere stepped Anne Boleyn.

Anne was born around 1501 into the ambitious Boleyn family, daughter of Thomas Boleyn and Elizabeth Howard. Although not of royal blood, the Boleyns were politically connected and eager to rise higher within Tudor society. Anne's upbringing differed significantly from that of many English noblewomen. Sent abroad at a young age, she spent years in the sophisticated courts of the Netherlands and France, where she received an education shaped by Renaissance culture. She learned French fluently, studied music and literature, developed refined courtly manners, and absorbed continental ideas about politics, religion, and humanism. These experiences gave Anne a cosmopolitan confidence that distinguished her sharply from many women at the English court.

The French court especially transformed her. Under the influence of figures such as Margaret of Austria and later Claude of France, Anne encountered a world where elegance, intellect, and political awareness were deeply valued. Unlike the passive image often expected of noblewomen in England, Anne developed a reputation for wit, conversation, and sharp intelligence. She was not considered a conventional beauty by the standards of the age, but contemporaries repeatedly described her charisma, dark eyes, expressive personality, and magnetic presence. She possessed something perhaps more dangerous than beauty alone: influence.

Upon returning to England, Anne entered the household of Catherine of Aragon. At court she quickly attracted attention. Men admired her sophistication and lively personality, while women copied her fashions and mannerisms. Among those captivated by Anne was Henry VIII himself. Initially, however, Anne refused to become the king's mistress. This decision altered the course of English history.

Henry had already pursued relationships outside marriage, including an affair with Anne's sister, Mary Boleyn. Yet Anne proved different. Whether motivated by personal conviction, ambition, or political calculation, she insisted that only marriage would secure her surrender to the king's desires. Henry's attraction deepened into obsession. He wrote Anne passionate letters expressing longing, frustration, and devotion, revealing a monarch increasingly consumed by personal desire and dynastic desperation. What began as a courtly romance soon evolved into a political crisis that would engulf England itself.

Henry's determination to marry Anne required the annulment of his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. The king argued that his union with Catherine violated biblical law because she had previously been married to his late brother, Arthur Tudor. Henry cited passages from Leviticus suggesting that such a marriage was cursed with childlessness. Yet Catherine fiercely denied that her first marriage had ever been consummated, and she refused to accept the annulment quietly. The dispute dragged on for years.

The situation became entangled in European politics. Catherine's nephew was the immensely powerful Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, whose armies had recently dominated much of Europe. The Pope, effectively constrained by imperial influence, hesitated to grant Henry's request. What Henry had hoped would be a relatively straightforward legal matter became a humiliating diplomatic deadlock. The king grew increasingly frustrated with the papacy and with the limitations that Rome placed upon his authority.

During these years Anne Boleyn's influence expanded dramatically. She was no passive observer of events. Anne surrounded herself with scholars, reformers, and intellectuals interested in religious renewal and critical of papal authority. She read works associated with emerging Protestant thought and encouraged the circulation of reformist texts at court. Among the ideas gaining ground was the belief that monarchs should exercise authority over their own national churches without interference from Rome.

Anne's precise theological beliefs remain debated by historians, but there is strong evidence that she sympathized with reformist ideas. She supported vernacular translations of the Bible and patronized scholars who promoted scriptural study. In this sense, Anne became intertwined with the wider religious upheaval spreading across Europe in the wake of Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation. Yet in England religion and politics became inseparable. Henry's marital crisis was not merely spiritual; it was dynastic and constitutional. Anne's rise helped accelerate a transformation that would permanently alter England's religious identity.

The king increasingly embraced the argument that his authority derived directly from God rather than through papal mediation. Assisted by advisers such as Thomas Cromwell and Thomas Cranmer, Henry began dismantling papal authority in England. Parliamentary acts gradually severed ties with Rome, culminating in the declaration that the king was the Supreme Head of the Church of England. The English Reformation had begun.

This transformation represented one of the greatest turning points in English history. For centuries the Catholic Church had dominated religious, social, and political life. Monasteries controlled immense wealth and land, while Rome exercised spiritual authority across Christendom. Henry's break with Rome changed this balance forever. The Crown gained unprecedented control over religion, church property, and ecclesiastical appointments. Religion became both cause and consequence of Henry's marriage to Anne Boleyn.

Anne and Henry married secretly in late 1532, likely because Anne was already pregnant. In January 1533 the marriage became public, and later that year Thomas Cranmer formally declared Henry's marriage to Catherine invalid. Anne was crowned queen in a magnificent coronation ceremony at Westminster Abbey. The event was designed to project legitimacy, splendor, and divine approval. Lavish pageantry filled the streets of London as Anne processed toward her coronation surrounded by nobles, banners, musicians, and elaborate symbolism celebrating the future Tudor heir.

Yet beneath the grandeur lay deep division. Many ordinary people still regarded Catherine of Aragon as the rightful queen. Anne was widely blamed for England's religious upheaval and for the king's treatment of Catherine. Hostility toward the new queen simmered constantly. Tudor politics was intensely personal, and public opinion mattered more than rulers sometimes realized. Anne's position remained insecure because her authority depended entirely upon Henry's favor and her ability to produce a male heir.

In September 1533 Anne gave birth at the Palace of Placentia not to a son, but to a daughter: Elizabeth I. Henry attempted to conceal his disappointment, and elaborate plans for a prince's celebration were hastily altered for the arrival of a princess. Yet the birth of Elizabeth would ultimately prove one of the most consequential events in English history. The child who disappointed her father would later become one of England's greatest monarchs.

At the time, however, Anne's failure to produce a son placed her in a dangerously familiar position. Several pregnancies ended in miscarriage or stillbirth. The pressure upon queens in Tudor England was relentless. Their political value depended largely upon fertility and the production of male heirs. As Anne struggled with repeated losses, Henry's affection began to fade. Meanwhile, the king was growing increasingly attracted to Jane Seymour, a quiet and traditionally submissive court lady who contrasted sharply with Anne's outspoken personality.

Anne's sharp intelligence and political engagement, once attractive to Henry, now increasingly irritated him. She involved herself in matters of religion and patronage, argued fiercely, and challenged powerful men at court. Her enemies multiplied rapidly. Conservative nobles hated her reformist sympathies, while others feared the growing influence of the Boleyn faction. Even Thomas Cromwell, once her ally in advancing the Reformation, became her opponent amid disagreements over foreign policy and the distribution of monastic wealth seized by the Crown.

The atmosphere at court in 1536 became increasingly sinister. Following another miscarriage, reportedly of a male fetus, Henry's patience appears to have collapsed. Anne's enemies moved swiftly. In May 1536 she was arrested and charged with adultery, incest, and treason. The accusations claimed that Anne had conducted affairs with several men, including musicians, courtiers, and even her own brother, George Boleyn.

Most modern historians regard the charges as politically motivated fabrications or gross distortions. The evidence presented at trial was weak, contradictory, and in some cases impossible chronologically. Yet Tudor justice rarely protected those who had fallen from royal favor. Anne was imprisoned within the Tower of London, the same fortress through which she had once passed triumphantly before her coronation.

Her trial was a carefully orchestrated spectacle. Surrounded by hostile nobles and abandoned by many former supporters, Anne defended herself with intelligence and composure. Nevertheless, conviction was inevitable. She was condemned to death alongside the accused men, including her brother George. Henry VIII, the man who had once shattered England's religious unity to marry her, now sanctioned her destruction.

On the 19th May of 1536, Anne Boleyn was executed inside the Tower of London by a specially summoned French swordsman, considered more skillful and merciful than an English axeman. Contemporary witnesses described her final moments as calm and dignified. She proclaimed loyalty to the king even as she prepared for death. With a single stroke, her extraordinary rise ended.

Only eleven days later Henry became engaged to Jane Seymour.

Yet Anne Boleyn's influence did not die with her. In many respects, her true legacy was only beginning. Through her daughter Elizabeth, Anne became the maternal force behind one of the most celebrated reigns in English history. Under Elizabeth I, England emerged as a major Protestant power. The defeat of the Spanish Armada, the flourishing of literature and theatre, overseas exploration, and the strengthening of national identity all unfolded during Elizabeth's reign. Ironically, the daughter Henry once viewed as a disappointment secured the Tudor dynasty's greatest glory.

Anne's wider historical impact extended far beyond motherhood. Her relationship with Henry accelerated the English Reformation and permanently weakened papal authority in England. The redistribution of monastic lands transformed the economy and strengthened the Crown. Religious divisions unleashed during this period would shape English politics for generations, contributing to future conflicts, persecutions, and ideological struggles. England's evolving Protestant identity became central to its national development.

Anne also remains one of the clearest examples of the dangerous relationship between gender and power in Tudor England. She rose to extraordinary prominence in a political culture dominated by men, but her position depended almost entirely upon royal favor and reproductive success. Her downfall demonstrated how quickly women could become scapegoats within systems designed to preserve male authority. Anne's intelligence and political engagement made her influential, but also vulnerable. She challenged expectations of female silence and obedience in ways that fascinated supporters and alarmed enemies alike.

Within the broader narrative of Henry VIII's reign, Anne Boleyn marks a decisive turning point in the king's evolution. The charming and idealistic Renaissance prince of the early Tudor court increasingly transformed into a ruler capable of extraordinary ruthlessness. Through his pursuit of Anne, Henry broke with Rome, centralized royal power, and redefined the English monarchy. Through his destruction of Anne, he revealed the darker consequences of absolute authority.

Anne Boleyn's life therefore transcends romance, scandal, and tragedy. She stood at the center of a revolution that reshaped England politically, religiously, and culturally. Her rise revealed the intoxicating possibilities of influence at the Tudor court, while her fall exposed the terrifying fragility of power. Queen, reformist symbol, political casualty, and mother of Elizabeth I, Anne Boleyn remains one of the most consequential women in English history — a catalyst whose legacy transformed a kingdom and altered the future of the English-speaking world forever.

Anne Boleyn's story endures because it represents far more than the dramatic rise and fall of a queen at the Tudor court. Her life became inseparably bound to one of the greatest transformations in English history, a transformation that reshaped religion, monarchy, politics, and national identity for centuries to come. Few individuals have stood so directly at the intersection of personal ambition and historical revolution. What began as Henry VIII's desire for a new marriage ultimately evolved into a constitutional and religious upheaval that permanently altered the course of England and, by extension, the future of the English-speaking world.

Anne herself remains a figure of remarkable complexity. She was neither the purely innocent martyr imagined by some later Protestant writers nor the manipulative seductress portrayed by her Catholic enemies. Instead, she emerged from the volatile environment of Renaissance Europe as an intelligent, educated, politically aware woman whose ambition and influence challenged the traditional expectations imposed upon women in Tudor society. Her charisma, confidence, and reformist sympathies helped elevate her to unprecedented prominence, yet those same qualities also contributed to the hostility and suspicion that surrounded her. In a court governed by factional rivalry and royal favor, Anne's position was always precarious, dependent not only upon Henry's affection but upon her ability to fulfil the dynastic demands placed upon queens.

The tragedy of Anne Boleyn lies partly in the brutal irony of her fate. Henry VIII shattered England's centuries-old relationship with Rome to marry her, only to later destroy her when she failed to provide the son he desired. Her execution demonstrated the terrifying extent of Tudor royal power and revealed how quickly political favor could turn into deadly condemnation. Yet although her enemies succeeded in removing her physically, they could not erase the consequences of her existence. The religious changes accelerated during her rise continued long after her death, and her daughter Elizabeth would eventually vindicate Anne's legacy in ways that neither supporters nor enemies could have fully imagined.

Under Elizabeth I, England experienced a cultural and political flowering that secured the Tudor dynasty's place in history. The Protestant settlement, the defeat of the Spanish Armada, the expansion of English influence overseas, and the flourishing of literature and theatre all emerged from the world that developed in part through Anne Boleyn's rise and Henry's break with Rome. The daughter whose birth disappointed Henry VIII ultimately became the monarch who brought stability, prestige, and enduring strength to England. In this sense, Anne's greatest contribution to history may not have been her queenship, but the legacy carried forward through Elizabeth's reign.

Anne Boleyn also remains historically significant because her life continues to illuminate broader themes of power, gender, religion, and political transformation. Her experiences reveal the dangerous realities faced by women who exercised influence in male-dominated systems of authority. They expose the fragile nature of political survival in autocratic courts where reputation, fertility, and royal favor determined life or death. At the same time, Anne's story reflects the wider turbulence of sixteenth-century Europe, an era when religious reform, emerging national monarchies, and Renaissance ideas were reshaping the foundations of society itself.

More than four centuries after her death within the walls of the Tower of London, Anne Boleyn continues to fascinate because she cannot be reduced to a single interpretation. She was ambitious yet vulnerable, influential yet politically exposed, celebrated yet deeply hated. Her life combined romance, religion, tragedy, and revolution in a manner few historical figures can equal. Whether viewed as a reformist heroine, political victim, or catalyst of dynastic crisis, Anne Boleyn occupies a unique place in history. Her rise transformed a kingdom, her fall exposed the cruelty of Tudor power, and her legacy endured through the daughter who would lead England into one of its most defining ages.

 

Noe read part 4 on Jane Seymour here.

Posted
AuthorHistory Is Now Magazine
CategoriesBlog Post

Divorced, beheaded, died. Divorced, behead, survived. Six women reduced to a simple sentence. Yet those few words oversimplify Anne Boleyn. Anne a woman who spent her entire life defying labels and social expectations that were forced upon her, first as a woman and later as Queen of England.

Anne’s story has often been simplified as a one of love, loss, and betrayal. However, this version fails to mention the woman who dared to defy the patriarchy — a woman whose ambition and passion once turned the head of King Henry VIII — a relationship that would end with her being tried, imprisoned, and later executed by the axe. Does labelling Anne as a traitor, temptress or tragic Queen limit our understanding of who she was?

Sophie Riley explains.

A painting of Anne Boleyn.

The Temptress: How Anne Boleyn captivated a King

Anne Boleyn was unlike any woman that the English court and Henry VIII had ever seen — her wit, charm and intelligence made her irresistible and dangerous. Far from the delicate obedient ladies in court, Anne was the least likely contender to be Queen due to her family’s unconventional rise to power.

When she first stepped into the court at 21 Anne was hard to ignore, not one to rely on Tudor softness and submission, her musicality, intelligence, and fashion set her worlds apart from the traditional English court.

Anne’s unconventional behaviour came from a decade spent in France, during her early years she served as a lady in waiting to Mary Tudor who was briefly married to King Louis XII of France. After that she remained in France serving as a maid of honour to Queen Claude. Her exposure to French culture, language and belief systems would later influence both her rise and inevitable downfall in her later life.

Upon her return to the English court Anne was transformed into a sophisticated and cultured woman who would attract the attention of Henry Percy (Earl of Northumberland), Sir Thomas Wyatt, and later King Henry VIII.

Her power lay not just in her intelligence, but in her refusal to be Henry’s mistress —a decision that gave her unprecedented influence over the King and the court. Unlike her sister Mary who was Henry’s mistress, Anne set her standards higher and in doing so she became the unattainable prize — a challenge that fuelled Henry’s obsession.

Anne’s reputation as a temptress has continued long after her death, her ambition, confidence and passion were reduced to a sexist stigma.  As her influence over the King and the Court grew, so did the danger she posed to the men in power such as Thomas Cromwell. The very qualities that once made her irresistible to the men around her, now marked her as a threat, a vixen that was destined to fall from grace. The other Boleyn girl who captivated the King with her wisdom and beauty would be soon cast into the shadows as a traitor to the King.

 

The Traitor

The very foundation of Anne Boleyn’s rise and inevitable fall from grace entwines with Henry VIII's desperation for a male heir. Prior to their marriage Anne Boleyn promised him the son he desperately wanted that his previous marriage could not give him. Yet despite her dedication and will power she failed to secure the future of the Tudor dynasty which in turn would solidify her position as Queen of England. The pressure to produce a male heir mixed with Henry’s shifting desires made Anne a target. Anne’s status was attacked both personally and politically as Henry’s quest for a son continued., and her failure to fulfil would mark the beginning of her end.

Despite several failed pregnancies and the birth of her daughter Elizabeth, the King’s frustration grew. Influential courtiers such as Thomas Cromwell and Anne’s own Uncle Thomas Boleyn fuelled the fire. Cromwell saw Anne’s failure as an opportunity to orchestrate charges of adultery, incest, and treason against her. Beyond her issues with delivering an heir, it was Anne’s intelligence and assertiveness in court that fuelled her enemy’s hatred towards her. Her downfall is a warning to any woman daring to have power in a patriarchal society.

With Annes failures and the charges in place a public trial was inevitable- and Thomas Cromwell ensured the system worked to transform the Queen’s religious ambition into a criminal act in eyes of a patriarchal court. Anne Boleyn was a woman who spoke with influence, she was also a vocal supporter of Protestant reform, aligning herself with a faith that was radicalised unsettled the catholic court. Her promotion of protestant beliefs and reformist teachings stemmed from her early years in France where she was exposed to them. These views in turn with her refusal to be a passive queen made her many enemies within the traditional court that was based on patriarchal beliefs. To men like Cromwell, Anne’s qualities made her dangerous, by painting her as morally and politically corrupt. Cromwell weaponised Anne’s gendered defiance and her reformed ideology all under the guise of loyalty to the King.

In the afternoon of May 2nd, 1536, Anne Boleyn was taken from Greenwich Palace to the Tower of London on the charges of adultery, incest, and treason. These charges against her were extreme by design she was accused of committing adultery twenty times with five different men including incest with her own brother George Boleyn. Furthermore, she was accused of plotting to kill her husband the King. The charges were deliberately designed to destroy her morally, politically, and personally. Adultery by a Queen in Tudor England questioned the legitimacy of the heir to the throne as it endangered the royal line. Meanwhile incest added to the horror that ensured public outrage towards Anne. The case was backed by questionable evidence; confessions extracted under torture, inconsistent dates that would frequently change or be retracted by men who would later die in disgrace.  But the whole truth was never expected in this case. The accusations were branding tools in a propaganda campaign that would lay the groundwork for Annes inevitable downfall.

 

The Tragic Queen

Anne Boleyn’s fall from grace was not simply because of failed pregnancies or court rivalries — it was the tragic consequence of a woman who was determined to defy social and gender expectations in a traditional patriarchal society that was not ready for a powerful woman like her. A woman who would pay the ultimate price with her life — a life cut short by a world that demanded their Queens to be silent and submissive, Anne’s intelligence, wit and reformist ideas made her into a dangerous and revolutionary figure.

As Henry’s eyes began to wander and his affections towards Anne shifted so did her alliances as her position became increasingly unstable. The most shocking came from her own family her uncle Thomas Howard showed no hesitation in turning against his niece for his own self-preservation. Her fellow courtiers who had once benefited from her favours and support also retreated to protect their own status. In a world were allegiance dictated survival, Anne was left alone to defend herself. Her own father remained silent throughout the trial and even after the execution he retreated to his home in Heaver castle with his wife.

Even in death, Annes legacy refused to be diminished — all her wit, charm and intellect was passed onto her daughter Elizabeth I who would be one of England’s most influential Queen’s. Elizabeth would have a long reign despite her father who believed that women should not rule on their own.

 Over the years Anne Boleyns legacy has been retold, reimagined, and reinterpreted — transforming her from a tragic Queen into one of the most compelling figures in English history. A legacy that includes triggering the English reformation, giving birth to the future Queen Elizabeth I, and becoming a symbol of endurance and dignity in the face of injustice. Once condemned as a traitor and a temptress, vilified by all in Tudor England, she is now portrayed across the media as powerful women ahead of her time

 

Conclusion

Anne’s life cannot be reduced to a single label, word, or tragic ending. She was a woman who was too complex for a male Tudor England too understand. Her complexity was shown through her determination to not be another submissive woman within the court but to be an intelligent and politically astute Queen. Though history tried to define her as a temptress that seduced the King or a traitor who betrayed their King and country. None of these labels fully capture the woman who reshaped the English monarchy and left a legacy through one of its greatest rulers Queen Elizabeth I.

Her story forces us to confront the uncomfortable truths around how women in power were treated in comparison to their male counterparts. Anne’s rise and fall from grace reflects the unattainable expectations and harsh limitations that are placed on women from a patriarchal society — and the dangers they are faced with when challenging it. In the end it was the court of male Tudor opinion that destroyed her not her feminine flaws.

So, we must now ask ourselves when we consider Anne Boleyn as a traitor, temptress, or a tragic Queen, are we understanding her — or simply repeating the same patterns that tried to silence her in life?

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

Posted
AuthorHistory Is Now Magazine
CategoriesBlog Post

Jane Boleyn, the wife of George Boleyn and sister-in-law to Anne Boleyn, is often portrayed as a wicked and jealous woman who was instrumental in the downfall and death of both her sister-in-law Anne, and her husband George. But is that the case? Is she the villainous woman that she is made out to be? There is evidence to suggest that she is not. Jennifer Johnstone explains…

 

Jane’s life

Jane Boleyn was born Jane Parker, to Henry Parker, 10th Baron Morley, and mother Alice in 1505. She came from a wealthy upper class family. Her father was an intellectual, a lover of books and writing. Little is known about her mother. There is speculation about Jane’s early life in Julia Fox’s Jane Boleyn: The Infamous Lady Rochford, but little solid evidence.

The first documented evidence we have about Jane is when she comes to the royal court as a teenager, and serves Catherine of Aragon. Her exact date of her arrival is not documented though. Unfortunately, we do not know what Jane truly looked like either, as there is no official portrait of her. Fox gives us a portrait in her book of what Jane might have looked like though.

Jane Boleyn, Viscountess Rochford.

Jane Boleyn, Viscountess Rochford.

Scapegoat or villain?

In Fox’s book, she argues that Jane was history’s scapegoat, rather than an instrumental player in the downfall of her family members. Some other contemporary historians disagree with this, arguing that rather Jane was to blame for the executions of her family members.

As there is limited evidence, we have to work with what few sources we have about Jane. First let us see the evidence for Jane as a villain.

 

Villain

Jane has always been thought of as the woman who gave evidence to Thomas Cromwell about George and Anne having an affair, or Anne having an affair - depending on the source. There is evidence to say that Jane Boleyn spoke out about her husband during court proceedings. But there is no clear evidence for what Jane actually said, or, what her motivation was for saying whatever she said about her husband. So, if we don’t know what Jane said, we can’t condemn her for this. There is also no record of Jane saying anything about her alleged role in their downfall. Some have speculated that Jane gave this evidence in spite towards her husband for having affairs. But, is there any truth to these claims?

Let’s take the example of George’s alleged affairs. There is a poem called Metrical Visions about a womanizing young man - the young man is said to be George Boleyn. Even if this poem is accurate - that George had extra-marital affairs - there is nothing to suggest that there was friction between his and Jane’s marriage. Indeed, Julia Fox argues that the marriage between Jane and George was not an unhappy one! Of course, if there were affairs, Jane would have had a reason to be jealous, and that could have been her reason to give evidence against her own husband at the court trials. But even if it were true that George had an affair, or a string of affairs, at the time, it was the done thing in this age; it was common for men to have mistresses. So, if he did have affairs, it would not have got George into terrible trouble; it would have got a woman into trouble though.

However, there is evidence to suggest that Jane was instrumental in the Boleyn’s downfall. This evidence comes from the Bishop Burnet. Bishop Burnet claims he had access to primary sources, which show Jane’s role in the downfall of her own family. The source says, ‘’Jane carried many stories to the King or some about him (George) to the King.’’ There was further evidence Jane allegedly gave to the King, and that was that ‘’there was a familiarity between the queen, and her brother, beyond what so near a relationship could justify.’’

There are several problems with this source. One, there is no evidence from anyone else about this source documented, not from the King, Cromwell, or Chaupys. If this was true, it would have been well known within the court, and it would have at least been recorded by one other person – notably Chaupys as he documented many events and was well aware of court activities. A second reason to not believe this source is that it is from several decades after Jane was executed. A third, and final reason why I believe this source is not accurate is because there is little evidence of these primary sources that Burnet claimed to have.

Even people who argue against Jane, who argue she was responsible for the downfall of her husband and sister-in-law, admit that many details are unknown about her. This tells us that because we know so little about Jane, it is unwise to call her names such as ‘vindictive’ ‘wicked’, and ‘spiteful’.

 

Victim

It is equally plausible that Jane might have been innocent of the accusations that have been placed against her.

There were many noble women who gave evidence at the trials, not just Jane; there is nothing to say that it was her testimony that brought the axe down on her family. The ever reliable Chaupys does not tell us it was Jane who gave the damning evidence. In fact, he does not name anyone. He just says ‘’that person’’, was to blame for the downfall. I think it’s important to take Chaupys as a reliable source here as he championed Lady Mary’s return to court when it would have been in his interests to name and shame a Boleyn, because of the religions fraction between the Protestant Boleyns, and the Catholic Mary. Wouldn’t Chaupys want to stir up trouble for the Boleyns? After all, this was not a man shy of his words - he called Queen Anne ‘’the concubine’’.

It is still disputed today who brought down the Boleyns. Some believe that it is the Seymours, some believe it was the Boleyns themselves, other historians believe that it is Cromwell, or Lady Mary, and lastly, some think that the king himself wanted Anne gone. Whatever the truth, with missing evidence, and court politics and cover-ups, we are likely to never know the answer. We can but speculate.

 

One last thing…

But, there is one final and interesting point that Julia Fox raises. It is perhaps the most important point - Jane had everything to lose from the Boleyns falling. Why would a woman who had everything to lose, by turning on her own family, bring them down? It doesn’t make sense. She had never been in a better position because she was wealthier and more prestigious than she had ever been when they fell.

Maybe the truth is still waiting to be discovered somewhere…

 

Did you enjoy this article? If so, do tell others. Tweet about it, like it or share it by clicking on one of the buttons below...

Posted
AuthorHistory Is Now Magazine
CategoriesBlog Post
3 CommentsPost a comment

How familiar are you with the Tudors? In this article, Jennifer Johnstone introduces us to some of the key events and people in the period including bloody religious change, kings and queens, and King Henry VIII’s six wives.

 

Everyone is familiar with the Tudors. Or at least, most people know about Henry VIII, and his six wives: Catherine of Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, Anne of Cleves, Catherine Howard, and finally Catherine Parr, alongside another one of England’s longest serving monarchs: Elizabeth I. The first Tudor royal was King Henry VII (1485-1509), then his son, Henry VIII (1509-1547), then to the boy King Edward VI (1553), briefly Lady Jane Grey sat on the throne in 1553, to be ursurped by Mary I, sometimes referred to as ‘Bloody Mary’ (1553-1558), and finally, the last of the Tudor monarchs was Elizabeth I (1558-1603). In the television program The Tudors, Catherine of Aragon describes Anne Boleyn as ‘the scandal of Christendom’; however, it seems like an accurate description of the Tudors themselves, as they divided a country religiously, broke with Rome, and reformed England in a way that changed the country forever.

King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn

King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn

Family divisions

The Tudors did not only divide the country of England religiously, between Catholic and Protestant, but they were divisive amongst themselves too. They were a family of intense division.

One of the divisions in the Tudor court came from the contentious relationship Mary I had with Anne Boleyn. It is said that they hated each other, and even tried to kill one another. The Imperial Ambassador of the time, Eustace Chapuys, claimed that Anne tried to poison Mary. But there is a lac k of evidence to suggest that Chapuys’ claim is true. Chapuys wasn’t an impartial figure in the Tudor court; he is said to have supported Lady Mary and her mother Catherine of Aragon. But it is also claimed that Anne said to her brother George that, “she would consider putting Mary to death if the King ever left her as Regent while he was away in France.” Perhaps there is some truth to the claim that Anne thought that it would have been easier on her if Mary was out of the equation, but to accuse her of murder without strong evidence, doesn’t give us an accurate picture of what Anne really thought of Mary.

So, what did Mary think of Anne? Well, Mary seems to have resented the new Queen. And that she even rejoiced when Anne did not and could not produce a son for Henry. Mary seemed to blame Anne for her parents’ divorce, and the ill treatment by her father towards her. It’s possible that Anne could have been partly to blame for Henry’s mistreatment towards Mary, but Henry stripped Mary of being a princess of his own accord; she was in favor one minute and banished the next minute from court. Henry also had the notion that a son was more important to the Tudor’s future; seeing Mary as inferior in this way must have affected her psychologically too. Indeed, Mary later became a bitter, resentful, and brutal Queen.

 

Henry VII

The divisions which were rife throughout the Tudor period can be seen from the dawn of the Tudor period as Henry VII came to power in a divided country. The country was at civil war when Henry VII defeated King Richard III in battle. The civil war was called the 'The War of the Roses', a battle between two families, the White Rose of York and the Red Rose of Lancaster (the Tudor Rose), hence the name 'Roses'.

Henry VII is know for his ruthless taxes on the populace. With the money taken from these taxes, Henry VII was able to leave a fortune to his son Henry VIII. Henry VII also reformed laws, and the powers of the King. All told, although Henry VII came to power with a bang, nothing terribly noteworthy happened in his reign, hence why some regard Henry VII as an unmemorable ruler. But, we do not have that problem with his son.

 

Henry VIII

Henry VIII succeeded his father to the throne on April 21, 1509, and his coronation took place on June 24, 1509. He is well known for forming the Church of England at the expense of the Catholic Church. This was partly because the Pope would not grant Henry an annulment on his first marriage, to enable him to marry again. The establishment of his own church gave Henry the chance to marry a total of six times. Interestingly, his marriage with Anne of Cleaves lasted only six months, but he remained friends with Anne for the duration of their lives. Catherine Parr had understandable reservations about becoming Henry's Queen - who of us would want to marry a King who easily tired of his wives, and was prepared to chop off their heads? They say the only one that Henry really loved was Jane Seymour. Perhaps this was because she gave him the son that he desperately wanted.

But Henry seemingly had several other sons, albeit ‘bastard’ (illegitimate) ones. They were Henry FitzRoy, Thomas Stukley, and Richard Edwards. Considering that Henry VIII had many affairs, and the social stigma that surrounded 'bastard' children, there were very likely more children of Henry's too. Of his three sons, only one was recognized by Henry VIII. The rest were not. In short though, Henry VIII can be seen as a self-serving King, particularly during the Reformation.

 

The Reformation

The Reformation brought scandal to Christendom across Europe. But was the English Reformation about political and religious rule for Henry? Or was it just about Henry VIII seeking to remarry?

The answer is a mixture of both.

The Lutheran Reformation, which began in 1517, was focused on challenging clerical power and educating the public about the bible, including encouraging them to read the bible in English. Another factor were the resented taxes imposed by the Catholic Church on the people of England. The Catholic Church had a lot more power over countries in those days; Cardinals were the politicians of their day. Cardinal Wolsey would be a perfect example; he had a lot of power in Henry VIII’s day.

Usually in history it's a collection of elements that spur these political breaks, so it would be naïve of us to think that the break with Rome was just an issue of Henry wanting to remarry.

 

Anne Boleyn

Anne Boleyn is often seen as one of the main driving forces of the English Reformation; this is indeed true. Her faith in Protestantism was strong. She adhered to the Lutheran doctrine, a point that one of Anne's Boleyn's biographers argues. In her book on Anne Boleyn Joanna Denny argues that Anne was a passionate reformer. She writes: “Her views were evangelical, many would say Lutheran. She read the bible daily, and believed that everyone should be able to read the bible in a language they understand.” Therefore, it can be seen that Anne, as well as Henry, were both in favor of bringing the Reformation to England. However, they were not alone; there were plenty of powerful figures in the Tudor court that supported the English Reformation, such as Thomas Boleyn and Thomas Cromwell.

So, a country that Henry VII united, was divided again by the Reformation, into two main religious ‘ideologies’: Catholicism and Protestantism. After Henry's VIII’s reign, Mary I burnt Protestants at the stake, while after her Elizabeth I burnt Catholics at the stake.

But to end, let us consider Henry VIII’s own words:

''Alas, how can the poor souls live in concord when you preachers sow amongst them your sermons of debate and discord... here will see these divisions extinct, and these enormities corrected.''

 

You can find out more about the Tudors as part of our English Civil War blog post series. Read the first article in the series by clicking here.