The Battle of Olustee, or Battle of Ocean Pond, took place in Florida, on February 20, 1864 - and was of course part of the American Civil War. It was the largest battle fought in Florida during the war. Ryan Reidway explains.

The Battle of Olustee by Kurz and Allison.

“In ninety hours we have marched one hundred and ten miles, fought a battle of three hours duration, got badly whipped, and what is left of our little army is back again to where we started from.” Lieutenant George E. Eddy of the 3rd Rhode Island[1].

The battle Lieutenant Eddy was referring to was the battle of Olustee, also known as the battle of Ocean Pond. Located in what is now Baker County, Florida,  it was fought on February 20, 1864. It was the largest Civil War battle to be fought within the state of Florida, second only to the Battle at Natural Bridge the following year.

Some historians, such as University of Florida History Professor Sean Adams, claim it was one of the deadliest battles of the Civil War due to the combined casualty rates.  2807 dead, of whom 1861 were Union soldiers and 946 were Confederates. In terms of percentages of total forces committed to the battle, the Union suffered a 35 percent casualty rate and the Confederates suffered a 20 percent casualty rate.[2]

Despite these statistics, it is often an overlooked moment within the history of the Civil War.  For instance, when looking through the Library of Congress’s database for the Battle of  Vicksburg, there are 8,102 results for books and printed materials. Gettysburg has some 12,997 results. Even the Battle of Meridian, in Mississippi, which ended on the same day as Olustee was fought and had far fewer casualties, has 14,329 results. 

Olustee has 793, which signifies the lack of research and general knowledge about the battle. Few books mention it, and even fewer are devoted specifically to it. Which, in itself, is perplexing, considering the results of the Confederate Victory at Olustee had a significant impact on the state for the remainder of the war. The battle marked a firm commitment by the people of Florida to support the Confederacy and meant they would not return to the Union until after the war's conclusion.   

 

Gilmores - Build Up To the Battle

At the beginning of 1864, Florida, which had long been considered a relatively insignificant backwater state within the Confederacy, came into the spotlight. With the fall of Vicksburg the year before, the Confederate Government in Richmond became increasingly dependent on Florida to feed the Confederacy. It was estimated by the New York Times that some 2 million cattle were being shipped from Florida to Virginia and North Carolina to support the Confederate war effort[3].

The Union realized how strategically important the state was becoming to the Confederate War effort. With most of the state’s formal troops deployed to the Tennessee Campaign, and with the militias of the state overextended by late 1863, it seemed like easy picking for the Federal forces. It was estimated that in the entire state, there were only 3000 untested militia men defending the state, and of that, only 1500 were in the region where the Union planned operations. [4] 

Commanding what at the time was known as the Florida Expedition, Major General Quincy A. Gilmore outlined the objectives of the campaign as exploiting resources, blocking resources to Confederates, disrupting rail service, and recruiting black soldiers. Of course, with the presidential election of 1864 only months away, Gilmore saw an opportunity to impress his boss, Abraham Lincoln. By launching a campaign in Florida, it could be possible to return the disfranchised state to the Union before voters go to the polls in November.

Union naval raids up and down both coasts, as well as a sophisticated naval blockade of the peninsula, had been successful for the majority of the war. In addition, the Union had managed to take back control of many of its pre-war coastal installations throughout the state, including in Key West, Pensacola, Saint Augustine, and Jacksonville. But to meet the demands of his goals, Gilmore was going to have to venture away from the coast and march his army into the interior of Northwest Florida.

By heading west from Jacksonville, he planned on leading his army along the rail lines of the Florida, Atlantic, and Gulf Central Railroad towards Tallahassee. That would cut off the majority of Florida’s population from the rest of the Confederacy. And so by December of 1863, Gilmore began preparations.

The next month, in January 1864, during correspondence with a superior officer, he bragged about the autonomy the Secretary of War had given him over the campaign. “In regard to my proposed operations in Florida, the Secretary replied that the matter had been left entirely to my judgment and discretion, with the means at my command, and that as the object of the proposed expedition had not been explained, it was impossible for you to judge its advantages or practicability.”[5] It is in this example that we get an example of the hubris that would plague the Union soldiers at Olustee.   

Relying deeply on his subordinate commanders, especially Brigadier General Truman Seymour, Gilmore gave the order for Union troops to debark from Hilton Head, South Carolina, to Jacksonville on February 5, 1864. Seymour was ordered to capture the railroad junction in Baldwin. 

 

Seymour's Incompetent Arrogance and Finnegans Luck

5,500 troops under Seymour’s command began their march west on February 6th, 1864. The first few days of the operation were mildly successful. There was very little opposition by Confederate forces, and it appeared as if all of the Confederate artillery positions had been taken into Union control. Baldwin fell very quickly, and Seymour's men were pressing forward towards Sanderson. Communications and a supply chain with Jacksonville were established by the Eleventh.     

From the very beginning of the operation, Gilmore’s dispatches argue that he placed a great deal of trust in Seymour and expected him to follow orders without question. Gilmore was impressed by the success of the operation so far, yet he was wary of launching an attack on Lake City (the next major target of the campaign) until he felt more confident that the Union controlled the situation. Skirmishes in Sanderson on February 12 forced Seymour to put the bulk of his force in Baldwin. Gilmore sent for Seymour and demanded that a string of fortifications be built at St. Mary's, Baldwin, and in Jacksonville to shore up Union positions. For the next few days, he reiterated the need to stay on the defensive and not risk offensive maneuvers on several different occasions.

On the 15th of February, after ordering one last time that work was to be continued on the defense networks and for Union troops not to advance any further, Gilmore left Jacksonville and sailed to Hilton Head, South Carolina, effectively leaving Seymour in charge. Almost immediately after his departure, Seymour began preparations to march on Lake City. Historians are not completely sure why Seymour chose to do this. Was it his hubris, or did he believe the Union held the advantage at that point? Even after being beaten back in Sanderson only days before.     

Unbeknownst to Gilmore, Seymour, or any of the Union leadership in Florida at the time, the Confederate Commander in charge of the state, Brigadier General Joseph Finegan, had been reinforced.  A call went out by John Militon, Florida's Governor, asking for recruits for the militia. At the same time, the soldiers from Georgia were also brought in, and by the time the battle started on February 20, he commanded somewhere between 5,000 - 5,000 troops. 

Though he was not the first choice of either Governor Militon or General P.G.T. Beauregard, who commanded the Department of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida,[6] Finegan knew he had something to prove and began making preparations for a counteroffensive. Before the reinforcements even arrived, he had managed to push Seymour back from Sanderon, forcing him to regroup his forces outside Baldwin.

This dispatch that was sent to Governor Milton, regarding the encounter, highlights the tenacity of Finegan and gives a preview of what could be expected at Olustee. “I captured five pieces of artillery, held possession of the battlefield, and killed and wounded the enemy. My cavalry are in pursuit. I don't know precisely the number of prisoners, as they are being brought in constantly. My whole loss will not, I think, exceed two hundred and fifty killed and wounded. Among them, I mourn the loss of many brave officers and men.”[7]

 

 

 

 

The Battle

On Wednesday, February 20th, 1884, the unexpected yet crucial battle began. With fresh reserves, a minor victory a few days before, and a willingness to stop the Union advance, Finegan decided to hunker down at the railway station just outside Olustee.

Around six in the morning, Seymour left Barbers Plantation in Sanderson and began his approach directly towards the Confederate Lines. “The US force chose speed over security based on previous actions since the expedition’s landing, when most difficulty with the secessionists was keeping them from escaping.”[8] Seymour had opted to take a direct route westward, following the Florida Atlantic and Gulf Railroad lines. 

To ensure success, he sent out cavalry to scout the area ahead of the main infantry formations. An hour later, the first shots of the day rang out as the Union cavalry scouts met Finegan’s cavalry. The Union cavalry prevailed and pressed onward. Unbeknownst to them, Finegan's ultimate goal was to lure the Federal troops within range of his newly constructed fortifications.

Union forces continued through the rest of the morning to follow the railway line leading towards Olustee. Eventually, both sides met each other in the swamp that surrounded the Olustee Railway Station, known as Oceans Pond. This is where the bloody stalemate would take place.

Union forces consisted of the 7th Connecticut and the 7th New Hampshire, as well as the 8th United States Colored Troops. Probably the most famous unit to take the field that day was the 54th Massachusetts, which was made up of African American Soldiers. The unit had made a name for itself after the successful attack on Fort Wagner during the battle of Gimballs Landing the previous year. Though they fought heroically and ultimately stayed behind to allow for the bulk of the union force to retreat, most of them did not finish their training, endured the consequences of poor leadership, and were given subpar weapons to fight.

Confederate forces were made up mostly of Georgia Regiments, including the 64th and 32nd, as well as the famous Gambles Light Artillery unit. Due to the reorganization of artillery pieces before the battle, initial battlefield deaths in the unit, and poor utilization of weapons and general confusion among the troops, Gambles' unit was not very helpful to the Confederate cause at Olustee.   

Halfway through the battle, the Confederate troops almost ran out of ammunition. These initial problems with supply columns prolonged the engagement. But by late afternoon, new stockpiles of ammo arrived, and Finegan pushed the assault. He was able to rout the Union forces, and by the time the sun went down, his forces had ousted the federal troops from Oceans Pond. Confederate forces pursued Seymour's troops for almost 36 miles to the east before calling their advance off. 

 

Lessons from Olustee

While it was a defeat for the Union, it did highlight the weaknesses of the Confederate Army. Supply issues, which had existed in other battles throughout the Civil War, were highlighted during Olustee. In fact, after the battle, “as secessionists advanced, they reported taking ammunition from the US dead and wounded on the field and capturing over 130,000 rounds of ammunition that had been sitting at Barber’s Station, the previous US camp.”[9] Major resources had been devoted to the cause, which would plague the state and the Confederacy in months to come.

On the Union side, it proved that the understanding of geography and the enemy's devotion to defending their home should never be second to the whims of egotism. In addition, many of the soldiers in the Union Forces found the battlefields' geographical conditions inhospitable. Fighting in a swamp was new to even the most seasoned of Yankee veterans.

Historians have questioned Seymour’s decision to press forward towards Olustee for 166 years. More remarkable was that despite this defeat, he went on to have a celebrated military career.  

The battle, which in some ways was symbolic and in others strategic, proved the commitment of Florida to the Confederate Cause. It also demonstrated the need to reevaluate outdated military protocols regarding cavalry and artillery usage. It represented a moment of pride in how fearless African American soldiers were on the battlefield. Finally, this battle kept Florida in the war a little longer.   

   

Did you find that piece interesting? If so, join us for free by clicking here.

 

 

References

Anderson, M. G. (2022). Staff Ride Handbook for the Battle of Olustee, Florida, 20 February 1864. Army University Press. Retrieved June 7, 2025, from https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Books/CSI-Press-Publications/Staff-Ride-Handbooks/

Brigadier General Joseph Finegan, CSA. (n.d.). Battle of Olustee. Retrieved May 28, 2024, from https://battleofolustee.org/finegan.html

Fiegan, J. (1864, February 10). Rebel accounts. Governor Milton's dispatch. Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 8. Retrieved June 07, 2025, from https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2001.05.0093%3Achapter%3D90

Gilmrore, Q. A. (1884, 7 March). General Gilmores' Report. Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 8. Frank Moore, Ed. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2001.05.0093%3Achapter%3D90

Lion Heart Film Works. (2020, February 20). Civil War 1864 "Olustee: Battle in the Pines" Full-Length Documentary. YouTube. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28Ukf7wg0ac

Olustee Battlefield Citizens Support Organization, Inc. (2024). Brigadier General Joseph Finegan, CSA. Battle of Olustee. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from https://battleofolustee.org/finegan.html

THIRD RHODE ISLAND. THE DISASTER IN FLORIDA-ADDITIONAL INTERESTING PARTICULARS. (1864, March 01). Letters, Newspaper Articles, Letter, Newspaper Articles Books and Reminiscences of Olustee. Retrieved May 23, 2024, from https://battleofolustee.org/letters/3rd_rhode.htm

Zombek, A. M. (2022, September 6). The Battle of Olustee. American Battlefield Trust. Retrieved June 22, 2025, from https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/battle-olustee


[1] (Third Rhode Island. The Disaster in Florida-Additional Interesting Particulars, 1864)

[2] (Zombek, 2022)         

[3] (Lion Heart Film Works, 2020)

[4] (Brigadier General Joseph Finegan, CSA, n.d.)

[5] (Gilmore, 1884)

[6] (Olustee Battlefield Citizens Support Organization, Inc., 2024)

[7] (Fiegan, 1864)

[8] (Anderson, 2022)

[9] (Anderson, 2022)

Major General Daniel Sickles was one of the most colorful and controversial figures of the Civil War era, known as much for his flamboyant personality and scandals as for his political and military actions. He can be viewed as either an American war hero or an infamous murderer and insubordinate military commander, and it's not easy to decide which categorization is more accurate.  Sickles was an unscrupulous swindler who led a life that no writer of fiction could have invented. A brief synopsis: Lawyer, Tammany Hall politician, US Congressman from New York, he married a 15 year old woman and became a serial adulterer, brought an infamous prostitute to London to meet the Queen, murdered his wife’s lover (Francis Scott Key’s son Philip, the US District Attorney for the District of Columbia) in broad daylight across the street from the White House, pleaded temporary insanity (invented for him by Edwin Stanton) and won acquittal by smearing her in the press. And that was just before the war!

Then, he recruited the Excelsior Brigade, lost his leg at Gettysburg, testified against Meade at Congressional hearings, was appointed to evaluate the impact of occupation on the south, appointed diplomat to Colombia, had an affair with the Queen of Spain, received the Medal of Honor, and championed saving the battlefield at Gettysburg as a park.  

In short, he was a diplomat, playboy, lousy husband, beloved general, congressman, murderer, and good old boy. This was a man who looked out for himself and got other people killed with no qualms. He had zero training as a soldier. He was self-aggrandizing, selfish, corrupt, and unprincipled, but he was also brave, patriotic, and extremely enterprising. He got away with all of it because he was colorful, resourceful, and charming.  Thomas Keneally, the author of Schindler’s List, wrote an outstanding biography of General Sickles, entitled American Scoundrel, and that sobriquet fits perfectly.

Lloyd W Klein explains.

Major General Daniel Sickles.

Early Life

Sickles was born to a wealthy New York family and trained as a lawyer. He soon became involved in Democratic Party politics. He was closely aligned with the Tammany Hall political machine, which helped his rise despite his checkered personal life. He served in the New York State Senate and was then elected to the U.S. Congress as a Democrat from New York in 1856.

 

The Murder in Lafayette Square (1859)

Sickles discovered that his wife, Teresa, was having an affair with Philip Barton Key, the handsome U.S. Attorney and son of Francis Scott Key, author of The Star-Spangled Banner. Sickles shot and killed Key in broad daylight in Lafayette Park, across the street from the White House. This led to his greatest notoriety before the war. Key had been signaling Teresa with a white handkerchief outside her window to arrange secret meetings. When Sickles found out, he confronted Key in public, shouted, “You must die!”—and shot him multiple times with witnesses present.

The trial was sensational. Sickles’ defense team—including Edwin Stanton, future Lincoln war secretary—argued that Sickles was driven temporarily insane by betrayal. The public mostly sided with Sickles, seeing him as a wronged husband defending his honor, even though he himself had a long track record of infidelity. Verdict: Not guilty. Sickles was acquitted after arguing he was temporarily insane. Sickles' claim to Infamy is that he was the first person in U.S. history to use the temporary insanity defense—and it worked.

Despite his notoriety, Sickles was politically well-connected and knew his way around the intricacies of Congress and New York State politics. He was not a natural Lincoln ally. Lincoln, a Republican, ran against the very sort of people Sickles called friends. However, once the Civil War began, Sickles became a vocal pro-Union Democrat, which made him useful to Lincoln, who desperately needed Democratic support to prevent border states and northern cities from turning against the war.

Lincoln rewarded Sickles with a commission as a brigadier general, despite his scandalous past. He had no military experience, just political clout, becoming one of the few political generals. But Lincoln understood that having a Democrat representing New York and Tammany on his side was good politics..

 

Army Experience Before Chancellorsville

When the Civil War broke out in 1861, Sickles used his connections to raise troops despite having no formal military training. Sickles organized the Excelsior Brigade (composed mostly of New York volunteers) and was appointed a brigadier general of volunteers in September 1861. He commanded with flair, although he had no prior military experience.

In early 1862, Sickles temporarily lost his commission due to political wrangling and issues with his official confirmation. He spent several months lobbying in Washington and was reinstated later in 1862, thanks to his political influence. Sickles commanded the Excelsior Brigade, a New York volunteer unit he had personally recruited and organized. The brigade was part of Major General Joseph Hooker’s division in  III Corps under the command of Major General Samuel P. Heintzelman.

 

Seven Days

At the outset of the Peninsula Campaign in spring 1862, Sickles was not present with his brigade. He had returned to Washington, D.C., to lobby for confirmation of his military commission, which was being held up in the Senate due to concerns over his checkered past and political appointment. Sickles’ commission was finally confirmed in May 1862, and he rejoined the Army of the Potomac shortly before the Seven Days Battles. By the time of the actual fighting, his Excelsior Brigade had already seen action without him at battles such as Williamsburg and Fair Oaks/Seven Pines.

During the Seven Days Battles, Sickles’ brigade participated in some of the fighting, particularly in the Battle of Oak Grove (June 25) and Glendale (June 30), though the records are somewhat unclear on the exact extent of Sickles’ personal involvement.

By the end of 1862, Sickles was commanding a division in the III Corps, Army of the Potomac. He served under General Joseph Hooker and participated in the Battle of Fredericksburg (December 1862), although his division was held in reserve and saw limited action.

 

Chancellorsville (May 3-4, 1863)

By the time of the Battle of Chancellorsville, Sickles was a major general in command of the III Corps. He was a political general with limited battlefield experience but significant ambition and personal charisma.

On May 2, Confederate General Stonewall Jackson launched the famous flanking attack that shattered the Union XI Corps on the Union right. Jackson devised a daring plan that divided the numerically inferior southern army and then marched his Corps far around the Union army to strike unsuspecting northern troops on their extreme right flank. Meanwhile, Sickles, with the III Corps in the center-left, was ordered to make a probing advance and moved forward to Hazel Grove, a clearing with commanding artillery potential. We know today that numerous Union forces had detected Jackson’s movement, and Colonel Sharpe of the Military Intelligence Unit had warned Hooker. But Hooker believed that Jackson was in retreat, not advancing on his flank. Scouts on Hazel Grove from Sickles’ Corps informed Hooker that they saw and heard Jackson’s men to their west. Sharpe had even deployed aerial balloons and spotted the movement.

As the morning progressed though, Hooker grew to believe that Lee was withdrawing. He ordered III Corps to harass the tail end of Lee's "retreating" army. General Sickles advanced from Hazel Grove towards Catharine Furnace and attacked Jackson’s men in the rear guard. Jackson’s main force continued onto Brock Road, where it meets the Orange Plank Road, directly into the Union right flank. Sickles informed Hooker, to no avail, that Jackson wasn’t retreating but was on the move.

By the morning of May 3, Howard's XI Corps had been defeated, but the Army of the Potomac remained a potent force, and Reynolds's I Corps had arrived overnight, which replaced Howard's losses. About 76,000 Union men faced 43,000 Confederates at the Chancellorsville front. The two halves of Lee's army at Chancellorsville were separated by Sickles' III Corps, which occupied a strong position on high ground at Hazel Grove. Sickles’ troops at Hazel Grove were right in between. Hooker could have attacked either part and destroyed it. JEB Stuart was completely aware of this predicament. He was not in a position for a defensive battle. Instead, he prepared an attack at dawn on Hazel Grove rather than await what seemed to be the obvious move.

But Hooker ordered Sickles to withdraw from Hazel Grove and fall back closer to the main Union line—a serious tactical error. Hooker ordered Sickles off the high ground and instead to another area much lower called Fairview. Hooker felt he was losing and he couldn’t see the advantage of his position so he retreated to what he erroneously thought was a safe fallback position. JEB Stuart had been ready to fight for that ground, and now it had been given to him. Hazel Grove was then occupied by the Confederates, who used it to devastating effect. He took control of the high ground and blasted Sickles at Fairview, where he was a sitting duck for Stuart’s artillery.

Sickles would remember this moment 5 weeks later at the Peach Orchard. He wouldn’t make the mistake again of following orders he knew to be wrong, and especially he would not again let the high ground in his front be captured by the enemy without a fight.

Daniel Sickles, estimated to be 1861.

 

Gettysburg & the “Peach Orchard Gamble” (July 2, 1863)

Sickels’ most controversial moment came at the Battle of Gettysburg (1863), where he disobeyed orders and advanced his corps into a dangerously exposed position.

The move led to severe casualties but arguably disrupted the Confederate attack. On the second day of the Battle of Gettysburg, Sickles did something extraordinary—and reckless. His orders were to hold the left flank of the Union line on Cemetery Ridge. But Sickles disobeyed, moving his III Corps forward nearly a mile to a rise near the Peach Orchard, creating a salient (a bulge) in the line. The decision to abandon the line General Meade assigned him to defend between Little Round Top and Cemetery Ridge, but rather to advance to the Peach Orchard, must count as one of the most fateful decisions of the entire war. General Sickles decided entirely on his own to defend the Sherfy Peach Orchard, adjacent to the Emmittsburg Pike, not the position assigned to him. This not only created a huge, undefendable salient, but it also left his flanks uncovered. The left flank, of course, was Little Round Top, Devil’s Den, and the Wheatfield. All of these killing fields had to be covered on the fly as troops entering the battle were immediately sent to desperate locations to save Sickles’ III Corps and the entire front. Day 2 of Gettysburg therefore depended on the heroism and courage of many men and their regiments now honored as heroes, including William Colville, Joshua Chamberlain, Patrick O’Rorke, and many others.

Sickles and his III Corps were assigned on the early morning of July 2 to be in line south of Cemetery Ridge and cover the low area and the Round Tops. Sickles perceived, correctly, that the ground his position was about 10 to 15 feet higher than the ground he was supposed to defend. He believed this ground would be perfect for artillery to destroy him. A very similar situation had happened at Chancellorsville when he was ordered by General Hooker to give up Hazel Crest, which then became the key to confederate artillery destroying the army on day 2 of that battle. Sickles hadn’t forgotten that experience, so he asked Meade for permission to move up at least twice. Meade thought that area was not a good position for artillery but was rather a no-man’s land, and on Day 3, he was proven to be correct. But Sickles made the decision to move up to the Sherfy Peach Orchard anyway. He showed his position to General Warren and to Captain Meade, the general’s son, neither of whom thought this was a good idea. Famously, when General Meade saw this right before the battle opened, he told Sickles that he was out of position and knew a disaster was in store.

III Corps was hammered by Confederate attacks. He was blasted in the leg by a cannonball (said to have kept smoking as he lay on the ground). His line collapsed, but his move arguably disrupted Longstreet’s attack and may have helped buy time for Union reinforcements. He lost his right leg, which had to be amputated, and sent the limb to the Army Medical Museum, where it’s still on display. Sickles visited it regularly in later years. He’d bring guests along, saying, “Let’s go see my leg.”

As Sickles recuperated, Lincoln visited him in the hospital. Sickles spun his wild maneuver as a kind of accidental genius: “Yes, I moved without orders, but look how it saved the Union line!” Lincoln, who knew politics as well as war, didn’t publicly criticize Sickles, even though most generals thought he’d nearly ruined the battle. Lincoln needed popular heroes, and Sickles was selling himself as one. There’s no record of Lincoln outright endorsing Sickles’ version of events—but he never denounced him, either. Lincoln tolerated Sickles because he was politically useful, loyal to the Union, and wildly effective at self-promotion. Sickles respected Lincoln, perhaps because Lincoln didn’t judge him for the things others never forgot—like adultery, murder, or insubordination. It was a pragmatic, oddly warm relationship—the honorable statesman and the rogue with a cannonball scar and a murder rap.

One of the great debates of the Sickles’ movement is whether it was a smart move or a dumb move. There is no doubt that not following orders isn’t a sign of working well with others, but Sickles wasn’t the kind of man to let that bother him. Given the fact that III Corps was crushed in this maneuver, one could say, rightfully, that it was a dumb move from that perspective. This decision led to the destruction of his III Corps; it threatened the entire left flank of the Union defense. By uncovering both of his flanks, including Little Round Top, and not telling anyone what he was up to, he put Meade at a serious disadvantage. The prosaic truth, though, is that it might have saved the battle. Longstreet arrived with the intent of attacking north but found III Corps waiting; this forced the attack eastward. Longstreet’s attack was supposed to go north, up the Emmitsburg Turnpike, landing on Cemetery Ridge. Instead, the attack direction was east, across the turnpike, landing further south than Lee had intended. The original idea was for an attack on the Union center, not its left flank. When Longstreet and Hood saw the position Sickles had taken, they knew that Lee’s plan was no longer viable; they couldn’t attack northwards while the Peach Orchard was in Union lines.

The argument that it was a really smart move that saved the battle does not deny that Sickles had no idea what he was doing, that he was insubordinate, that he threatened the whole union line, and that many soldiers died that day because of his decision.

 

Congressional Investigation

After the war, Sickles spent years smearing General George Meade, the commander at Gettysburg. Sickles claimed he had saved the day, not Meade. After Gettysburg, while other generals returned to quiet retirement or relative obscurity, Daniel Sickles launched a political campaign to rewrite the history of the battle—and to bury General George Meade/ Sickles hated Meade because Meade didn’t praise him for his “bold” (unauthorized) move into the Peach Orchard and blamed him for nearly unraveling the Union line. So Sickles went to Congress and began whispering, testifying, and maneuvering.

He gave testimony to the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, a highly politicized Congressional body led by radical Republicans who distrusted West Point generals like Meade. Sickles portrayed Meade as timid, indecisive, and nearly incompetent, suggesting that the Union could’ve destroyed Lee’s army if only Meade had pursued him more aggressively. Sickles took advantage of Meade’s lack of popularity and quiet demeanor to shape the narrative to his own benefit.

Sickles claimed that his unauthorized advance drew the Confederates into a trap. His sacrifice (losing his corps and his leg) helped the Union win the battle. Meade was ready to retreat from Gettysburg, and Sickles and others persuaded him to stay. Much of this was self-serving or false, but it stuck.

And Meade—an actual West Point general who won the most important battle of the war—found that his reputation never fully recovered from Sickles’ campaign. Meade was reserved, disliked political games, and didn’t defend himself well in public. Sickles, by contrast, was a master of spin. He leaked to newspapers, charmed Congressmen, and turned Gettysburg into his victory. Even decades later, monuments popped up at the Peach Orchard and the line Sickles had created—many due to his efforts and fundraising.

Sickles used his role as a former congressman and war hero to full effect. He testified multiple times, always angling to elevate his role. He stayed close with key members of Congress, many of whom distrusted Meade and the Army’s high command. He helped shape early public memory of Gettysburg—not by rank or fact, but by force of personality. Sickles weaponized testimony to smear Meade and polish his legacy. He turned a near-disaster into a story of heroism and sacrifice. He influenced how the war and Gettysburg would be remembered. In short, Sickles lost a leg, nearly lost a battle, and then won the credit for the victory in Congress. Sickles received the Medal of Honor in 1897 (largely due to his own lobbying) for the winning the battle at Gettysburg.

 

Post-War Life

Lincoln’s assassination hit Sickles hard. Though politically and personally different, the two shared a strange kinship: both were outsiders, both survived enormous personal loss, and both were men who navigated immense scandal and contradiction. After the war, Sickles helped memorialize Lincoln, attending events and praising him as the savior of the Union—even as he continued pushing his own battlefield legend. Sickles knew a political stalking horse when he saw one, and he tied himself closely to Lincoln.

Daniel Sickles’ postwar life was as colorful, scandalous, and self-serving as his wartime career—maybe more so. Once the fighting stopped, he turned his full energy toward politics, diplomacy, monument-building, and intrigue, always placing himself at the center of the action (or at least the story).

 

U.S. Minister to Spain – A Scandal in Madrid

In 1869, President Grant appointed Sickles as Minister to Spain, a plum diplomatic post. And, true to form, Sickles created headlines: he reportedly had an affair with Queen Isabella II (already deposed but still influential).

He tried to negotiate the annexation of Cuba—a long-held American dream—but was far too erratic to be effective. He made diplomatic waves by openly supporting Cuban rebels against Spain, which caused confusion and tension. His time in Spain was glamorous, chaotic, and utterly Sickles. After a few years, Grant recalled him—he had outlived his usefulness and outworn his welcome.

 

Political Operator & Congressional Drama

Sickles returned to the U.S. and ran for Congress again in the 1880s. He won—because he still had political clout. His legend (and storytelling) still played well with veterans and the press. He positioned himself as the defender of Union veterans, advocating for pensions and memorials. He used his seat to promote Gettysburg preservation, always to highlight his own role. He remained a master of the behind-the-scenes political game, buttering up allies and undermining rivals.

 

Founding the Gettysburg National Military Park

Sickles played a central role in the creation of what would become the Gettysburg National Military Park. He was a founding member of the Gettysburg Battlefield Memorial Association (GBMA), created in 1864 to preserve the battlefield.

He used his political connections to secure funding, land purchases, and publicity, all while making sure his old positions were commemorated. He lobbied for national control of the battlefield, which Congress approved in 1895. The War Department took over the site, making it one of the earliest national military parks.

In the 1890s, Sickles was appointed chairman of the New York Monuments Commission, responsible for erecting state monuments at Gettysburg. Sickles had monuments built along the line he occupied on Day 2 of the battle—including the Peach Orchard, Wheatfield, and Devil’s Den area—even though that line had been a disaster militarily. He ensured his III Corps got prominent recognition. He blocked or delayed monuments to commanders and units that had criticized him. He boosted his image as a martyr who had saved the Union line—his missing leg became part of the mythos.

Sickles never got a monument of his own at Gettysburg—at least not an official one.. The monument on the field at Gettysburg to his brigade was supposed to include a bust of him. What happened to it? He allegedly stole the money given by charitable donations and kept it for himself. His later years were dogged by embezzlement accusations related to the New York Monuments Commission. In 1912, a bombshell dropped: $27,000 in funds had mysteriously disappeared. That’s nearly a million dollars in today’s money. Sickles was accused of misappropriating the funds, but he claimed he didn’t know where the money went. He never admitted guilt. He was removed from the commission, but never prosecuted—likely due to his fame, age, and connections. The scandal derailed efforts to give him an equestrian statue at Gettysburg. To this day, he’s the only corps commander at Gettysburg without a monument.

His reputation was so tainted by that point that even his allies backed away from a monument. But Sickles didn’t care—he had already built his legend into the park’s landscape. He argued that the entire battlefield was a monument to him. This isn’t surprising given the size of his ego. He may have lost a leg and almost a battle, but he won the memory war. He influenced how the battlefield was memorialized, ensuring his Peach Orchard line was heavily commemorated. Some say he preserved Gettysburg not for history’s sake, but to rewrite his role in it. He played a major role in the preservation of the Gettysburg battlefield, helping turn it into a national park.

American Scoundrel is truly the right description for this man, who demonstrated no evidence of a moral compass. He helped create the battlefield park. He influenced which sites were preserved and emphasized. He used monuments to reshape public understanding of his role. He made sure Gettysburg was about legacy, not just tactics, and very much his legacy.

 

Daniel Sickles in 1911.

Legacy

Daniel Sickles remains a deeply divisive figure: Some see him as a self-promoting rogue and reckless commander. Others credit him with playing a pivotal role at Gettysburg. Historians often present both sides: bold, flawed, fascinating. If you like historical drama with real-life consequences, Sickles is your guy.

Historians, Civil War buffs, and battlefield guides have spent over a century arguing about how to rank, remember, and judge this uniquely outrageous figure. In the decades right after his death (1914, age 94), Sickles was remembered mostly as a scandalous but lovable rogue. Veterans who served under him remembered his charisma and bravery. He was still widely considered a hero of Gettysburg, thanks to his relentless mythmaking and the monuments his friends placed on the battlefield. He was seen as flawed—but entertaining, and above all, American in his contradictions.

But in the mid-20th Century, there was a backlash. As historical analysis became more rigorous, especially post-WWII, historians began to sharply reassess Sickles. He was criticized as a glory-hound, incompetent field commander, and blatant self-promoter. His decision to move his corps forward at Gettysburg was labeled insubordinate and disastrous, weakening the Union left and costing thousands of lives. He was accused of poisoning Meade’s legacy and distorting the historical record to elevate himself. By the 1950s and 60s, serious Civil War scholars often treated Sickles as a cautionary tale of political generals run amok.

Today, modern historians fall into two main camps: Villain or Disruptor. His decision at Gettysburg was irresponsible and disrespectful to the chain of command.

sleazy in politics and postwar behavior. No question, too, that he was self-serving—a saboteur of Meade’s legacy and battlefield truth, but his advance to the Peach Orchard disrupted Lee’s plan, despite disobeying orders. Historians like Garry Adelman and James Hessler have produced recent work that’s more nuanced, arguing that while Sickles was reckless, his maneuver may have inadvertently helped, and that his impact on battlefield preservation was immense.

Sickles was flamboyant, scandal-prone, and unrepentant. He can be remembered as: a heroic general, an ostentatious rogue; a man who lived a dozen lives (in one body, minus one leg). And perhaps most fittingly, a man who never stopped campaigning—even when the war was long over. He was:

·       A murderer turned war hero

·       A wounded general with a public skeleton (literally)

·       A womanizer and political operator

·       A man who could charm, offend, or politically outmaneuver almost anyone

 

He lived to age 94, never expressed regret, got away with all of it, and managed to ensure that we are still talking about him more than a century later. And there is no doubt that that is exactly the legacy that he wanted.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

The American Civil War had a number of critical junctures in 1862. Here, Lloyd W. Klein considers the 1862 Peninsula Campaign and The Seven Days Battles. Here, he considers the final part of the campaign, including the Seven Days Battles.

A depiction of the Battle of Savage's Station.

Battle of Oak Grove or French’s Field (June 25, 1862)

A surprise attack by McClellan began a series of six major battles over the next week—the Seven Days Battles. By the last week of June, the Army of the Potomac lay astride the Chickahominy River, two-thirds of its strength south of the river and one-third north of it. Lee hoped to crush the portion north of the river and then turn against the rest.

The first of the Seven Days battles was The Battle of Oak Grove. McClellan had finally decided to move forward to initiate a siege, and the foundation of this battle was to get closer to the city of Richmond. He sent two divisions across a swampland called White Oak Swamp.

What ultimately prompted McClellan to take action was the intelligence he received indicating that Lee was poised to launch an attack. Additionally, he became aware that Major General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson's corps was on its way from the Shenandoah Valley. In light of this information, McClellan resolved to initiate an offensive before Lee could execute his own plans. Had McClellan demonstrated greater effectiveness in his approach, it is conceivable that he could have disrupted Lee's intended maneuvers. The Union's assault originated from the left flank, which was the opposite flank Lee intended to target the following day.

McClellan's strategy involved advancing closer to the city limits to commence siege operations. He aimed to reposition his siege artillery approximately a mile and a half nearer to the target, selecting Old Tavern near Nine Mile Road due to its advantageous elevation. However, to reach this location, he first needed to secure Oak Grove, situated to the south of Old Tavern. Oak Grove consisted primarily of a cluster of oak trees in proximity to Seven Pines. Given the ongoing skirmishes in the area since the previous battle, it was expected that this would be his initial objective. The terrain between the opposing lines featured a dense forest that extended for 1,200 yards and was characterized by swampy conditions.

To lead the assault, McClellan appointed his two most seasoned commanders, Joseph Hooker and Philip Kearny. The brigades were commanded by Daniel Sickles, Cuvier Grover, and John Robinson. While Grover and Robinson made commendable progress, Sickles, positioned on the right flank, found himself amid the swamp and faced significant Confederate resistance. This situation resulted in a distortion of the line. A Confederate brigade under Ambrose Wright launched a counterattack in the center, forcing a retreat. An additional complication arose from uniform confusion, as one of Wright’s regiments donned red Zouave uniforms, leading Sickles’ troops to hesitate in firing upon them, having only encountered Union regiments in similar attire.

McClellan was situated at a considerable distance from the battlefield, located three miles behind the front lines, which foreshadowed the behaviors to come. His attempts to issue commands via telegraph were hampered by his lack of awareness regarding the unfolding events, leading him to panic and call for a withdrawal that left those present on the field perplexed. A prolonged pause of two and a half hours followed as the Union forces awaited McClellan's leadership on-site. Upon his eventual arrival and assessment of the situation, which he deemed less dire than anticipated, he instructed his troops to return to the swamp they had recently vacated, effectively placing General Heintzelman in a position of de facto command during the engagement.

The battle itself was relatively minor in scale, with the Union army managing to advance a mere 600 yards at the expense of approximately 600 casualties, resulting in an inconclusive outcome.

 

Battle of Mechanicsville or Beaver Dam Creek (June 26, 1862)

On the following day, Lee initiated a significant offensive. Confederate troops commanded by A.P. Hill launched an assault on the Union's right flank at Mechanicsville, specifically at Beaver Dam Creek. The Union forces, led by Fitz John Porter, were well-fortified and successfully repelled the Confederate attack, resulting in substantial casualties for the attackers. The strategic objective of this assault was to compromise the Union's right flank near the Chickahominy River, as a collapse in this area would have jeopardized the integrity of the entire Union line.

From the outset, the Confederates encountered difficulties. The initial plan involved Stonewall Jackson leading the attack; however, he failed to arrive on schedule, causing a significant delay. A.P. Hill, positioned and awaiting Jackson's signal, ultimately faced the dilemma of either continuing to wait or proceeding independently with his division and a brigade from D.H. Hill. Jackson's anticipated assault from across the river was a crucial element of the strategy, and the complexity of the plan proved challenging for Lee to manage among his dispersed commanders. Additionally, Union artillery inflicted severe damage on the Confederate forces, while Hill neglected to deploy his artillery. As a result, Hill's repeated assaults were largely ineffective, leading to numerous failed attempts. General Fitz-John Porter and V Corps, entrenched behind Beaver Creek Dam, successfully defended the area, suffering nearly 1,500 casualties in the process.

Stonewall Jackson did not appear when he was anticipated by the Confederates. Utilizing a railroad tunnel beneath the Blue Ridge Mountains, he had arrived earlier than expected and subsequently transported his troops to Hanover County via the Virginia Central Railroad. McClellan did expect Jackson at Mechanicsville. Intelligence reports had indicated that Jackson's forces were still in the Shenandoah Valley, which contributed to McClellan's decision to withdraw upon learning that Jackson had reached the battlefield. But Jackson's troops, having endured intense fighting in the Valley, were already fatigued, and their march to the front lines further drained their energy. At 3 PM, General Hill, growing impatient, launched an attack without explicit orders. When Jackson eventually reached the scene, he was unable to locate General Hill and decided to set up camp despite the ongoing sounds of combat. This incident marked the beginning of several missteps in his military conduct, with some attributing his inaction to narcolepsy, suggesting he may have succumbed to sleep due to exhaustion.

President Davis was present, observing the situation, and both he and Lee were perplexed by the ongoing attacks. Lee had anticipated that the offensive would commence only after Jackson made contact, which added to his confusion when the battle erupted in Jackson's absence. The persistent assaults by the Confederates were regarded as one of the significant miscalculations of the war, with Lee attributing the failure to Jackson.

The outcome of the battle seemed to indicate a clear victory for the Union forces. But in that critical moment, McClellan assessed that his right flank was indeed exposed, jeopardizing his supply line. Consequently, he initiated a withdrawal to the southeast, inadvertently granting Lee the strategic advantage. This retreat proved to be a considerable error, as the Union's defenses were robust, and the Confederates had incurred substantial losses, with approximately 1,500 casualties compared to 360 on the Union side. McClellan's failure to recognize the Confederate assault as a chance for a counteroffensive or to capitalize on Lee's divided forces led him to order Porter to retreat to a new position at Gaines’ Mill, forsaking the advantageous stance at Mechanicsville. A decisive counterattack against Lee's vulnerable forces could have potentially dismantled the Confederate right wing.

The Seven Days Battles. By Hlj, available here.

Battle of Gaines’ Mill (June 27, 1862)

Gaines' Mill stands out as the battle during the Seven Days Campaign that most clearly showcased General Lee's capabilities as a military leader. His approach was characterized by significant risk-taking, which underscored his aggressive command style and his readiness to pursue high-stakes opportunities. At this pivotal moment, Lee successfully gathered between 60,000 and 65,000 Confederate troops, while the Union forces, commanded by Fitz John Porter, comprised approximately 34,000 soldiers on the battlefield.

Lee’s perspective. After the indecisive Battle of Oak Grove and Lee’s attack on the Union right at Mechanicsville was repulsed with great losses, witnessed by his president, Lee might have been encouraged to proceed cautiously. However, Lee discerned a potential vulnerability, believing that a retreat following a battle that resulted in a Union victory indicated a strategic weakness. Seizing this opportunity, Lee initiated a formidable attack on Porter's isolated V Corps at Gaines' Mill, recognizing that Porter had retreated to that location and resolved to capitalize on the situation.

General Fitz John Porter and V Corps had been successful at Mechanicsville defending against Lee’s attack. In the pre-dawn hours of June 27th, McClellan issued a series of urgent directives to his commanders, instructing them to either relocate or abandon their supply trains and to retreat towards the James River, where they would establish a new supply base shielded by artillery support from naval gunboats. McClellan entrusted Porter, his most reliable subordinate, with the critical responsibility of maintaining the rearguard for the Federal army north of the Chickahominy River. Following these orders, Porter retreated eastward, securing a formidable position that overlooked Boatswain’s Swamp, a river boundary that was notably absent from Lee’s maps.

As Lee advanced, he encountered a well-fortified perimeter established by Porter’s forces. The Confederate commander launched renewed assaults, only to discover Union troops strategically positioned behind a stream that Lee had not expected to be present. Lee focused his efforts on the right flank of the Union Army, where General Porter and V Corps found themselves isolated on the northern bank of the Chickahominy River. While Richmond’s elite looked on, Confederate generals A. P. Hill and Richard S. Ewell charged up a steep hill, suffering horrific casualties. Despite Lee's commitment of all six divisions to frontal assaults, the attacks were poorly coordinated and initially failed to dislodge Porter’s men.

Longstreet directed four brigades against the Union left, while D. H. Hill and Richard Ewell also launched attacks across open terrain leading to the woods, brush, and swamps bordering the creek, all of which were met with fierce resistance. The situation shifted when Stonewall Jackson, arriving late and slow to engage, finally entered the fray. A massive frontal assault involving 32,000 men under A. P. Hill ensued, ultimately breaking the Union line. In the wake of this overwhelming offensive, Union commanders Slocum and Sykes were compelled to retreat, marking a significant turning point in the battle.

Gaines' Mill stands out as the sole battle that General Lee could genuinely regard as a tactical victory during the Seven Days Campaign, as the other encounters resulted in either defeats or draws. This battle is notable not only for its immediate outcome but also for its significant ramifications on subsequent military engagements throughout the Civil War. From a leadership perspective, Lee achieved success despite the Confederates' numerous unsuccessful assaults, culminating in a final, coordinated offensive that ultimately shattered the Union defenses.

General Lee undertook significant risks during this battle, notably by dividing his forces against a numerically superior opponent. He concentrated a substantial contingent to launch an assault on the Union's right flank at Gaines’ Mill while assigning a smaller group to defend Richmond and hold back McClellan’s remaining troops south of the Chickahominy River. This strategic division left Richmond vulnerable to potential Union attacks, particularly if McClellan had chosen to exploit this opportunity rather than retreat. A counteroffensive toward Richmond might have overwhelmed Lee’s fragmented forces, jeopardizing the Confederate capital.

Additionally, Lee ordered a large-scale frontal assault against the Union's fortified position on a ridge, which was well-defended by artillery and natural barriers. Such assaults are historically known for their high costs and challenges. The initial Confederate attacks resulted in significant casualties, and further attempts risked not only demoralizing his troops but also depleting his forces without achieving a breakthrough. Furthermore, Lee's strategy relied heavily on the timely arrival of Stonewall Jackson’s corps to strike the Union flank; however, delays due to fatigue and confusion left Lee's initial maneuvers unsupported. By committing nearly all available Confederate units to the battle at Gaines’ Mill, Lee left himself with few reserves to address unexpected developments, which could have severely weakened his army and compromised the defense of Richmond had the assault failed.

Despite the staunch resistance encountered, the Union lines eventually faltered, compelling General McClellan to withdraw across the Chickahominy River. Lee's victory might have been even larger were it not for Jackson's misdirected march and poor staff work. The major assault that Lee unleashed at 7 p.m. breaking the defense could have occurred three or four hours earlier, which would have put Porter in jeopardy, before the reinforcements arrived and obviating the benefit of the cover of darkness.

Lee’s gamble at Gaines’ Mill paid off. His aggressive tactics overwhelmed the Union defenses late in the day, forcing McClellan to retreat across the Chickahominy River and abandon his advance on Richmond. While costly, the victory demonstrated Lee’s willingness to take calculated risks to achieve strategic objectives, a hallmark of his leadership throughout the war.

John Bell Hood led the Texas Brigade that led the charge that broke the Union line near the Watt house. Hood himself survived unscathed, but over 400 men and most of the officers in the Texas Brigade were killed or wounded. He broke down and cried at the sight of the dead and dying men on the field. After inspecting the Union entrenchments, Maj. Gen Stonewall Jackson remarked, "The men who carried this position were truly soldiers indeed."

Jackson was late for a multitude of reasons. During the opening stages of the battle, his men were led down the wrong road, which resulted in an hour-long countermarch. Once on the right road, Jackson’s men encountered roadblocks and sharpshooter fire, which delayed his men even further. By the time Jackson arrived on the field, A.P. Hill’s men were already engaged with the Federals.

Porter had faced multiple waves of attacks and managed to maintain his position. Nevertheless, in order to sustain his defense, he required additional troops. The bulk of McClellan’s forces were stationed across the Chickahominy River, while Jackson’s division was lagging behind, having lost its way en route to the battlefield. After successfully repelling a series of Confederate offensives throughout the afternoon, Porter made a request for reinforcements. McClellan, albeit reluctantly, dispatched only Slocum’s division, which allowed Lee to effectively organize his attacks and finally bring Jackson into the fray. With 16 brigades, totaling approximately 32,000 men, Lee launched an assault against a similarly sized defensive force. As the evening progressed, Porter’s line began to falter, leading to a retreat towards the Chickahominy River.

By 7 p.m., Lee's entire Confederate contingent was assembled and ready to engage the Federal lines. The attack on June 27th, led by A.P. Hill, represented the largest offensive of the Civil War, with over 30,000 troops participating. This assault was nearly twice the size of Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg and exceeded Winfield S. Hancock’s attack at the Mule Shoe during the Battle of Spotsylvania, as well as the Confederate charge at the Battle of Franklin.

Despite having a numerical advantage overall, McClellan failed to provide adequate support to Porter during the conflict. While Lee focused nearly his entire army on Porter, McClellan left a significant portion of his forces inactive on the southern bank of the Chickahominy River, thereby missing a critical opportunity to strike at Richmond or Lee’s rear. By bolstering Porter with a substantial number of troops or initiating a simultaneous offensive across the river to target Lee’s left flank, McClellan could have altered the course of the battle and potentially delivered a decisive blow to Lee’s forces. He could have even opted to send a considerable contingent directly to threaten Richmond itself.

Lee’s victory at Gaines' Mill saved Richmond and the Confederacy in 1862.  V Corps had been defeated. Two entire Union regiments were surrounded and had to surrender. The tactical defeat led McClellan to retreat. He believed he was in a trap, caught between two rivers. He declared publicly that his campaign against Richmond was over. When General Grant was in almost the same position in 1864 after the Battle of Cold Harbor (the battlefield is almost adjacent), he did not let the opportunity slip away.

 

Garnett’s & Golding’s Farm (June 27–28, 1862)

While the battle at Gaines's Mill raged north of the Chickahominy River, the forces of Confederate General John B. Magruder conducted a reconnaissance in force that developed into a minor attack against the Union line south of the river at Garnett's Farm. To escape an artillery crossfire, the Federal defenders from Maj. Gen. Samuel P. Heintzelman’s III Corps refused their line along the river.

The Confederates attacked again near Golding’s Farm on the morning of June 28 but were easily repulsed. These "fixing" actions heightened the fear in the Union high command that an all-out attack would be launched against them south of the river. The action at the Garnett and Golding farms accomplished little beyond convincing McClellan that he was being attacked from both sides of the Chickahominy. McClellan had decided to retreat to his base at the eastern end of the Peninsula on the James River. He called it a “change of base”, but for him, the campaign was over.

Magruder once again employed a ruse of making a lot of noise and marching his men in circles conspicuously to convince McClellan that he had a lot more men than he did. He was clever to recognize that something so simple could be so successful. General Magruder’s nickname was “Prince John” for his dramatic manner and his interest in the theater. His dress and attitude were flamboyant and intended for showmanship. He learned the value of deception in the Mexican War. He had goaded General Butler into attacking him at Big Bethel. He understood intuitively that when intelligence is lacking, commanders make decisions irrationally, and can be deceived by noise and shadows.

Brig Gen Robert Toombs, who had resigned as the Confederate Secretary of State due to his disagreements with the President, was ordered to create a diversion.  Instead, the movement turned into a sharp attack. Winfield Scott Hancock led the defense against the attack and stopped it cold.

The two farms were situated close to the Seven Pines battlefield, with Fair Oaks Station located just to the south. These farms can be found approximately a few miles roughly northwest relative to the train station, which lies south of the Chickahominy River. The strategic situation involved General Lee launching a vigorous assault on the Union's right flank in the north while merely feigning an attack on the Union's left. Despite this tactical deception, General McClellan chose to retreat, a decision that was particularly perplexing given the significant losses incurred to secure that territory initially.

 

The rationale behind McClellan's retreat is difficult to comprehend, as he had several more advantageous alternatives available for a potential repositioning. The retreat necessitated the movement of not only his infantry but also a considerable amount of artillery, including 16 siege guns, along with 3,800 wagons and over 2,500 cattle. Viable options for alternative bases included White House Landing and West Point, advancing towards Fort Monroe, or maintaining his position on the right while planning an offensive against Richmond. Opting to move south across the Peninsula towards the James River not only represented a strategically weak choice but also posed logistical challenges due to the limited road access in that direction, providing Lee with the opportunity to launch an attack on McClellan's rear guard.

 

Battle of Savage’s Station (June 29, 1862)

McClellan's over-reactions during the encounters at Mechanicsville and Golding's Farm, which, were not classified as defeats yet prompted withdrawals, captured Lee's attention. Recognizing a potential opportunity to destroy McClellan's entire army, Lee formulated a comprehensive plan for pursuit. It is important to highlight that this approach was notably aggressive; he could have simply declared victory without further action. However, Lee was in the hunt of a more significant objective.

To execute his strategy, Lee dispatched the divisions of James Longstreet, A. P. Hill, and Theophilus H. Holmes to the southeast, positioning them to target McClellan's left flank. He instructed Stonewall Jackson, who was leading his division, along with the divisions of D. H. Hill and Brigadier General William H. C. Whiting, to repair a bridge over the Chickahominy River and subsequently launch an attack on McClellan's forces from the north. Additionally, Lee commanded Brigadier General John B. Magruder to advance his division along the Richmond and York River Railroad to engage McClellan's rearguard.

As McClellan found himself in a full retreat, he left behind a rearguard consisting of three corps: Brigadier General Edwin V. Sumner’s 2nd Corps, Brigadier General Samuel P. Heintzelman’s 3rd Corps, and Brigadier General William B. Franklin’s 6th Corps, stationed near Savage’s Station. Interestingly, McClellan did not designate an overall commander to oversee the operations of his rearguard, which could have provided a more coordinated defense during this critical battle.

Savage’s Station was a stop on the Richmond and York River Railroad, acting as a depot for McClellan’s supply lines. This location also hosted a Union field hospital, where medical personnel attended to approximately 2,500 soldiers who had sustained injuries during the Battle of Gaines’ Mill. As Magruder’s division advanced eastward along the railway, the Federal forces were engaged in preparations for evacuation, systematically destroying any supplies that could potentially benefit the Confederates.

On June 29, at 9 a.m., Magruder initiated combat with Sumner at Orchard Station, located two miles west of Savage’s Station. Although Sumner's forces outnumbered the Confederates by a margin of 26,000 to 14,000, Magruder anticipated reinforcements from Jackson on his left flank and Huger’s division on his right. However, Jackson failed to arrive on time, having misunderstood his orders and remained positioned north of the Chickahominy River, while Huger was not present on Magruder’s right as expected.

Concerned that his outnumbered troops might be vulnerable to a Federal assault, Magruder sought additional support. In response, General Lee provided him with two brigades from Huger’s division, stipulating that these reinforcements would need to be returned if no attack occurred by 2 p.m. As the designated time arrived and elapsed without incident, Magruder was compelled to send back the additional forces. Confronted with the challenging situation of engaging a significantly larger enemy contingent, he opted to delay his offensive until 5 p.m.

There were rumors regarding Magruder's potential consumption of alcohol, largely stemming from his distinctive character, although substantial evidence to support these claims is lacking. At this critical juncture, he issued a series of perplexing orders for an assault, which may have been influenced by morphine administered to alleviate severe indigestion. This possible impairment in judgment led to the issuance of unclear and hesitant commands, resulting in less than half of his available troops participating in the subsequent confrontation.

With no overall commander in charge of the federal rear guard, Heintzelman decided that two divisions were enough to hold off Magruder and unilaterally marched his men south to join the main army, without informing Sumner or Franklin. After learning of Heintzelman’s departure, Sumner’s directives proved even more cautious than Magruder’s. When Magruder finally attacked, Sumner deployed only ten of his twenty-six regiments during the engagement.

After several hours of intense fighting, the engagement concluded around 9 p.m. as darkness fell and violent thunderstorms erupted. While the combat was fierce at times, the outcome remained ambiguous. The Confederates incurred approximately 450 casualties, whereas the Federals faced nearly 900 losses; however, General Magruder was unable to dislodge General Sumner from his position.

That evening, General Lee sent a dispatch to Magruder expressing his disappointment regarding the lack of progress made in pursuing the enemy: “GENERAL, I regret much that you have made so little progress today in pursuit of the enemy. In order to reap the fruits of our victory the pursuit should be most vigorous. I must urge you, then, again to press on his rear rapidly and steadily. We must lose no time, or he will escape us entirely.” Despite Lee's insistence, Sumner managed to evade capture. Anticipating the arrival of Jackson during the night, McClellan instructed Sumner to withdraw from Savage’s Station, leaving behind 2,500 soldiers and medical personnel at the Union field hospital. By noon the following day, the majority of McClellan’s army had successfully crossed the White Oak Swamp, thereby eluding Lee’s encirclement.

 

Battle of Glendale (June 30, 1862) & Frayser’s Farm or White Oak Swamp

Following the defeat of the Union V Corps at Gaines’ Mill on June 27, General McClellan made the strategic decision to abandon his campaign aimed at capturing Richmond. He directed his forces southward toward the James River, seeking refuge and resupply from the naval vessels stationed there. Meanwhile, General Lee recognized McClellan's retreat and perceived an opportunity for a significantly larger victory.

On June 30, three divisions of Confederate troops converged on the retreating Union army at the crossroads near Glendale. Major Generals James Longstreet and A. P. Hill initiated assaults both north and south of Long Bridge Road, targeting the V Corps Pennsylvania Reserves division commanded by Brigadier General George A. McCall. In response, the II Corps division under Brigadier General John Sedgwick, along with the III Corps divisions led by Brigadier Generals Phil Kearny and Joseph Hooker, moved to reinforce McCall. Despite their efforts, Longstreet and Hill managed to momentarily breach the Federal line and capture McCall.

Lee attempted to orchestrate a coordinated strike against the Union rear as McClellan's forces retreated toward the James River. However, the Confederate forces suffered from a lack of coordination once again. Longstreet, in particular, deployed his troops in a fragmented manner rather than as a unified assault. Huger was expected to be part of one of four attacking columns aimed at the Union lines, traveling along the Charles City Road with William Mahone in the lead. Unfortunately, they encountered a blockade of felled trees just two miles away. Although the obstruction could have been cleared within a few hours, Mahone proposed the construction of a two-mile parallel road through the woods. This decision ultimately prolonged their advance, as the Union army continued to fell more trees along the route, preventing Huger from reaching the intended position.

Maj. Generals James Longstreet and A. P. Hill successfully breached the Federal defenses, leading to the rout of the Pennsylvania Reserve division along with other brigades. Their advance brought them close to the Frayser farm, which is situated near the residence of R. H. Nelson. In response, Union forces, commanded by Brig. Generals Joseph Hooker and Phillip Kearny, launched counterattacks that effectively safeguarded the Union's line of retreat along the Willis Church Road. By nightfall, the Federals managed to maintain control over this critical route, which provided access to the remainder of the Union army, allowing them to withdraw to a more defensible position at Malvern Hill.

In terms of troop strength, the Confederates had a slight numerical advantage over the Union forces, with approximately 45,000 soldiers compared to 40,000. The casualty figures were nearly equal, with both sides suffering around 3,700 losses. This engagement, like many others, ended inconclusively, with the Union army narrowly averting a potential disaster.

At Glendale, General Lee's strategic ambitions faltered. General Magruder spent the day maneuvering in the rear of the Confederate Army without engaging in the attack. Meanwhile, General Jackson remained north of the White Oak Swamp, preoccupied with a futile artillery exchange with the Army of the Potomac's VI Corps. Despite the discovery of viable fords by some of his officers, Jackson's inaction during the intense fighting nearby left Longstreet and A. P. Hill's divisions to shoulder the primary burden of the battle. Although their initial assaults succeeded in breaching General George McCall's division and even capturing McCall himself, Union forces under Generals Hooker, Kearny, and Sedgwick managed to halt their advance. The fierce combat, characterized by hand-to-hand encounters, continued until darkness descended, ultimately preventing Longstreet and Hill from seizing the crucial crossroads and allowing McClellan’s army to maintain a strong defensive position against Lee’s disorganized attacks.

While the battle was tactically inconclusive, it represented a strategic victory for the Federal forces. General Lee was unable to fulfill his goal of obstructing the Federal retreat and significantly damaging or annihilating McClellan's army. In contrast, despite suffering substantial losses, the Federal troops successfully repelled the Confederate attacks, enabling the majority of the Army of the Potomac to safely navigate through and establish strong defensive positions at Malvern Hill.

McClellan's absence from the battlefield was once again evident, as he delegated the management of the conflict to his subordinates. During the Battle of Glendale he remained five miles away, positioned behind Malvern Hill, lacking telegraphic communication and too far to effectively direct his forces. His focus appeared to be on retreating to the James River, which ultimately represented a lost opportunity for the Union. A more assertive approach at Glendale could have dealt a significant blow to Lee's army and possibly curtailed the Confederate pursuit. General Porter assumed the role of the de facto field commander during this engagement.

 

Malvern Hill (July 1, 1862)

On July 1, 1862, after enduring six days of intense combat, the Army of the Potomac made its way to the James River. With confidence bolstered by the presence of nearby naval gunboats, Major General George McClellan's forces established a position on Malvern Hill, situated one mile from the river at an elevation of 130 feet. McClellan took decisive action by fortifying the hilltop with artillery batteries to protect the open fields below, while strategically positioning his infantry with the V Corps on the western slope and the III and IV Corps on the eastern side, ensuring a robust reserve in the rear. Confederate General Robert E. Lee aimed to weaken the Union defenses through a sustained artillery barrage prior to launching an infantry assault. At approximately 1:00 p.m., both armies commenced an artillery exchange, which ultimately proved to be largely ineffective.

Over four hours, a series of miscalculations in strategy and communication led to three unsuccessful frontal assaults by Lee's forces, which charged across open terrain without the support of Confederate artillery. This approach, characterized by direct infantry attacks against well-fortified Union positions, proved ineffective in the context of modern warfare, where artillery and rifled weapons had transformed combat dynamics.

As Lee directed his infantry to advance, the attacks lacked proper coordination, resulting in staggered assaults that faltered before reaching the hill's summit. The initial charge was led by General Lewis Armistead, who found his forces immobilized midway up the hill. Following this, General Magruder launched an attack with his division, which included brigade leader General Barksdale. Initially hesitant due to the perceived ineffectiveness of the artillery fire, D.H. Hill delayed his support for two hours before finally ordering his men to engage in five separate, uncoordinated attacks.

The Union's defensive position was formidable, featuring nearly one hundred artillery pieces strategically positioned along the plateau's summit, with an additional 150 guns held in reserve, complemented by three infantry divisions prepared for combat. In contrast, the Confederate forces were only able to concentrate a maximum of 15 artillery pieces on each flank, which were swiftly neutralized by the Union's superior artillery. The lack of effective communication and ambiguous orders among the Confederate ranks led to devastating losses. The effectiveness of the Federal artillery proved to be the pivotal element in the conflict, successfully repelling every Confederate assault and securing a tactical victory for the Union.

About 55,000 soldiers took part on each side, employing more than two hundred pieces of artillery and three warships. The battle resulted in over 5,600 casualties for the Confederates, representing approximately 10% of their forces, while the Union experienced about 3000 casualties. D.H. Hill, witnessing the devastation, expressed his dismay by stating that the events on the battlefield resembled murder rather than warfare. Surveying the carnage on the bloody field, he remarked disgustedly, “it was not war, it was murder.”

During the Battle of Malvern Hill, General McClellan was on a gunboat, the USS Galena, which at one point was ten miles away, down the James River. His distance rendered him incapable of effectively managing the battle, leading to criticism during the 1864 presidential campaign, where editorial cartoons mocked his preference for the safety of the vessel while conflict raged nearby. Consequently, the responsibility for commanding the army fell to Brigadier General Fitz John Porter, the commander of the V Corps.

Brig Gen Henry Hunt, emerged as the pivotal figure in this confrontation. Colonel Hunt was on McClellan's staff at Malvern Hill and is credited for the gun placement at Malvern Hill. Lt. Col. Webb probably assisted him. Hunt played a crucial and decisive role through his masterful use of artillery. Though not a frontline combat commander in the traditional sense, his contributions at Malvern Hill were pivotal to the Union victory. Hunt selected and arranged about 250 Union cannons on high ground at Malvern Hill, using the terrain to his advantage. He deployed 40 pieces of artillery along the ridge by Willis Church road, covering every direction the Confederates would attack. He established overlapping fields of fire and positioned batteries so they could mutually support one another and repel infantry assaults. He insisted on fire discipline, ordering that cannons only fire at optimal range and at designated targets, not in an uncontrolled barrage. This preserved ammunition and ensured maximum effectiveness during Confederate charges.. While the Union gunboats contributed somewhat, it was Hunt’s artillery placement that resulted in victory. General Lee proceeded with his assaults without conducting a thorough reconnaissance of the enemy's defenses. Undertaking such an assessment would have necessitated at least a half-hour journey to the front lines. Aware that this was his final opportunity to confront McClellan, Lee relied heavily on the intelligence provided by his subordinates, which historians believe may have underestimated the fortifications.

The engagement at Malvern Hill was a definitive victory for the Union forces. Following multiple failed attempts to penetrate the Union defenses, General Lee decided to cease further attacks as darkness descended, effectively concluding the battle. Simultaneously, McClellan directed his troops to retreat toward Harrison’s Landing along the James River, thereby marking the conclusion of the Peninsula Campaign and the Seven Days Battles.

 

Summary & Implications

“I, Philip Kearny, an old soldier, enter my solemn protest against this order for retreat. We ought instead of retreating should follow up the enemy and take Richmond. And in full view of all responsible for such declaration, I say to you all, such an order can only be prompted by cowardice or treason.”

When General Lee assumed leadership of the Army of Northern Virginia following the wounding of General Joseph E. Johnston, the Union army was perilously close to Richmond, just four miles away. Lee successfully repelled Union forces, preventing their advance toward Richmond,. The defeat for the Union in the Peninsular Campaign not only delayed their victory for two years but also resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives.

Over a single week, Lee orchestrated a series of daily engagements in a rapid campaign. Employing a strategy he would later replicate, he audaciously split his smaller army to launch attacks at multiple locations, compelling McClellan to retreat from Richmond and back down the peninsula. The ambitious campaign of the so-called 'Young Napoleon' ultimately faltered, while Lee's actions preserved Richmond. McClellan's forces remained at Harrison’s Landing for several weeks, ultimately returning to Washington with little to show for their efforts.

The Seven Days had produced unimaginable carnage. It had been the bloodiest week in American history up to that time, producing more than 34,000 casualties (19,000 Confederate, 15,000 Union). The reversal of fortune represented the first significant turning point in the conflict. For nearly a year, the Union forces, particularly in the Western Theater, had advanced with seemingly unstoppable momentum toward victory, and had even reached the outskirts of Richmond. As news circulated, both Americans and international observers began to form expectations about the war's conclusion, with The New York Times suggesting that hostilities might cease by Independence Day.

However, the events of June 1862 revealed that the Confederate cause had merely been waiting for a leader of exceptional skill to change its trajectory. The emergence of such leadership altered the dynamics of the war, demonstrating that the outcome was far from predetermined. The initial confidence in a swift Union victory was challenged, as the realities of warfare unfolded, reshaping the perceptions and strategies of both sides in the ongoing conflict.

While McClellan’s army performed well tactically in several engagements, particularly at Mechanicsville and Glendale, his reluctance to act decisively and his fixation on retreating to a secure position cost him the chance to gain ground at any of the Seven Days Battles. A more aggressive commander might have turned one or more of these battles into a decisive Union victory, potentially ending the Peninsula Campaign on favorable terms. McClellan had opportunities to achieve significant victories, but his cautious approach and mismanagement of certain engagements prevented him from capitalizing on these moments.

The retreat made Lincoln so angry that he suspended McClellan from command of all the armies, leaving him only the Army of the Potomac. McClellan blamed the War Department, Lincoln, and the Secretary of Defense for his defeats. McClellan distanced himself from his defeat. During the last engagements of the Seven Days, he boarded a gunboat on the James River, watching events from afar and letting one of his corps commanders, Fitz-John Porter, lead the fighting. Typically, McClellan blamed others for the setback. He bitterly wrote to Stanton: ‘If I am to save this army, it will be no thanks to you or any other person in Washington. You have sacrificed this army.’

Although Lee deserves the accolades he has received as a master tactician for taking an aggressive stance with a smaller force to ward off a much larger one, the military reality is that all of these fights were essentially draws; one was a Rebel victory, at least two more of a Union victory. And the losses were staggering. General Lee did not yet have his subordinates in control. At this stage of the war, no one had the experience or expertise needed to coordinate complex offensives, especially in an army with a brigade-centered structure. That was about to change.

Nevertheless, Robert E. Lee’s decision to adopt an aggressive approach during the Seven Days Battles was informed by a combination of strategic insight, intelligence, and a keen understanding of his opponent. Lee calculated that aggressiveness would succeed. He recognized that George B. McClellan was a cautious and risk-averse commander. McClellan’s hesitation to act decisively during the Peninsula Campaign gave Lee confidence that an aggressive strategy could unnerve and outmaneuver him. Lee understood that McClellan was more likely to retreat than to respond with bold counterattacks.

Confederate Intelligence also played a role. Lee had access to information that revealed McClellan’s slow movements and defensive mindset. Confederate cavalry commander J.E.B. Stuart’s famous ride around McClellan’s army in mid-June 1862 provided valuable reconnaissance, showing that McClellan’s flanks were exposed and his forces were spread thin. Lee believed that McClellan would not expect an offensive campaign from a Confederate army that was perceived as outnumbered and on the defensive. By taking the initiative, Lee hoped to disrupt McClellan’s plans and seize the psychological advantage. Lee understood the importance of logistics to McClellan’s campaign. By attacking his supply lines, he threatened the entire army beyond a large battle, compelling McClellan to abandon his advance on Richmond.

 

Aftermath

General Kearny would be killed later that year at the Battle of Chantilly.

General Hancock emerged as an essential figure, significantly influencing the Union's triumphs at both Gettysburg and the Overland Campaign. In 1880, he sought the presidency as the Democratic Party's nominee but was narrowly defeated by James Garfield, another former Union general, with a margin of just 39,000 votes out of a total of 8.9 million cast.

Robert Rodes participated in the battles of South Mountain and Antietam, later playing a pivotal role at Chancellorsville and Gettysburg before being killed at Third Winchester. He is often regarded as one of the most promising Confederate major generals whose potential was not fully realized, having received his training at VMI rather than West Point, which was favored by President Davis.

Benjamin Huger was deemed too old for command and pushed out, to the trans-Mississippi. His failures to appear in a timely way were interpreted as a lack of initiative.

General Magruder was banished to command in the far west. Lee had no tolerance for anyone who couldn’t control himself, and flamboyance would seem to be the antithesis of General Lee. Histories of the war often assert that Magruder was prone to drunkenness on duty and that his actions at Savage’s Station allowed a large portion of the AoP to escape. There isn’t much documentation of his being inebriated, and as the narrative suggests, there were plenty of mistakes made by just about everyone involved in this battle. He spent the remainder of the war administering the District of Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona and the Department of Arkansas; in his tenure, Magruder lifted the naval blockade over Galveston and recaptured the city in 1863. After surrendering the Trans-Mississippi Department in June 1865, Magruder fled to Mexico. He worked in an administrative role under Emperor Maximillian I before returning to the United States in 1867.

D.H. Hill served with distinction in these battles; however, his temperament did not align with that of General Lee. Consequently, he was assigned the task of defending Richmond during the forthcoming campaign. Following the incident known as the Lost Order at Antietam and the death of his brother-in-law, Jackson, at Chancellorsville, Hill found himself once again stationed in Richmond for the Pennsylvania Campaign before being reassigned to General Bragg in the Western Theater. This pattern of leaving behind those he could not rely on was characteristic of Lee's approach to commanders he deemed untrustworthy.

The performance of Stonewall Jackson during the Seven Days battles was notably poor. He arrived late at Savage's Station and failed to utilize fording sites to cross White Oak Swamp Creek at Glendale, instead spending hours attempting to reconstruct a bridge. This miscalculation resulted in a limited contribution to the campaign, as he was relegated to an ineffective artillery exchange and missed a critical chance to make a decisive impact. His absence left A.P. Hill and Longstreet to fend for themselves in their assaults. The great Stonewall Jackson was essentially a non-factor in this particular campaign.

Longstreet, in the Peninsula Campaign, had operational command of over half the Confederate Army, but his efforts had a mixed impact, with great successes and failures. Longstreet’s biggest contribution in the Peninsula was to help General Johnston conduct a sound retrograde back toward Richmond, and try to improve the organization and command and control of the only brigade centric Confederate army in a time when both sides were still learning how to put together effective units and then fight them together. When Lee took over some of this had been done, and Longstreet helped Lee to reach a good divisional structure.

As the command structure evolved, Longstreet and Jackson were formally appointed as Lee's immediate subordinates, serving as Corps commanders, while A.P. Hill's reputation significantly improved in Lee's eyes. The centralization of command proved to be an effective strategy for managing an army with a smaller staff. These adjustments in leadership would mark a period of remarkable success for Lee's army over the next eleven months, ultimately leading to some of General Lee's most notable achievements on the battlefield.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

 

 

References

·       Matthew Spruill, Decisions of the Seven Days. Knoxville, University of Tennessee Press, 2021.

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/gaines-mill

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/10-facts-battle-gaines-mill

·       https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/seven-days-battles/

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/seven-days-battles

·       https://www.historynet.com/details-bridging-the-chickahominy-river.htm 

·       https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1116765.pdf

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/seven-days-battles

·       https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/battle-of-oak-grove/

·       https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/battle-of-savages-station/

·       https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/gainess-mill-battle-of/

·       James M McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1988.

·       Shelby Foote, The Civil War: A Narrative. Volumes 1-3. Random House, 1963.

·       Crenshaw, Doug. Richmond Shall Not Be Given Up: The Seven Days' Battles, June 25–July 1, 1862.Emerging Civil War Series. El Dorado Hills, CA: Savas Beatie, 2017.

The Tokugawa period of Japan limited foreign trade beginning in the 17th century. For example, Chinese traders were restricted to the port of Nagasaki or through indirect routes like the Ryūkū Islands. Dutch traders also became the only Europeans allowed to enter Japan. Similarly, Japanese people were not permitted to go abroad. Those who resided in another country and returned to Japan could face the death penalty. These policies lasted for over 200 years. Yet, at least one Japanese person made it to the United States and back again during this time.

Michael Mirra explains.

Manjiro Nakahama.

Five Fishermen from Japan

On Japan’s island Shikoku, a 13-year-old boy named Manjirō lived in a village called Nakanohama (now part of the city Tosashimizu). His father had died when he was eight or nine years old. To support his mother and siblings, Manjirō got a job on a fishing expedition. The crew consisted of three brothers named Fudenojo (37), Jusuke (24), and Goemon (15), and their neighbor Toraemon (25). They set sail on January 5, 1841 in search of either bonito, mackerel, or tuna. The trip was expected to last only a few days.

A storm hit the five fishermen on the second or third day. They were about twenty miles from the coast of Japan. Fighting the wind while trying to make it back to land, their sculling oarlock broke off and soon their sculling oar broke in half. Propelling the boat was no longer in their control.

The boat was blown off course for three or four days and the fishermen ran out of provisions. Around January 13th, they finally spotted an island. It was the small and uninhabited Izu-Torishima (also known as “Bird Island”) a few hundred miles from the mainland. They were unable to find a beach to land the boat and decided to swim for it. Right before jumping in, a high wave overturned the boat and injured Jusuke’s leg, but all made it to land.

Manjirō turned 14 years old a couple of weeks later as the crew attempted to survive on the island. Fudenojo cared for Jusuke in their cave shelter while the others searched for food. Shellfish and seaweed could be gathered. Albatross were also plentiful until their migration season began in late April or early May. However, there was no spring water or edible plants on land.

 

A Ship from New England

On June 27th, a whaling ship appeared near the island. The John Howland had sailed from New Bedford, Massachusetts and was now sending two boats to the island in search of turtles to eat. As the boats approached, its members noticed Goemon, Manjirō, and Toraemon waving their clothes attached to sticks and shouting for help. The whalers could not understand anything that the trapped fishermen were saying, but recognized that they were distressed and hungry. All five castaways were taken aboard.

From there, the John Howland sailed to the north Pacific in search of whales for oil and baleens. Unlike Japanese whalers, the Americans discarded the rest of the whale. Through attempted sign language and eventually learning some English words, the rescued fisherman were able to communicate with the whalers and were given chores aboard the ship. Manjirō was assigned to the crow’s nest to look for whales in the distance. He was successful at least once and was given a seaman’s cap as a reward from the ship’s captain, William H. Whitfield.

Heading east, the John Howland stopped at Oahu (then part of the independent Kingdom of Hawai’i ruled by Kamehameha III) on November 20th. It was still not known to the Americans where the fishermen were from. Whitfield brought them to a medical missionary, Dr. Gerrit P. Judd, who reasoned they were Japanese after showing them Japanese coins.

Arrangements were made for the fishermen to stay in Honolulu. However, Whitfield wished to take Manjirō with him to the United States. Accepting the offer, Manjirō left Oahu on December 1st. Whitfield renamed him “John Mung” with “John” coming from the ship’s name and “Mung” being a shortened version of Manjirō. The John Howland continued to hunt for whales and stopped in Guam in March of the following year before finally heading back to Massachusetts.

 

Life in America

It was on May 6, 1843 that the John Howland reached New Bedford. Whitfield led the now 16-year-old Manjirō to his home in the neighboring town of Fairhaven. Shortly afterward, Whitfield married his second wife, Albertina. The couple had become engaged before Whitfield’s whaling voyage. Whitfield’s first wife, Ruth, had died while he was at sea a few years earlier. The wedding to Albertina, however, was held at the home of Whitfield’s uncle in New York. He left Manjirō in the care of a friend named Eben Aiken until he returned. A teacher named Jane Allen also began tutoring Manjirō to prepare him for the upcoming school year.

Upon returning from the wedding, Whitfield bought a farm in the Sconticut Neck part of Fairhaven. Living there gave Manjirō the opportunity to learn how to ride a horse. Manjirō was then enrolled in the nearby Bartlett School where he studied math, navigation, and surveying. He went on to apprentice as a cooper–crafting and repairing barrels and casks–in New Bedford.

New Bedford was generally viewed as a place of acceptance partly because its people lived and worked with the inclusive whaling industry. It was also seen as a safe-haven for freed and escaped slaves–notably Frederick Douglass. Unfortunately, this sentiment was not always extended. Members of a Congregational church disapproved of Manjirō sitting in the Whitfield family pew. The Whitfields responded by joining a more accepting Unitarian church. Coincidentally, one of the Unitarian church’s members was Warren Delano Jr. who later spoke about Manjirō to his grandson, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

 

The Journey Home

After he had turned 19 years old, Manjirō was asked to join a whaling ship by Ira Davis who had been the harpooner on the John Howland and was now the captain of the Franklin. On May 16, 1846, they took an eastern route to the Pacific via the Cape of Good Hope to avoid impacts of the Mexican-American War on the Cape Horn route.

Almost a year later, in March of 1847, the Franklin stopped in Guam. It was there that Manjirō wrote to Whitfield about the ship’s plans to sail to the Ryūkyū Islands, which were not yet annexed by Japan but an independent vassal state. He expressed hope at opening a whaling port there. The Franklin arrived in May and Manjirō acted as an interpreter. However, he was unable to understand their dialect and returned to the ship.

In October of 1848, the Franklin stopped in Honolulu and Manjirō was reunited with the castaway fishermen. Fudenojo had changed his name to Denzo to make it easier for the locals to pronounce. He and Goemon had recently come back from an unsuccessful attempt at returning to Japan. Toraemon was working as a carpenter. Sadly, Jusuke had died five years earlier.

The Franklin arrived back in New Bedford on September 23, 1849. The three year plus trip had earned Manjirō $350. At this time, news of gold in California reached him. There was no doubt that Manjirō missed his mother. If he made enough money in the gold industry then he could afford to take a passenger ship to the Pacific and maybe find his way back to Japan. Two months later, he took a job on the Stieglitz, which was carrying lumber to San Francisco.

Arriving in the spring of 1850, Majiro began looking for gold near Sacramento. He earned $600 in about seventy days. Heading back to San Francisco, he booked a passenger ticket to Honolulu on the Eliza Warwick, which left on September 17th.

Manjirō met with his old friends in Honolulu. Denzo and Goemon agreed to go with him back to Japan. Toraemon, however, wished to stay in Honolulu since he was successful as a carpenter and had married a local woman.

The next step was to purchase a small boat. A friend of Whitfield’s named Reverend C. Damon spread the story of the three fishermen hoping to return home and asked for donations. With his help, the fishermen bought a boat that they named the Adventurer.

Now the fishermen had to get the Adventurer close to Japan. To do this, they brought their small boat onto the Sarah Boyd, which was headed for China on December 17, 1850. As the Sarah Boyd passed the Ryūkyū Islands on its way to China, the three fishermen lowered the Adventurer into the water. They rowed home on February 2, 1851.

The Adventurer landed on Okinawa, which was controlled by the daimyō of the Satsuma Province on Kyūshū. The three fishermen were soon taken by Satsuma officials to the city of Naha for interrogation. In the meantime, they were put under house arrest.

After this period of interrogation, the fishermen were moved from Okinawa to Kyūshū–in the city of Kagoshima and then Nagasaki–to be interrogated by Tokugawa officials. They were finally set free in June of 1852 and made it to their respective homes in October.

Manjirō found his mother still alive. Although, she had long thought he had died. Their reunion lasted for three days, for Manjirō was called to the city of Kochi to teach English to samurai among others.

 

Japan-United States Relations

The following year, the American Commodore Matthew C. Perry arrived at the harbor of Uraga with four warships. He was carrying a letter from President Millard Fillmore that demanded Japan open its ports to the outside world. The shogunate ordered Manjirō to Edo (Uraga is located at the entrance of Edo Bay–now Tokyo Bay) to provide information on the United States. In response to his service, Manjirō was given samurai status at the end of the year. He then adopted a surname, Nakahama, after his home village. Japan signed the Treaty of Kanagawa with the United States on March 31, 1854 putting an end to its isolation.

Manjirō put his English language knowledge to other uses. In 1857, he translated Nathaniel Bowditch’s The New American Practical Navigator into Japanese. He also authored the first English text to be published in Japan, A Shortcut To Anglo-American Conversation, in 1859. Around this time, he taught English to future leading dramatist Fukuchi Gen’ichirō.

1859 saw a story similar to Manjirō, but with the roles reversed. An American named John Mercer Brooke was commanding a surveying expedition in the Pacific aboard the Fenimore Cooper. This time it was the Americans that were shipwrecked as a typhoon destroyed the ship off the coast of Yokohama.

Japan happened to be looking for an experienced navigator to help bring an embassy to San Francisco on its way to Washington, D.C. Brooke accepted the job at Japan’s request. He chose nine American crew members and the draftsman Edward Meyer Kern from the Fenimore Cooper to join him.

Brooke boarded the Kanrin-maru, a Dutch ship that had been purchased by Japan two years earlier for approximately $70,000. It escorted an American warship, the Powhatan, that carried the embassy. The Kanrin-maru, however, carried a samurai “Magistrate of Warships” named Kimura Toshitake. Should something happen to the Powhatan, it would be Kimura’s responsibility to represent Japan in Washington. The translator on the Kanrin-maru was Manjirō.

Apart from Manjirō, none of the Japanese crew members had been on a sea voyage before. The ship faced a storm right after leaving Yokohama. Together, Brooke and Manjirō taught the inexperienced crew how to manage their vessel. The ship’s captain, another samurai named Katsu Rinatarō, soon became ill from seasickness and delegated the running of the ship. Despite these trials, both ships made it to San Francisco safely on March 17, 1860.

Japan treated this voyage as a test of their naval capabilities. Katsu would go on to become the chief architect of the Imperial Japanese Navy, which was formally created in 1869.

 

A Return to Whaling

Japanese whaling soon evolved in two ways. First, whalers searched for new shore stations. This indirectly aided colonial expansion, so the government offered financial backing to whalers. Second, foreign whaling techniques were incorporated, which eventually influenced modern Japanese whaling. These two evolutions intertwined around Korea where Japan competed with Russia and where fin whales were so fast that they could only be caught by Norwegian whaling technology.

The city of Hakodate welcomed foreign whaling ships into its harbor so the Japanese could observe their techniques. Around 1862, Manjirō started an American-style whaling operation out of Hakodate. He went on to help the government bring whaling to the Ogasawara Islands (known as the Bonin Islands to the British). He had previously visited the islands on a whaling expedition after the government grew concerned that American, European, and Hawaiian colonizers–who had encroached on the territory in 1830–were getting more use from the whales than Japan. This expedition was ultimately shortened by a typhoon. Manjirō returned in 1863 for more whaling. However, Japan abandoned its plans for a few years due to expenses and pressure from foreign powers.

Manjirō was sent on another diplomatic mission that stopped in the United States and Europe in 1870. While docked in New York City, Manjirō took a train to Massachusetts where he visited Whitfield. His American homes, both Fairhaven and New Bedford, became sister cities with his native home, Tosashimizu, in 1987.

On a final note, a 21-year-old Herman Melville left New Bedford on the whaling ship Acushnet two days before Manjirō went fishing in 1841. This trip was the genesis for his novel Moby-Dick in which he wrote, “If that double-bolted land, Japan, is even to become hospitable, it is the whale-ship alone to whom the credit will be due; for already she is on the threshold.” Moby-Dick was published the same year that Manjirō returned to Japan.

 

Did you find that piece interesting? If so, join us for free by clicking here.

 

 

Works Cited

Arch, Jakobina. “Birth of a Pelagic Empire: Japanese Whaling and Early Territorial Expansions in the Pacific.” Across Species and Cultures: Whales, Humans, and Pacific Worlds, edited by Ryan Tucker Jones and Angela Wanhalla, University of Hawai’i Press, 2022, pp. 93–110. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13568102.8. Accessed 10 June 2025.

“Herman Melville.” National Park Service, https://www.nps.gov/nebe/learn/historyculture/hermanmelville.htm. Accessed 10 June 2025.

Huffman, James L. “The Clash of Two Worlds: 1841–1868.” Politics of the Meiji Press: The Life of Fukuchi Gen’ichirō, University of Hawai’i Press, 1980, pp. 1–31. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9zckgw.5. Accessed 10 June 2025.

Kitadai, Junji. “The Saga of Manjirō.” Education About Asia, vol. 19, no. 2, 2014. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/the-saga-of-manjiro. Accessed 10 June 2025.

“The Manjiro Story.” Whitfield-Manjiro Friendship Society, https://whitfield-manjiro.org/the-manjiro-story. Accessed 10 June 2025.

“Nakahama Manjiro.” The Millicent Library, https://millicentlibrary.org/NakahamaManjiro. Accessed 10 June 2025.

Taketani, Etsuko. “Samurai Ambassadors and the Smithsonian Institute in 1860.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 115, no. 3, 1995, pp. 479–81. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/606225. Accessed 9 June 2025.

Uenuma, Francine. “The Shipwrecked Teenager Who Helped End Japan’s Isolationist Era.” Smithsonian, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-shipwrecked-teenager-who-helped-end-japans-isolationist-era-180982199. Accessed 10 June 2025.

Yanaga, Chitoshi. “The First Japanese Embassy to the United States.” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 9, no. 2, 1940, pp. 113–38. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3633080. Accessed 10 June 2025.

Young, Dana B. “The Voyage of the Kanrin Maru to San Francisco, 1860.” California History, vol. 61, no. 4, 1983, pp. 264–75. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/25158123. Accessed 10 June 2025.

The American Civil War had a number of critical junctures in 1862. Here, Lloyd W. Klein considers the 1862 Peninsula Campaign and The Seven Days Battles. In part 1 of a 2-part series, he looks at the Peninsula Campaign, including the Battle of Fair Oaks/ Seven Pines.

General Meagher at the Battle of Fair Oaks, Virginia. June 1, 1862.

‘If General McClellan is not going to use the army, I would like to borrow it for a time.’

Abraham Lincoln

 

As 1861 transitioned into 1862 without any notable military engagements in the Eastern Theater, President Lincoln's patience began to diminish in response to General McClellan's delays. In March 1862, hesitant to engage in a direct confrontation due to concerns about being outnumbered, General McClellan opted for a strategic flanking maneuver via water. His plan involved landing troops on the Yorktown Peninsula, situated between the James and York Rivers, while utilizing the Union Navy to safeguard his supply lines. From this position, he intended to launch an offensive against Richmond. Consequently, 70,000 Federal troops embarked on vessels bound for Fort Monroe, a Union stronghold at the Virginia Peninsula's tip, while an additional 35,000 troops under Irvin McDowell repositioned to Fredericksburg, located 50 miles north of Richmond. Furthermore, approximately 25,000 soldiers were available in the Shenandoah Valley under the command of Nathaniel P. Banks.

In the spring of 1862, General McClellan initiated an advance of Union forces westward from Fort Monroe. The Confederates, benefiting from their interior lines between General Johnston's army near Manassas and the Peninsula, effectively maneuvered their forces to bolster the troops stationed on the Peninsula. President Lincoln harbored doubts regarding this strategy, fully aware that Johnston would likely respond by mobilizing his army to protect Richmond, a movement that would occur more swiftly than McClellan's own. Nevertheless, recognizing that McClellan was finally taking action, Lincoln reluctantly acquiesced to the plan.

 

Yorktown & Williamsburg

By early April, McClellan was in position. At the campaign's onset, he faced approximately 20,000 Confederate troops near Yorktown, Virginia, the site of Cornwallis's surrender to Washington. The town is located on the York River. With a significant advantage of at least three to one, McClellan was poised for success, especially with an additional 30,000 Federal reinforcements expected to arrive shortly. However, he mistakenly convinced himself that he was up against 200,000 Confederates, leading to inaction on his part.

The Confederate field commander, Major General John Bankhead Magruder, a graduate of West Point, was acutely aware of his disadvantage. In a strategic move, he opted to deceive McClellan by frequently repositioning his troops and dispersing his artillery into single units that fired intermittently. This tactic created the illusion of a much larger force, successfully convincing McClellan to initiate a siege of Yorktown. This decision ultimately provided General Johnston with the necessary time to reinforce his beleaguered troops, effectively thwarting what could have been a decisive Union victory.

McClellan meanwhile awaited the reinforcements he deemed essential to beat an enemy he estimated to outnumber him by three times. Even a basic acquaintance with the 1860 Census would have made clear that was impossible. As McClellan awaited the reinforcements he believed were crucial to confront an enemy he grossly overestimated, he overlooked the opportunity. In reality, Magruder commanded only 11,000 men. Although escaped black slaves who reached Union lines provided accurate information regarding Confederate troop numbers, their accounts were dismissed and not taken seriously by McClellan.

In choosing to lay siege to Yorktown, McClellan miscalculated the situation, believing that Johnston's entire army was positioned against him. This decision resulted in a significant loss of momentum and tactical advantage for the Union forces. Between April 18 and May 2, the Union Army established fourteen distinct positions. McClellan offered various justifications for his reluctance to engage in battle, citing the inexperience of his troops, inadequate supplies, and the necessity of securing Washington from potential surprise attacks. Finally, Magruder abandoned Yorktown after 2 weeks of delaying McClellan.

Following the Confederate withdrawal from Yorktown, the Union division under Brigadier General Joseph Hooker encountered the Confederate rearguard in the vicinity of Williamsburg. Williamsburg is positioned on elevated terrain between the York and James Rivers. Hooker launched an assault on an earthen fortification situated along the Williamsburg Road; however, his forces were repelled. Confederate counterattacks, orchestrated by Major General James Longstreet, posed a significant threat to the Union's left flank. Fortunately, a Union division arrived in time to reinforce the position, marking the Battle of Williamsburg as the first major engagement of the Peninsula Campaign.

Brigadier General Philip Kearny's 3rd Division of III Corps played a crucial role in stabilizing the Federal position, with Kearny famously leading his men onto the battlefield with his sword drawn and reins clenched in his teeth, a technique he had mastered during his training with the French cavalry. Kearny was a seasoned veteran, having distinguished himself in the Mexican War and served in Napoleon III’s Imperial Guard at Solferino, despite having lost his left arm in combat.

In a strategic maneuver, a Union brigade advanced to threaten the Confederate left flank by occupying two abandoned redoubts. Despite receiving multiple orders to withdraw, the brigade's commander resolutely held his ground against enemy attacks and subsequently led a bayonet charge in a counteroffensive. This courageous brigade was led by Brigadier General Winfield Scott Hancock, who earned a reputation for his steadfastness and refusal to retreat. General McClellan praised Hancock's performance as “superb,” a commendation that led to his enduring nickname, “Hancock the Superb.” His leadership and bravery during the battle solidified his status as a remarkable figure in the Union Army.

The battle saw approximately 41,000 Union troops face off against 32,000 Confederates, resulting in an inconclusive outcome that allowed the Confederates to continue their retreat.

 

Movement up the Virginia Peninsula: McClellan and the Slows

‘If he had a million men, he would swear that the enemy has two millions, and then he would sit down in the mud and yell for three.’

Secretary of War Edwin Stanton

 

With Richmond as his primary objective, McClellan recognized that a direct land route would necessitate traversing swamps and wetlands during the late spring season. Consequently, he opted to navigate along the Pamunkey River, which flows northward and runs approximately parallel to the Chickahominy River, until he reached the point where he needed to cross it to approach Richmond.

The pace of McClellan's advance was notably sluggish. A significant factor contributing to this delay was his anticipation of support from McDowell’s Corps, which was advancing southward from Fredericksburg to assist in the offensive. However, McDowell was ultimately redirected to the Shenandoah Valley, creating what appeared to be a favorable opportunity for McClellan to initiate his own movements.

McClellan's reliance on inaccurate intelligence reports, provided by his associate Allan Pinkerton, who was the founder of a prominent private detective agency, led him to consistently overestimate the size of the Confederate forces across the Potomac River. He believed that the enemy was now twice as numerous as his own troops. However, the reality was quite the opposite; the Union army outnumbered the Confederate forces by a ratio of at least two to one and perhaps three to one.

In hindsight, it is evident that these delays yielded no strategic advantages.  Particularly regarding the situation at Yorktown, the postponement allowed Johnston to reposition his army effectively. Consequently, McClellan lost the chance to secure an unobstructed route to Richmond and failed to outmaneuver Johnston, resulting in the forfeiture of any potential benefits that could have arisen.

McClellan's tendency to exaggerate the size of enemy forces was so consistent that it suggests a deliberate, possibly psychological, motivation behind his actions. This pattern of inflating enemy troop numbers was a defining characteristic of McClellan's military career. For instance, he claimed to have defeated double the actual number of troops at Rich Mountain, thereby enhancing the perception of his victory. Furthermore, he tripled the count of opposing forces across the Potomac, which contributed to a heightened sense of urgency and ultimately led to his promotion to commander-in-chief. The culmination of this behavior was evident during the Peninsula Campaign, where he significantly overstated enemy numbers, expressed concerns about the resources needed for victory, and when unable to secure those resources, proceeded with operations while attributing any failures to his superiors. This strategy allowed him to portray himself as a victor against overwhelming odds or to deflect blame in the event of defeat.

Despite being provided with accurate assessments of troop strengths, McClellan chose to disregard critical intelligence. He was given correct numerical information by escaped slaves. General John Wool at Fortress Monroe thought he was too slow and gave him more precise numbers Thaddeus Lowe and the Balloon Corps, stationed near Gaines’ Farm, consistently reported the movements of Confederate forces near Fair Oaks, delivering precise information even up to June 1. The reasons behind McClellan's dismissal of these reports remain speculative, but they align with the psychological tendencies previously discussed, suggesting a disconnect between the available intelligence and his strategic decisions.

In a controversial move, Lincoln opted to redirect McDowell's forces from a southern advance to the Valley to support Fremont, despite objections from both McClellan and McDowell. This decision, while aimed at addressing the vulnerability of Washington and providing necessary assistance to Fremont, may have had adverse consequences. Lincoln's judgment was sound in recognizing the threat posed by Jackson's movements, which ultimately led to Jackson retreating further into the Valley to join forces with Lee. However, had McDowell continued his advance, he would have positioned himself advantageously alongside Porter’s V Corps along the Chickahominy River, potentially countering Lee's strategic plans effectively.

The Peninsula Campaign: March to May 1862. Source: Hlj, available here.

Battle of Fair Oaks / Seven Pines (May 31 and June 1, 1862)

General Joseph E. Johnston, known for his cautious approach, conducted a methodical retreat through the Peninsula, engaging in inconclusive skirmishes along the way.  Recognizing his numerical disadvantage, the Confederate army executed a retreat to the northwest, successfully crossing the Chickahominy River, which served as the sole natural barrier separating the Peninsula from Richmond. A Union naval expedition aimed at advancing up the James River toward Richmond had been halted at Drewry’s Bluff, a situation that Johnston adeptly exploited by positioning his right flank at that location. Additionally, he stationed A.P. Hill at the extreme left flank along a bend in the Chickahominy, compelling McClellan to cross the river to reach Richmond. While a segment of the Union army managed to cross, other units remained stationed to the east of the river.

Until this point, President Davis had perceived Johnston's caution as a liability, urging him to take the offensive against McClellan. However, Johnston, fully aware of his inferior numbers, was strategically waiting for an opportune moment to strike an isolated portion of McClellan’s army. At this juncture, two Union corps had successfully crossed the Chickahominy River and were positioned alarmingly close to Richmond, just four miles away, where they could hear the ringing of church bells.

As the Union forces positioned themselves on either side of the seemingly tranquil river, a deluge of rain ensued, resulting in severe flooding that rendered the river and surrounding swamps nearly impassable. This natural disaster effectively divided the Union army; despite the proximity of the two factions, their only means of communication was a bridge located several miles away. Seizing the opportunity presented by the fragmentation of McClellan's forces, Johnston planned to strike the contingent of the Union army stranded south of the river. In a calculated move, he could potentially deploy 22 of his 29 brigades, totaling approximately 51,000 troops, against the III and IV Corps, which together comprised 33,000 soldiers.

During the Battle of Seven Pines, also known as Fair Oaks, which took place from May 31 to June 1, 1862, General Johnston launched an assault against the vulnerable corps stationed there. The offensive occurred at two key locations: the railroad station at Fair Oaks and the crossroads of Seven Pines, situated approximately one mile apart. Although the attacks lacked coordination, they proved to be effective, with General D.H. Hill spearheading the offensive and directing all available reinforcements to the front lines.

The resultant attack was uncoordinated. Johnston launched an offensive against two Union corps that were positioned separately across the Chickahominy River, effectively cut off from the main body of the Union army. His strategy was intricate, yet he failed to provide clear instructions to his commanders regarding the intended sequence of events. The plan involved a demonstration by his left flank while Longstreet was to approach from three different directions, one of which included DH Hill’s division tasked with assaulting a critical crossroads near a cluster of seven large pines, known as Seven Pines.

However, Longstreet deviated from the intended route, mistakenly taking the Williamsburg Road instead of the Nine Mile Road. While some of his troops found themselves in the correct location, they were uncertain about the timing of their assault. Ultimately, only DH Hill’s division, comprising approximately 10,000 soldiers, engaged Silas Casey’s brigade of merely 6,000, resulting in a significant breakthrough. Despite Johnston being a mere 2.5 miles from the front lines, he was unable to hear the sounds of battle due to an acoustic shadow, which hindered his ability to send reinforcements in a timely manner.

Amid this pivotal confrontation, General Johnston was wounded while actively leading his troops. A veteran present at the scene recounted the chaos, stating, "… every deadly projectile which could take a human life and maim and disfigure were showered upon us." As bullets and artillery shells flew around him, a bullet struck Johnston in his right shoulder, followed by a shell explosion that sent a fragment into his chest, causing him to fall unconscious from his horse. He suffered a broken shoulder and two fractured ribs, and his aides promptly transported him to safety, where he eventually regained consciousness.

Upon regaining consciousness, Johnston immediately requested the retrieval of his sword and pistols, which had fallen during his fall. He expressed the sentimental value of the sword, stating, “The sword was the one worn by my father in the Revolutionary War, and I would not lose it for ten thousand dollars.” Drury Armistead of the 3rd Virginia Cavalry bravely ventured back to recover the items. In the meantime, Major General Gustavus Smith assumed command, but the renewed attack lacked the necessary vigor. The following day, General Lee took over leadership, with McClellan expressing a preference for Lee over Johnston.  This misapprehension was due to Lee's early struggles at Cheat Mountain, which led McClellan to question Lee's decisiveness under pressure.

The outcome of the battle was indecisive. The Union forces managed to hold their ground, allowing McClellan to continue his advance toward Richmond. The casualties were substantial, with Union losses totaling 5,031 (including 790 killed, 3,594 wounded, and 647 captured or missing) and Confederate losses amounting to 6,134 (with 980 killed, 4,749 wounded, and 405 captured or missing). This engagement was the second largest and bloodiest battle of the war thus far, following the Battle of Shiloh just eight weeks prior.

Brig Gen OO Howard lost his right arm at Fair Oaks. General Philip Kearny famously quipped that they’d now be able to shop for gloves together, as General Kearny had lost his left arm. Brig Gen Robert Rodes was wounded, and Col John B Gordon took command. Rodes would return to lead his brigade at Gaines’ Mill.

Seven Pines could have been a decisive Confederate victory, but several things went wrong.

Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston had an opportunity to achieve a decisive victory, but a combination of poor planning, miscommunication, and logistical challenges prevented him from doing so. While Johnston’s plan had the potential for success, its execution fell short, and the battle ended inconclusively. The Union advance was stopped but Seven Pines was a missed Confederate opportunity.

Why Johnston Could Have Won Decisively. The Chickahominy River divided the Union Army, with two corps (approximately 33,000 men) on the south side near Seven Pines and the rest of McClellan’s army on the north side. Johnston’s plan aimed to overwhelm the isolated Union corps south of the river before McClellan could reinforce them. This was a sound strategy that could have inflicted a crippling blow on the Union army. Johnston had massed about 51,000 Confederate troops against the Union forces south of the Chickahominy. This gave him a significant numerical advantage in the immediate area, which he hoped to exploit. Johnston planned to strike early on May 31, taking advantage of heavy rains that had swollen the Chickahominy River and delayed Union reinforcements from crossing.

Why Johnston Failed to Achieve a Decisive Victory. Johnston's strategy for the attack required meticulous timing and effective coordination among various Confederate divisions. Unfortunately, the execution of this plan was hampered by ambiguous orders and failures in communication, which resulted in considerable delays and confusion on the battlefield. Additionally, prominent Confederate generals, including James Longstreet and D.H. Hill, misinterpreted their directives, leading to fragmented and disorganized assaults instead of a unified offensive. Longstreet's absence from the battle maps exemplifies this miscommunication, as he mistakenly directed his troops down an incorrect route, inadvertently encountering Benjamin Huger's forces and contributing to the overall chaos. If General Huger had led his division into action at the appointed time and supported Smith Longstreet and Hill, Keyes' Union Corps would have been destroyed. Consequently, the planned morning attack was postponed until the afternoon of May 31, affording Union forces additional time to fortify their defenses.

Johnston should have made better use of Magruder's division. If the Chickahominy had remained high enough to stop Union reinforcements, a different outcome would be expected. If there had been no delay of Longstreet's troops at Gilles Creek, or on the Williamsburg road, or if, at least, if Johnston had been informed when Longstreet did go into action, perhaps the victory could have been more complete. Good staff work and prompt reports would have offset the acoustic shadow and enabled the timely advance of the Confederate left.

The Union troops, under the command of Generals Erasmus Keyes and Darius Couch, demonstrated considerable resilience despite being outnumbered. Their steadfastness allowed them to hold their positions long enough for reinforcements to arrive from the northern side of the Chickahominy River. The timely intervention of Union General Sumner with additional troops played a crucial role in stabilizing the situation. Although the Confederates succeeded in pushing back Union forces in certain sectors, they failed to take advantage of openings in the Union lines, resulting in a missed opportunity for a decisive breakthrough. Instead, the conflict devolved into a protracted and bloody stalemate, undermining the initial Confederate objectives.

A decisive Confederate victory could have severely disrupted McClellan's Peninsula Campaign. Had McClellan been compelled to retreat, the subsequent Seven Days Battles might have been averted, further hindering Union advances toward Richmond. However, the inconclusive nature of the battle ultimately paved the way for General Lee's ascension to command and the ensuing series of confrontations known as the Seven Days Battles, which would shape the course of the conflict.

McClellan continued to cross the river, bringing all of his troops except V Corps and he continued to plan on a siege. His emotional reaction, told in a letter to his wife, was "I am tired of the sickening sight of the battlefield, with its mangled corpses & poor suffering wounded! Victory has no charms for me when purchased at such cost."

After the battle, mosquitos surrounded the area from the rains and floods. Soldiers on both sides became severely ill with an infection whose origin has never been entirely explained. Chickahominy Fever had symptoms of both typhoid fever and malaria, so it is officially classified as a typhomalarial fever, but has at times also been called bilious fever.  It was most likely a form of malaria with GI predilection, or both malaria and typhoid fever, hence the name. It may also have included cases of dengue fever and perhaps shigellosis.

 

Lee Takes Command

Jefferson Davis encountered numerous challenges during his presidency, often making questionable decisions. However, on the evening of May 31, 1862, as he accompanied General Lee from the battlefield to Richmond and entrusted him with command of the army, Davis undoubtedly made the most astute choice of his presidency.

On June 1, 1862, General Lee assumed command amidst the ongoing battle at Seven Pines. Lee prioritized the long-term strategy over immediate victory, focusing on conserving his remaining forces and devising a new plan. He utilized the battle as an opportunity to reorganize his command structure, removing two brigadiers and rearranging the brigades to enhance their effectiveness.

This period marked the Union Army's closest approach to potentially concluding the war for the next two years. Despite the demoralization of Johnston's troops and the inadequately fortified defenses of Richmond, the well-equipped Union forces under Major General George B. McClellan, who outnumbered Lee's army, failed to mount a serious assault on the Confederate capital. With McClellan positioned between the defenses of Richmond and the Chickahominy River, Lee and Davis engaged in discussions to determine the most effective course of action, with Lee outlining three strategic options: abandon Richmond, prepare for a siege, or launch an attack. His recommendations aligned perfectly with President Davis's expectations.

In the three weeks after taking command, Lee undertook a comprehensive reorganization of his forces and reinforced the defenses of Richmond. He recognized that a purely defensive strategy would be inadequate against the formidable Federal army. Rather than passively waiting for an inevitable attack that he might not withstand, Lee also deemed it unwise to precipitate a siege, a decision that would later contrast sharply with his actions two years hence. Instead, he devised an audacious and strategic plan to take the initiative.

On June 23, Lee convened a meeting with his generals to unveil his intentions for an offensive operation. He articulated his strategy in General Order No. 75, which was disseminated to his commanders the following day. Lee's approach to dislodge the largest army ever assembled in the New World was grounded in a keen assessment of the Federal forces and their vulnerabilities. He posited that the sheer size of the Federal army could be turned into a disadvantage.

The primary goal of Lee's plan was to separate McClellan's main army, which was concentrated south of the Chickahominy River, from its supply lines. McClellan's forces required over 600 tons of provisions daily, presenting a significant logistical challenge akin to sustaining a small city. To execute his strategy, Lee stationed a minimal force to defend Richmond's eastern perimeter while moving the majority of his troops northward across the Chickahominy. His objective was to overwhelm the Union forces near Mechanicsville, whose responsibility was to safeguard the critical Federal supply base. By disrupting their resupply efforts, Lee aimed either to secure a decisive victory over McClellan or compel him to retreat from Richmond.

Lee ordered three separate columns to commence their march on the same morning. Each column was to utilize its own designated route, and engagement in combat would only occur if the commander identified a strategic advantage. This advantage was inherently linked to the performance of the other columns; however, the failure of one column did not obligate the others to engage. General Magruder was tasked with leading 25,000 troops stationed to the east of Richmond, who would serve as defenders should the offensive strategy falter. Major Generals James Longstreet, A.P. Hill, and D. H. Hill were to concentrate their divisions on the left flank of the Confederate line, preparing to assault the right side of the Union forces. The offensive at Mechanicsville aimed to push the enemy southward. Meanwhile, General Jackson's Army was to conduct a covert march to join Lee's forces and target the right rear flank. Brigadier General W. N. Pendleton was given the directive to deploy the reserve artillery and to thwart any attempts to advance on Richmond.

Lee's efforts extended beyond mere planning; he utilized the time to assess the viability of his strategy. He instructed JEB Stuart to conduct a reconnaissance mission to evaluate the vulnerability of the Union army's right flank. On the morning of June 12, Stuart embarked with 1,200 cavalrymen and confirmed the flank's susceptibility. After a comprehensive 150-mile journey around the Union forces, he returned on June 15 with 165 captured Union soldiers, along with 260 horses and mules, in addition to various quartermaster and ordnance supplies. The Union cavalry, which was more decentralized and commanded by Stuart's father-in-law, Col. Cooke, posed little serious resistance, resulting in only one casualty among Stuart's men. This successful maneuver not only bolstered morale but also elevated Stuart's status to that of a celebrated figure within the Confederacy, comparable to Stonewall Jackson, as he was welcomed in Richmond with flower petals strewn in his path.

Concurrently, McClellan grew increasingly apprehensive about the fragility of his supply line. The intelligence gathered from Stuart's raid proved invaluable to Lee. Although the threat to the Union supply line was not as immediate, the reconnaissance revealed that the right flank was indeed vulnerable. Consequently, Stuart's findings guided Lee to recognize that the most strategically advantageous option was also the most tactically feasible, allowing him to capitalize on the Union's weaknesses effectively.

McClellan's Army of the Potomac remained inactive in their positions on the eastern fringes of Richmond. The three weeks that ensued after Seven Pines were largely uneventful. It is perplexing to understand why McClellan chose to remain idle for such an extended period, especially considering the recent change in Confederate leadership.

The 22 days that elapsed between Lee assuming command and formulating his strategy proved disastrous, primarily due to McClellan's inaction during this critical timeframe. He had various courses of action available to him, yet he hesitated in his campaign to capture Richmond during the latter half of June. His misjudgment regarding the strength of Confederate forces in the city deterred him from launching an assault. Instead, he sought additional troops, missing a significant opportunity between June 18 and June 25, when the Confederate defenses around Richmond were relatively vulnerable. McClellan's focus on establishing a new supply route from Harrison's Landing to the James River, intended to bolster his base on the Pamunkey River, ultimately allowed Lee the necessary time to implement his strategy effectively.

 

McClellan’s Psyche

General George B. McClellan was a charismatic yet arrogant individual, characterized by his diminutive stature and dapper appearance at the age of 34. Before he was appointed the commanding general of the Army of the Potomac, he had achieved victories in two minor skirmishes against Confederate forces in West Virginia. His self-assuredness in his capabilities was evident as he sought to emulate Napoleon, often posing for photographs with his hand tucked into his jacket and surrounding himself with French officers on his staff.

McClellan's Peninsula Campaign was characterized by an overabundance of caution. Despite possessing a numerical superiority, he exhibited a slow pace and hesitated to capitalize on his advantages, which allowed Confederate generals Johnston and Lee to strengthen their forces and successfully counter McClellan's efforts. His persistent indecision and reluctance to engage the enemy enabled the Confederates to summon reinforcements. This hesitance in command proved detrimental, as it enabled the Confederate forces to regroup and repel the advances of the Union army.

The primary shortcoming of McClellan as a military leader was his procrastination. His habitual delays in launching attacks were harmful, as they provided the Confederates with opportunities to regroup and fortify their positions. During the Seven Days Battles, General McClellan's cautious approach resulted in the withdrawal of his troops in response to General Lee's assaults, despite the Union's numerical advantage. This decision ultimately enabled Lee to mount a successful defense of Richmond, thereby avoiding a significant defeat that could have altered the course of the conflict.

McClellan's persistent belief that Lee commanded a much larger force than he did contributed to his overly cautious strategies. His inclination to prioritize the preservation of his army over seizing critical opportunities for decisive engagement allowed Lee to control the tempo and direction of the campaign. Furthermore, McClellan's absence from the battlefield during pivotal confrontations hindered effective communication with his subordinates, which in turn diminished the Union Army's capacity to capitalize on its strengths. While General Johnston sustained severe injuries in battle, McClellan remained detached from the frontline.

McClellan's propensity to postpone attacks suggests a tendency to over-plan rather than act decisively. These delays proved neither advantageous nor justifiable in the context of the campaign. His psychological disposition seemingly impeded his ability to take the initiative, revealing the inherent limitations of the Peninsula Campaign strategy. The operation required maneuvering a substantial army through challenging terrain, including swamps and rivers, and adverse weather conditions further hampered the Union's progress. McClellan's focus on securing supply lines and constructing necessary infrastructure, such as bridges, took precedence over swift movement, leading to significant logistical challenges for the Union forces on the Virginia Peninsula. The fact that he was now positioned to the east of Richmond meant that Washington, DC, to the north, was somewhat uncovered. McClellan faced political pressures and disagreements with President Abraham Lincoln and Secretary of War Edwin Stanton over this issue. Lincoln withheld some reinforcements, particularly the troops under General Irvin McDowell, to protect Washington, D.C. McClellan argued that this decision weakened his ability to launch a decisive offensive.

McClellan’s offensive strategy centered on a methodical siege of Richmond rather than a quick assault. He dedicated significant time to strategically placing his troops and mobilizing heavy artillery, aiming for a gradual and calculated campaign to seize the Confederate capital. In response, the Confederates, led by General Joseph E. Johnston, established formidable defensive structures surrounding Richmond. McClellan exercised caution regarding assaults on fortified positions, prioritizing the thorough preparation of his forces for what he anticipated would be a challenging confrontation.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

Posted
AuthorGeorge Levrier-Jones
Categories19th century

The recent collision of the Mexican Training Ship Cuauhtemoc into the Brooklyn Bridge was a tragedy – but it was also a historical collision. Michael Leibrandt explains.

A depiction of the bridge on opening in 1883: Bird's-Eye View of the Great New York and Brooklyn Bridge and Grand Display of Fire Works on Opening Night

If you’ve been blessed with the chance to see the last visually-stunning scene in Martin Scorsese’s cinematic marvelGangs of New York from 2002 — which was a gorgeous time-lapse walk through the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge and the evolution around it through the centuries — then you were no doubt immersed in the depiction of the development of New York but also the changing landscape of Green-Wood Cemetery overlooking the East River. 

Nearly one hundred and twenty people perished during the Draft Riots of 1863. The country was in the midst of the American Civil War — and the Union needed troops. The Army of Northern Virginia had been beaten at Gettysburg — and General George Meade was under scrutiny for not pursing Lee’s Army. General Ulysses S. Grant who would take command of the Union Army in 1864 — however — had other ideas. Grant was committed to win the war as quickly as possible.

No army under a Confederate banner would never again invade of the north. Their attempt at a decisive victory on northern soil to entice European countries like France and Britain to join the aid of the south had failed. The Union Army would utilize conscription to replenish their ranks and not everyone was eager to enlist.

A few weeks ago, not long after 8:00 P.M., the Mexican Training Ship Cuauhtemoc lost power on the East River and slammed into the Brooklyn Bridge killing two people and injuring nineteen. Masts were broken on the two-hundred seventy-seven person vessel but it was successfully determined that the Bridge did not sustain any damage. 

Although the Brooklyn Bridge was designed by John A. Roebling — his daughter-in-law (Emily Warren Roebling) was essential in keeping it on track for completion when her husband Washington Roebling became ill. It would be more thanten years until the Brooklyn Bridge was finally completed and opened. The 43-year old Mexican Navy Training Vessel ARM Cuauhtémoc dates back to 1982.

Back at Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn — which has roots going all the way back to 1838 — when it began life as a final resting place for overcrowded churchyards. It’s nearly 480 acres are home to more than 550,000 graves — including some of the most prominent 19th century families of New York which includes the Roosevelt’s and also famous people like Leonard Bernstein. The cemetery holds both Confederate and Union casualties, as well as Revolutionary Warsoldiers. It’s Gothic Revival Gates designed by Richard Upjohn — provide the warmth of a welcome in the summer months to this day.

For both the United States and Mexico — the collision a few weeks ago wasn’t just a collision. It was a collision of history for both nations.

Michael Thomas Leibrandt lives and works in Abington Township, PA.

Major General James Harrison Wilson served as a Union officer whose impact was felt in various capacities, particularly as an engineer, staff officer, and later as a skilled cavalry leader during the latter stages of the Civil War. His contributions often go unnoticed, despite his involvement in several pivotal roles that exemplify the capabilities of high-ranking Union officers.

Lloyd W Klein explains.

Major General James Wilson.

Born on September 2, 1837, in Illinois, Wilson graduated sixth in his class from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1860. He began his military career as a second lieutenant in the Topographical Engineers, receiving his initial assignment in the Department of Oregon.

 

Corps of Topographical Engineers

To fully appreciate Wilson's career shifts and achievements across seemingly unrelated positions, it is crucial to understand the role of topographical engineers. Upon graduating from West Point, he joined a prestigious and select army service. Being chosen for this Corps indicated a high level of skill and promise. Topographical engineers were tasked with producing intricate maps of battlefields and terrain, providing vital information for troop movements and strategic planning. Their responsibilities included surveying land to pinpoint advantageous locations for artillery and defensive structures, as well as overseeing the construction of fortifications and military roads. The maps they generated were essential for organizing supply routes and transportation, significantly influencing the strategies and outcomes of numerous battles by guiding commanders' decisions.

In times of peace, this specialized group was engaged in various critical infrastructure projects, such as building bridges, supervising lighthouse construction, maintaining harbors, and managing fortifications. With the onset of the Civil War, many members transitioned into combat roles, focusing on the development of entrenchments and fortifications while also creating essential maps. Their extensive experience in construction provided them with a solid foundation for making strategic decisions in the heat of battle. Notable Army Engineers from this era included figures such as George Meade, George McClellan, Andrew Humphreys, Robert E. Lee, P.G.T. Beauregard, and Gouverneur Warren.

The expertise of topographical engineers was not only vital during peacetime but became even more pronounced during wartime, as their skills directly contributed to military effectiveness. Their ability to assess and manipulate the landscape for military advantage played a crucial role in shaping the outcomes of engagements. As they adapted to the demands of combat, their contributions to both engineering and military strategy underscored the importance of their work in the broader context of the war. This unique blend of skills and experiences allowed individuals like Wilson to navigate diverse roles throughout their careers successfully.

 

Civil War 1861-Early 1864

As the Civil War began, he advanced to the rank of first lieutenant and took on the role of topographical engineer for the Port Royal Expeditionary Force. His involvement in the Battle of Fort Pulaski led to his promotion to major. Subsequently, he was assigned to the Army of the Potomac, where he served as aide de camp to Major General George McClellan while also fulfilling engineering duties. In this capacity, he participated in significant battles, including South Mountain and Antietam.

 Following McClellan's dismissal, he was reassigned to the Western Theater, joining Grant's Army of the Tennessee as a lieutenant colonel and engineer. During the Vicksburg Campaign, he held the crucial position of inspector general, overseeing the army's inventory and supplies. Given Grant's limited logistical expertise, he relied heavily on officers like Wilson to ensure that the campaign was well-supplied with food, ammunition, and equipment. The extensive supply line stretching from Jackson across the Mississippi River to St. Louis underscored the significant responsibilities entrusted to Wilson.

After the successful siege of Vicksburg, he was elevated to the rank of brigadier general of volunteers and continued to serve in staff roles during the Battle of Chattanooga. He was later appointed as the chief engineer for the forces dispatched to support Knoxville under Major General William T. Sherman. Throughout these various non-combat roles, it is evident that he was entrusted with substantial administrative responsibilities that were vital to military command and strategic planning. In 1864, he became the chief of the Cavalry Bureau, demonstrating his exceptional skills as an administrator.

In mid-January 1864, Wilson was appointed as the head of the newly established Cavalry Bureau, following a recommendation from Grant. He took on the challenge of transforming this previously ineffective and disorganized administrative office, which had been burdened by bureaucratic inefficiencies and outdated practices, into a well-functioning, resourceful, and reputable agency. Wilson dedicated himself fully to this role, maintaining a rigorous schedule from 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. daily, and often utilized his free time to ride along the capital’s defensive lines, engaging in discussions about enhancing cavalry administration with Assistant Secretary Dana, who was residing in the same boarding house.

 

Promotion to Combat Duty

Perhaps unexpectedly, General Grant elevated Wilson to command a cavalry division under Sheridan. This promotion was particularly remarkable given that Wilson had no prior experience in combat or in leading troops. However, Grant's decision proved to be astute, as it allowed Wilson to apply his administrative skills in a new and challenging context.

He played a significant role in both the Overland Campaign and the Valley Campaign of 1864.  Although Wilson encountered significant challenges in his early combat assignments, such as at the Wilderness and Third Winchester, his enthusiasm, determination, and innovative ideas shone through. Despite making notable mistakes, his energetic approach and confidence played a crucial role in his development as a leader in the field.

 

The Chickahominy River Crossing

His cavalry division did not accompany Sheridan during the raid on Trevilian Station. Instead, he took the lead in crossing the Chickahominy River as part of the march towards the James River, aiming to create a diversion within the broader Union strategy. This maneuver was designed to facilitate a crossing of the James River and allow Union forces to position themselves south of Lee’s army. By coordinating with the V Corps, he launched an offensive towards Richmond, targeting areas north of the James River near McClellan's previous battlefields. This tactic misled Lee into believing that Grant's primary assault would occur there, ultimately granting Grant additional time to finalize the crossing and initiate the offensive on Petersburg.

Wilson’s cavalry division was assigned the critical role of probing the Confederate defenses, collecting intelligence, and disrupting their supply chains. This mission involved securing vital crossings along the Chickahominy River and providing support for Union infantry movements. Wilson’s troops played a significant role in securing essential fords and river crossings, which was crucial for the Union's ability to navigate the difficult terrain. The Chickahominy was notorious for its flooding and marshy surroundings, presenting unique challenges for cavalry operations.

 

The Wilson-Kautz Raid

The Wilson-Kautz Raid was a Union cavalry operation conducted during the Civil War from June 22 to July 1, 1864, as part of the Petersburg Campaign. The raid was led by Brigadier General James H. Wilson and Brigadier General August V. Kautz. Its primary goal was to disrupt Confederate supply lines by targeting key railroads supplying Petersburg and Richmond.

The Union army, under General Ulysses S. Grant, was besieging Petersburg, Virginia. The railroads supplying Confederate forces in Petersburg and Richmond were vital for their survival. The raid aimed to destroy sections of these railroads to sever supply routes and weaken Confederate resistance. The primary targets were the:

·      South Side Railroad

·      Richmond and Danville Railroad

·      Weldon Railroad

.These raids were integral to the overarching Union strategy, designed to undermine the logistical capabilities of the Confederacy. By disrupting these supply lines, Wilson's actions contributed to the Union's efforts to weaken the Confederate war effort significantly. Initially the raid was successful: They successfully destroyed large sections of the South Side Railroad and Richmond and Danville Railroad, burning bridges, tearing up tracks, and destroying supplies.:

The chief action in this raid was a pivotal confrontation near the Staunton River. This engagement was marked by strategic maneuvers and the involvement of various forces, highlighting the intensity of the conflict during that period. On June 22, 1864, Wilson initiated a cavalry raid aimed at crippling the South Side and Richmond & Danville railroads, with a particular focus on destroying the vital railroad bridge spanning the Staunton River. Over the course of the first three days, his cavalry successfully dismantled 60 miles of track, set fire to two trains, and destroyed several railroad stations. Despite the efforts of Confederate General W. H. F. "Rooney" Lee to pursue the Union forces, he was unable to effectively counter their actions.

The battle saw Captain Benjamin Farinholt rallying nearly 1,000 local volunteers, including older men and boys, to confront Wilson's 5,000 well-equipped troops. Although Wilson's cavalry engaged in the fight dismounted, they ultimately faced defeat as "Rooney" Lee's cavalry arrived towards the end of the skirmish, forcing Wilson's troops to retreat.

On their return, Wilson and Kautz’s forces were intercepted by Confederate forces at the Battle of Sappony Church (June 28) and the Battle of Ream’s Station (June 29). At Ream’s Station, the Union cavalry suffered heavy losses as they were cut off and forced to abandon many of their men, horses, and artillery.

The outcome of the raid overall must be considered a tactical loss. While the raid inflicted significant damage on Confederate railroads, much of it was quickly repaired. The Union cavalry suffered heavy casualties, with over 1,500 men killed, wounded, or captured. The raid temporarily disrupted Confederate supply lines and forced them to divert troops to defend railroads. However, it did not achieve its ultimate goal of crippling Confederate logistics.

 

Transfer to the Western Theater

Sherman had no good choices when it came time to select a cavalry leader for the campaign that would go into legend as the March to the Sea. He had decided on a top-to-bottom reorganization of the various mounted corps reporting to him and, characteristically, brought in an outsider, Major General James H. Wilson, for the job. He needed to keep Wilson in Tennessee accomplishing that task, so to command the mounted force that would accompany his foot soldiers, Sherman had to choose from the roster of officers who had already failed him one or more times. He settled on a candidate that most observers would have rated a long shot at best: Brigadier General H. Judson Kilpatrick.

 

Battle of Franklin

At the Battle of Franklin (November 30, 1864), Wilson commanded the Union cavalry, playing a key role in protecting the Union army’s flanks and contributing to the Union victory during this pivotal engagement of the Civil War. Securing the Union flanks during the battle was critical in preventing Confederate cavalry under Major General Nathan Bedford Forrest from outflanking or cutting off the Union forces.

Wilson’s cavalry actively skirmished with Forrest’s forces, keeping them occupied and preventing them from effectively supporting the Confederate infantry assault. Although Forrest was a formidable opponent, Wilson’s well-equipped and disciplined cavalry successfully countered his maneuvers, limiting Confederate mobility. After the Union forces repelled the Confederate frontal assault, Wilson’s cavalry played a crucial role in covering the Union army’s retreat to Nashville, ensuring an orderly withdrawal without significant Confederate interference.

Wilson’s effective cavalry operations helped secure the Union position and contributed to the overall Confederate failure. By neutralizing Forrest’s cavalry, Wilson ensured that the Union army could focus on repelling Hood’s infantry assault without the added threat of encirclement or disruption of supply lines. Wilson’s leadership and the performance of his cavalry at Franklin showcased the increasing effectiveness of Union cavalry forces late in the war, particularly in countering Confederate cavalry operations. Wilson is one of the few Union officers to beat Forrest in battle, and he would do so again near the end of the war.

 

A Different Conception of Cavalry

Brigadier General Emory Upton was elevated to the position of division commander under General Sheridan and tasked with leading the Valley Campaign against General Early. During the course of battle, he sustained a severe injury that nearly resulted in the loss of his leg. Although he received another promotion, he ultimately had to relinquish command of his division. Subsequently, he was reassigned to Nashville, where he collaborated with Major General James Wilson to create a fundamentally different type of military unit. Both Upton and Wilson were innovative and ambitious officers who significantly contributed to the evolution of the Union cavalry into a more formidable fighting force, each recognized for their progressive strategies in warfare. 2. The concept they developed centered around a mobile strike force, consisting of 12,000 infantry equipped with Spencer breech-loading rifles. The strategy involved mounting the infantry on horses to advance into battle, then dismounting to engage in combat as traditional infantry. Upton's approach was to extend his idea of rapid assaults on fortified positions to broader military operations, while Wilson possessed the tactical expertise to implement these strategies effectively. This innovative thinking marked a pivotal transformation in cavalry operations.

Wilson's forces were equipped with breech-loading repeating rifles and employed combined arms tactics effectively. They expanded from a brigade-sized cavalry unit, as utilized by Sheridan at the Battle of Booneville, to a full cavalry corps. This strategy involved a significant number of troops dismounting to engage the enemy while mounted forces executed flanking maneuvers or direct assaults. Sheridan had previously implemented similar tactics, combining infantry and cavalry, at key battles such as the 3rd Winchester, Fisher's Hill, and Five Forks. The essence of this approach lay in the integration of horse-mounted soldiers with repeating rifles or carbines, creating an unprecedented combination of mobility and firepower.

In conflicts where cavalry units were often underutilized, combined with infantry, or assigned to logistical roles, Wilson's tactics represented a significant departure from the norm.

Wilson believed that the seven-shot repeater would transform mounted combat, and he anticipated achieving remarkable success in the field with his thousands of Spencer-equipped troopers.

It's worth noting that Thomas' cavalry commander James Wilson started the war as a Grant protégé but after working under Thomas during those last few months of the war became a big advocate for Thomas.

Wilson’s Raid

Wilson mobilized his 13,480 cavalrymen independently, launching rapid raids against the economic hubs of the Deep South. Notably, regions from central Mississippi to central Georgia remained largely untouched even as the Civil War progressed. As a result, cities such as Selma and Montgomery in Alabama, along with Columbus in Georgia, continued to function as crucial shipping centers and significant sources of Confederate supplies.

Wilson's strategic objectives were twofold: to dismantle this essential supply chain and to thwart any potential Confederate efforts to establish a final stronghold in the region. He bolstered the Cavalry Corps with a substantial influx of remounts—35,000 since early March—alongside necessary equipment, ammunition, and hundreds of Spencer carbines. Wilson believed that the seven-shot repeater would transform mounted combat, and he anticipated achieving remarkable success in the field with his thousands of Spencer-equipped troopers.

He significantly enhanced the Cavalry Corps by introducing a considerable number of remounts—35,000 since early March—along with essential equipment, ammunition, and hundreds of Spencer carbines. On March 22, 1865, Wilson's forces departed from Tennessee and swiftly advanced through Alabama, systematically dismantling railroads, bridges, and factories along their path. By April 2, they had successfully captured Selma, a crucial industrial hub for the Confederacy, after overcoming Forrest’s troops in a fierce confrontation. This victory against Nathan Bedford Forrest, one of the Confederacy's most adept cavalry leaders, effectively diminished Confederate cavalry strength in the area.

The destruction of Selma's foundries, arsenals, and military supplies marked a significant blow to the Confederate war effort. On April 12, Wilson's troops entered Montgomery, Alabama, the former Confederate capital, encountering little resistance. Following this, on April 16, they launched an assault on Columbus, Georgia, seizing the city and obliterating the naval shipyard along with other war-related industries. They also took control of West Point, Georgia, another vital supply center for the Confederacy. Wilson's forces maintained their aggressive campaign until the Confederate surrender in April 1865, capturing Macon, Georgia, on April 20, shortly after the war's official conclusion.

Wilson's Raid emerged as a crucial military initiative towards the end of the Civil War, designed to undermine Confederate resources significantly. This strategic operation dealt a severe blow to the South's remaining military capabilities by targeting and destroying key factories, railroads, and supplies essential to the Confederate effort. The raid hastened the collapse of the Confederacy in the Western Theater and was instrumental in achieving an overall Union victory. It is recognized as one of the most successful cavalry operations executed by Union forces during the war, highlighting their ability to penetrate deep into enemy territory and demonstrating the effectiveness of well-equipped, mobile cavalry units in dismantling Confederate infrastructure and resistance.

Wilson’s relentless cavalry pursuit was by far the longest pursuit of a defeated enemy of a defeated adversary during the Civil War, both in duration and distance. For twelve days, his forces engaged the Confederate rear guard, including encounters with Forrest's cavalry, as they advanced into Alabama. The pursuit was marked by continuous rear guard skirmishes, often occurring in challenging weather conditions and difficult terrain. It was only when the pursuit became untenable that Wilson's cavalry made the decision to return to Nashville.

By the conclusion of the war, the cavalry units under Wilson's command successfully apprehended key figures, including President Davis during his escape attempt and Captain Henry Wirz, the commandant of Andersonville prison. Additionally, Upton played a significant role in capturing Alexander Stephens, further highlighting the effectiveness of their operations. These actions underscored the strategic importance of cavalry in the final stages of the conflict.

 

Implications

Wilson's Corps emerged as a precursor to the highly mobile armored warfare tactics that would define the Twentieth Century. Troops utilized their horses for mobility but typically engaged in combat dismounted, leveraging the advantages of their repeating carbines to enhance their combat effectiveness. Both Wilson and Upton enjoyed distinguished careers after the war, with Upton becoming a military reformer and theorist, while Wilson transitioned into a general, diplomat, and historian. Their innovative concepts laid the groundwork for modern military strategies, influencing the use of combined arms and mobile strike forces that would be pivotal in future conflicts, including those in Europe, Vietnam, and Afghanistan.

After the war, Wilson returned to a career in engineering and railroads. His later career as a division and Corps Commander in the Spanish-American War and the Peking expedition during the Boxer rebellion adds to his very remarkable career.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

The Battle of Shiloh (April 6–7, 1862) almost ended Generals Grant and Sherman's careers. Instead, it is considered their first great victory, a testament to their tenacity and determination.

During the chaotic first day, several Union generals played critical roles in holding defensive positions or delaying the Confederate advance. These efforts helped prevent a total collapse of the Union army and bought time for General Ulysses S. Grant to establish a stronger defensive line near Pittsburg Landing.

Lloyd W Klein here looks at how the battle ended in the final part of the series. Part 1 is here.

Ulysses S. Grant.

Important Union Contributions:

·       Brigadier General Benjamin Prentiss who commanded the 6th Division in the Union center. He was a critical first responder given that his was the most forward division. He would then move to the Hornet’s Nest.

·       Major General John A. McClernand who commanded the 1st Division on the Union right flank. McClernand’s division faced some of the heaviest fighting early in the day as the Confederates launched their surprise attack. Despite being pushed back, McClernand’s forces fought stubbornly, slowing the Confederate advance and preventing an early collapse of the Union right flank.

·       Brigadier General Stephen A. Hurlbut, who commanded the 4th Division.

Hurlbut’s division held a defensive position near the Union left flank, covering the approach to Pittsburg Landing.. His troops absorbed significant Confederate pressure and played a key role in protecting the Union army’s retreat and regrouping efforts.

 

Important Confederate Contributions:

·       Major General Braxton Bragg, commander of a Confederate corps, whose aggressive leadership helped drive the Confederate advance early in the battle. He coordinated several assaults on key Union positions, including the Hornet’s Nest, which was crucial in breaking Union resistance in the center. Bragg’s relentless pressure contributed to the Union army’s retreat toward Pittsburg Landing.

·       Major General William J. Hardee, who commanded the lead Confederate corps.

Hardee’s corps spearheaded the initial Confederate assault at dawn, achieving significant success in surprising and overwhelming the Union front lines. His leadership was instrumental in the early Confederate momentum, driving Union forces back several miles.

·       Major General Leonidas Polk who commanded of a Confederate corps. Polk’s corps provided critical support during the Confederate attacks on the Union right flank. While his contributions were solid, Polk’s performance was less decisive compared to Bragg and Hardee. who were instrumental in executing the Confederate attacks, particularly in the early phases of the battle, and their actions shaped the battlefield dynamics.

           

Hornet’s Nest

A key defensive stand occurred at an area later known as the Hornet’s Nest, where Union forces under Prentiss and Brigadier General W.H.L. Wallace held off repeated Confederate assaults for several hours. This resistance bought critical time for Grant to organize a defensive line near Pittsburg Landing. The Hornet’s Nest was a name given to the area of the Shiloh battlefield where Confederate troops made repeated attacks against Union positions along a small, little-used farm road.. Southern soldiers said the zipping bullets sounded like angry hornets; according to tradition, one man said, "It’s a hornet’s nest in there."

The narrow farm road ambles generally southeast from its junction with the Eastern Corinth Road (Corinth-Pittsburgh Road). Fairly level toward its northwest end, it makes a rather sharp climb up a hill near its center, descending again near the William Manse George cabin and the Peach Orchard. That hill, where Brigadier General Benjamin Prentiss commanded an ad hoc group of regiments, comprises the area of the Hornet’s Nest. To Wallace’s right was a division of Federals under Brig. Gen. W.H. L. Wallace, and to his left was another division under Brig. Gen. Stephen Hurlbut. Wallace held a position stretching along the farm road from the Eastern Cornith Road and up the slope to where Prentiss’s line began. Wallace’s men were in a deep ravine on the east side of the farm road; that area is now known as the Sunken Road. Often, but erroneously, the positions of Wallace and Prentiss are lumped together as the Hornet’s Nest. Confusing matters further is the fact that as the farm road passes over the hill where Prentiss had his command, it is sunken for a portion of its 600-yard length there.

Brigadier General W.H.L. Wallace commanded the 2nd Division. An Illinois volunteer soldier who was a lawyer in his civilian life, I believe a law partner at one time of Abraham Lincoln (they were friends, at least). Coolness under fire leading a brigade as a colonel at Fort Donelson had earned him a promotion to Brigadier General Wallace’s division also played a central role in defending the Hornet’s Nest, fighting alongside Prentiss’s men. Wallace was mortally wounded during the battle, but his leadership and the determination of his troops were crucial in holding the line for much of the day. Charles Ferguson Smith had been the division commander but developed a leg infection just prior to the battle. In fact, he died of it a couple of weeks later. General William HL Wallace took command, and ended up defending the Hornet’s Nest for 6 hours, eventually being killed there.

Wallace commanded the 2nd Division of the Army of the Tennessee. His division formed a critical part of the Union line, holding off repeated Confederate assaults. During the intense fighting in the late afternoon, Wallace was mortally wounded. A bullet struck him in the head as his troops were withdrawing from the Hornet’s Nest. He was left on the battlefield during the Union retreat but was later found alive by Union forces. Wallace was taken to a field hospital, but his injuries were too severe. He died on April 10, 1862, four days after the battle. His death was a significant loss to the Union army, as he was a respected and capable commander.

Benjamin Prentiss commanded the 6th Division of the Army of the Tennessee. Early on Day 1, his division bore the brunt of the Confederate surprise attack. Despite being initially driven back, Prentiss regrouped his forces and established a strong defensive position in the Hornet’s Nest, a dense thicket that became a focal point of the battle. Alongside W.H.L. Wallace, Prentiss held this position for hours, slowing the Confederate advance and buying time for Union forces to reorganize near Pittsburg Landing. Prentiss took full command of the position after Wallace was fatally wounded.  Late in the afternoon, after being surrounded and running low on ammunition, Prentiss and his remaining troops were forced to surrender. Prentiss was taken prisoner along with about 2,200 Union soldiers. Prentiss was held as a prisoner of war until he was exchanged in October 1862. His leadership at the Hornet’s Nest earned him recognition for his bravery, despite his capture.

The defense of the Hornet’s Nest by Prentiss and Wallace delayed the Confederate advance, preventing them from reaching Pittsburg Landing and potentially destroying the Union army on Day 1. While both men suffered tragic outcomes—Prentiss as a prisoner and Wallace from mortal wounds—their actions contributed significantly to the Union’s ability to regroup and ultimately win the battle on Day 2. The Confederate forces launched repeated attacks on this strong Union defensive position, but it took hours and significant effort to overcome it.  General Beauregard has been criticized for his conduct of this aspect of the battle because of the time delay it caused. He could have bypassed the Hornet’s Nest entirely and gone straight for Pittsburg Landing.

After the battle he was considered a hero, having held off the Confederate States Army long enough to allow General Grant to organize a counterattack and win the battle. Grant later played down Prentiss's role in the victory, possibly because of mutual dislike between the two generals. He was exchanged in October 1862.  Prentiss was promoted to major general and served on the court-martial board that convicted Fitz John Porter. His dissenting voice in the final vote damaged his political clout in the Army, and he resigned in 1863.

Colonel Randall L. Gibson commanded a brigade under Bragg. Gibson’s brigade launched multiple assaults on the Hornet’s Nest but was repelled repeatedly with heavy losses. His inability to break the Union line underscored the strength of the Union position and the difficulty of the Confederate task. While Gibson would go on to become a long-serving brigade commander with a solid service record, Braxton Bragg (the man who ordered the repeated charges) would fault him and bring him up on charges after the battle. He had graduated Yale as valedictorian, a member of Skull and Crossbones, and the son of a wealthy plantation owner.  An interesting factoid about Gibson is that his great-great-grandfather was a free man of color whose descendants were able to integrate into Louisiana's white society. He would go on to be the US Senator from Louisiana who was instrumental in ending Reconstruction.

An artillery barrage organized by the Ruggles Brigade ultimately caused the Union line to break and the Union line was broken with units heading to the rear. Ruggles' Battery, not an actual unit but a Napoleonic style Grand Battery collecting numerous artillery units under the direction of Confederate division commander Daniel Ruggles. Brigadier General Daniel Ruggles lined up eleven batteries of cannon (62 in all according to Ruggles, 53 according to other sources) and bombed the hell out of the Union troops for nearly an hour beginning at 4:30 PM on April 6th. At the time, this was the greatest concentration of artillery pieces on a North American battlefield.

An uncoordinated double envelopment was in progress. The Confederates eventually surrounded and overwhelmed the Hornet’s Nest, capturing Prentiss and many of his men. However, the delay proved crucial for the Union. Although Prentiss and most of his men were eventually surrounded and captured, their stubborn defense significantly delayed the Confederate advance, allowing Grant to organize a stronger line closer to Pittsburg Landing.

 

The Death of Albert Sidney Johnston

Johnston  personally led a critical charge during the afternoon, inspiring his troops and helping to push Union forces back. A bullet to the back of his knee killed Johnston, where the popliteal artery is located. This wound should not have resulted in death; a simple tourniquet would have been lifesaving. Unfortunately, the wound went unnoticed until too late.

The death of Albert Sidney Johnston of course was a major event in the war; the Confederate western theater never really found its general. Johnston was shot while leading a charge. Why the commanding general was doing this has been speculated about ever since. His losses at Fort Donelson and Henry, and the criticism following his abandoning Nashville certainly occupied his mind. Johnston was killed by a bullet to the back of his knee, where the popliteal artery is located. Unfortunately, the wound went unnoticed until too late because Johnston had received a wound to that leg in the Mexican War, decreasing his sensation. Meanwhile, the bleeding became severe and filled his boot with blood. Essentially he exsanguinated on the field from what ought to have been a non-fatal wound. This wound should not have resulted in death; a simple tourniquet would have been lifesaving.

 

Lew Wallace

A casualty of a different kind was the Union general Lew Wallace. Wallace took a road that was correct if the lines were where they had been at the start of the day but by the time he arrived, those lines were pushed back and so Wallace was behind enemy lines. Thus, he had to countermarch. He never did arrive on day 1 but he was very effective on day 2. Grant never really forgave him; only in his autobiography, after Wallace died, did Grant recognize that he had misinterpreted the situation. Wallace spent years trying to make up for the supposed error, a theme he used in his famous novel Ben Hur.

Lew Wallace is one of the most interesting men who came out of the war, and we have done extensive challenges on almost every aspect of his life. The nature of the misunderstanding that would change his life forever occurred in a flash: at Crump’s Landing, Grant verbally ordered Wallace to the battlefield but didn’t clearly specify what road to take. Wallace ended up on the wrong one (see map). He never did arrive on day 1 (until 7 pm) and Grant never really forgave him. I have read Wallace’s autobiography, and Grant’s Battles and Leaders article and of course his Memoirs.  It all seems like a mix-up of the kind the fog of war will inevitably produce, and way too complicated to review here. Unquestionably, Grant tried to blame Wallace for his day 1 mishaps for many years. Only in his autobiography, after Wallace died, after the wife of the other General Wallace, Mrs. WHL Wallace, sent Grant information that bore out Lew Wallace’s explanation, did Grant recognize that he had misinterpreted the situation. Wallace spent years trying to make up for the supposed error, which was not really his fault, a theme he used in his famous novel Ben Hur. In the interim, Wallace saved Washington DC at the Battle of Monocacy, served as governor of New Mexico territory, and diplomat to the Ottoman Empire. Ben Hur became one of the best sellers of the century, making Wallace a wealthy man, so he did quite well for himself despite it all. He is one of my favorite Civil War characters. And we are not done with him here either.

 

Evening

Grant’s back was to the river; he could have been entirely destroyed. His defense at Pittsburg Landing in the afternoon of day 1 saved his army. By evening, Grant had established a strong defensive line near Pittsburg Landing, supported by artillery and the Tennessee River. The presence of Union gunboats added firepower, repelling further Confederate advances.  Generals Hurlbut and McClernand contributed to this final defensive stand, ensuring the Union army survived the first day of battle.

General Beauregard, confident in the day’s success, decided to halt the attack for the night, believing the Union army was on the verge of collapse. However, this decision allowed Grant to regroup and prepare for a counterattack.

The first day of Shiloh was chaotic and bloody, with heavy casualties on both sides.

The Confederates had pushed the Union forces back significantly but failed to achieve total victory.  The ferocity of the fighting on Day 1 shocked both sides and marked Shiloh as one of the war’s most brutal battles.

That night, reinforcements from Buell’s Army of the Ohio began arriving, giving Grant the strength to launch a counteroffensive on April 7.

Sherman commanded 5th Division, which was stationed at Shiloh Church on the Union right flank. His division was among the first to face the Confederate onslaught.  Despite being surprised and initially overwhelmed, Sherman quickly rallied his troops and organized a defense to slow the Confederate advance. His division absorbed significant pressure, buying time for other Union units to organize and retreat toward Pittsburg Landing.

Shiloh was quite possibly Sherman's best day of combat command during the war.  After being wounded in Rea Field, he galloped back to his camps and got his brigades in line (some were already up and forming) along a ridge overlooking a creek (variously know as Shiloh Branch, Rhea Creek, or Rea Creek).  He was able to hang on here (joined by one brigade from McClernand on his left) from 7 a.m. until 9:30 or so, repelling a series of uncoordinated single-brigade attacks from four Confederate brigades.  Eventually the position was flanked on the left, and Sherman and McClernand fell back to the Hamburg-Purdy Road.  Between 10:30 and 11:30, this position was attacked by a force that one source characterized as "two-thirds of the Confederate army" and driven back to Jones Field.  Sherman and McClernand then carried out the only Federal counterattack of the day, driving the enemy back before losing steam and retiring back to Jones Field in the early afternoon.  In the middle of the afternoon they retired further, across Tilghman Branch..

Sherman demonstrated remarkable composure under fire, personally leading counterattacks and encouraging his men despite being wounded in the hand and shoulder. His ability to maintain discipline and inspire confidence among his troops helped prevent a total rout of the Union right flank. Sherman worked closely with McClernand, whose division was positioned near his own, to establish a series of defensive lines as they fell back under Confederate pressure. Their combined efforts helped slow the Confederate advance and delayed a complete Union collapse.

As the Union forces were pushed back toward Pittsburg Landing, Sherman played a key role in organizing the final defensive line. His leadership ensured that his battered division held its position, contributing to the Union army’s survival at the end of the first day.

Sherman’s ability to rally his troops under chaotic and dire circumstances demonstrated his leadership skills and earned him forever the trust of General Grant. His actions at Shiloh marked a turning point in his career, proving his capability as a battlefield commander. Grant later praised Sherman’s performance, calling him one of the key figures in preventing the Union army from being destroyed on the first day of the battle.

When Sherman arrived at Grant’s headquarters later that evening, he found the general chewing on a soggy cigar in the rain, which had begun soaking the battlefield. ‘Well, Grant, we’ve had the devil’s own day, haven’t we?’ ‘Yes,’ replied Grant, ‘lick ’em tomorrow, though.’

After making a brief attempt to assail Grant's line behind Dill Creek Branch they retired to the Federal camps for the night.  Polk took his Corps back to their own camps of the previous night; which did not help the Confederate effort on the 7th. They slept on their arms. All of the brigades were entangled and exhausted. Command and control had become weak during the afternoon for this reason. Beauregard had thrown in all of his men, there were no reserve units now. He expected the next morning to be a mop-up operation. He did not anticipate Don Carlos Buell’s Army of the Ohio arrival, nor Lew Wallace’s division., which was now on the field. The Confederate lines had become confused and now they were outnumbered. A dispatch from Colonel Benjamin Hardin Helm led Beauregard to believe that Buell was en route to Decatur, Ala., away from Grant’s army. The report was entirely inaccurate, but Beauregard believed it. Cavalry Colonel Nathan Bedford Forrest had observed Buell’s men crossing the river by ferry. He frantically tried to warn Beauregard, but was unable to locate the Confederate commander.

Lew Wallace arrived on the right between 7:00 p.m. and 7:30 p.m.  On the left, Nelson's Division of Buell's Army was just beginning to cross as the Confederates made their final effort, and finished by 9:00 p.m.  Crittenden was in place by 1:00 a.m., and McCook followed after that. Buell arrived that same evening with nearly 20,000 men. Wallace’s division, consisting of about 5,800 men, was well-rested and unscathed from the previous day’s fighting. These reinforcements completely changed the balance of forces, but Beauregard didn’t know it was happening.

 

The Battle – Day 2

The fortunes of Day 2 went the opposite way. Beauregard’s men were entangled and exhausted. Don Carlos Buell’s Army of the Ohio arrived. But so did Lew Wallace’s division.

General P.G.T. Beauregard had effectively managed the Confederate forces after Johnston’s death, but his decision to halt the attack on the evening of April 6 had significant consequences. He believed the Union army was defeated and delayed further attacks until the next day, giving Grant time to regroup and receive reinforcements.

Overnight, Union reinforcements under General Don Carlos Buell and Lew Wallace arrived, significantly bolstering Union forces. Early on April 7, Union forces launched a coordinated counterattack against the Confederate army, which had been exhausted from the previous day’s fighting. Confederate troops, under General P.G.T. Beauregard (put up stiff resistance but were gradually pushed back.

After failing to reach the battlefield in time on Day 1 due to miscommunication and delays, Wallace’s troops arrived fully intact and ready for action, making a significant contribution to the Union counteroffensive.  His troops were positioned on the Union right flank, where they attacked the Confederate left, putting additional pressure on the exhausted Southern forces. Wallace’s division executed a coordinated attack with other Union forces, pushing the Confederate left flank back. This disrupted the Confederate defensive lines and contributed to their eventual retreat. His troops were instrumental in recapturing ground lost on Day 1, helping secure Union control of the battlefield. Wallace’s arrival helped General Ulysses S. Grant execute a unified counteroffensive across the entire front. Wallace’s division worked in conjunction with Buell’s reinforcements and other Union divisions to overwhelm the Confederates.

The Union counterattacked the morning of day 2. Sherman’s division participated in the Union counteroffensive, helping to drive the Confederate forces back. His troops, though exhausted and bloodied from the previous day’s fighting, played a significant role in regaining lost ground and securing a Union victory. The Union army recaptured lost ground, including areas around Pittsburg Landing. .By afternoon, the Confederate forces, realizing they were outnumbered and outmaneuvered, began retreating toward Corinth, Mississippi.

The Confederate lines had become confused the day before and now they were outnumbered. The Union now had the advantage and pushed the lines back completely beyond where the battle lines had been before the fighting began.

Buell met with Sherman at sunset, and learned that Grant planned to attack at sunrise. An understanding was made that Grant would have the west side of the line, while Buell would plan his own attack on the east side. General Don Carlos Buell’s troops made a critical contribution, no doubt. His added reinforcements helped ensure a Union victory on the battle’s second day when a massive Union counterattack routed Confederate forces. Buell’s soldiers played a key role in the Union counterattack. They attacked the Confederate right flank, forcing the Confederates to stretch their already exhausted lines. This pressure, combined with attacks from other Union forces, gradually drove the Confederates back. Buell’s troops helped stabilize the Union’s left flank, which had been vulnerable on Day 1.Their presence allowed Grant to organize a coordinated assault across the entire line, rather than focusing solely on defense. The fresh energy and discipline of Buell’s troops were instrumental in breaking the Confederate resistance. By mid-afternoon, their efforts contributed to forcing the Confederates into a full retreat, ensuring a Union victory. Buell’s timely arrival and the effectiveness of his troops underscored the importance of reinforcements in Civil War battles, where exhaustion and attrition often determined the outcome. General Buell would later insist that he deserved credit for turning the tide at Shiloh, while others—in particular Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman—argued that his troops ultimately had little effect on the outcome. In summary, both Grant’s and Buell’s armies made important contributions on day 2.

Could Beauregard have won day 2 if he had prepared differently? For many years, this was the conclusion of many historians. Modern historians, such as Cunningham and Daniel, disagree with that assessment. Cunningham wrote that Beauregard's critics ignore "the existing situation on the Shiloh battlefield"—including Confederate disorganization, time before sunset, and Grant's strong position augmented by gunboats. Daniel wrote that the thought that "the Confederates could have permanently breached or pulverized the Federal line in an additional hour or so of piecemeal night assaults simply lacks plausibility." He mentions that it took the Confederates six hours to conquer the Hornet's Nest, and Grant's Last Line was a stronger position. He also cites exhaustion, and low ammunition. Dill Creek Branch would have been a formidable position to capture by tired troops. On April 7, Beauregard attempted to continue offensive operations, but his troops were outnumbered, exhausted, and lacked reinforcements. Recognizing the arrival of Union reinforcements, Beauregard could have shifted to a defensive posture, fortifying positions and conserving his forces for a controlled retreat. This might have minimized casualties and preserved his army for future campaigns. On day 2, the Confederates were outnumbered but had they entrenched and set up a defensive perimeter, they might well have held off the Union counterattack. Beauregard could have ordered a relentless night attack to exploit the disarray in the Union lines. While risky due to exhaustion and poor visibility, this might have prevented Union reinforcements (Buell’s and Wallace’s troops) from stabilizing the Union position overnight. Confederate cavalry under Nathan Bedford Forrest was underutilized during the battle, particularly for reconnaissance and disrupting Union reinforcements. Beauregard could have deployed cavalry more aggressively to harass Buell’s approaching forces or cut off the Union supply lines to Pittsburg Landing. This could have delayed or weakened the Union counteroffensive on Day 2. He could have anticipated Buell’s arrival and adjusted his strategy accordingly, perhaps by retreating under cover of darkness on April 6 to avoid being outflanked and overwhelmed. Finally, his single road route from Corinth was problematic logistically, as ammunition would become depleted.

The Aftermath

Beauregard retreated from the field in the late afternoon and returned to Corinth. The Union Army had recovered all of the ground it had lost on day 1 and swept the field on day 2. Grant did not pursue, in part because his own army was in disarray but also because General Halleck would not allow it. Both sides suffered significant losses, with over 23,000 combined casualties, making Shiloh one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War up to that point. The Union army claimed victory, though at a heavy cost.

The Union had 63,000 men engaged, with 13,000 casualties (1754 killed, 8400 wounded, 2900 captured vs. the Confederates with 40-45,000 men with 10,700 casualties (1728 killed, 8000 wounded, 1000 captured). The Union therefore had more casualties, but on a percentage basis, a slightly lower rate of casualties. The battle demonstrated the brutality of the war and marked a turning point in the Western Theater, giving the Union control of key regions in Tennessee. “Scareder than I was at Shiloh” The battle remains famous for the brutal fighting, the high casualties on both sides, and the evidence that the war was going to be a long one. At that time, this battle had more American casualties than every prior war combined! Yet by the end of the war, this battle barely made the top ten list.

General Grant initially was the recipient of an outpouring of public support at first, hailed as a hero of a great battle. The perception of Grant as a drunkard was utilized to explain the horrific losses suffered at the Battle of Shiloh by officers jealous of Grant’s rapid rise. Newspaper reports critical of Grant’s command were intended to increase sales, if not influence the political debate, after the shocking casualties of that bloody battle. Shocked by the casualties of what, up to that point, was the war’s bloodiest battle, newspaper reporters wrote articles critical of Grant’s command. These criticisms fed the rumors that Grant, who many believed had been forced out of the pre-war Army because of alcohol consumption, had been caught drunk and off guard by Confederate General Albert Sydney Johnston’s surprise attack. The losses suffered by both sides at Shiloh had more to do with the nature of nineteenth-century warfare than the nature of Grant’s relationship with liquor, but rumors of his affection for spirits now became generally accepted.

Whitelaw Reid, Cincinnati Gazette, reported the events of the battle incorrectly, stating that Grant had been taken by surprise at Shiloh and that soldiers had been bayonetted in their tents. This myth persists to this day.  The high casualty rate at Shiloh was related to the intensity of the battle, not the nature of Grant’s problems with liquor, but rumors of his drinking increased.

Halleck arrived at Pittsburg Landing on April 11 and took personal command—as he had planned earlier. On April 30, he named Grant as his second-in-command. This was a meaningless position, but Halleck's solution to the Grant criticism was a de facto suspension that satisfied the critics. Some of the more "savage denunciations" of Grant came from politicians representing Ohio and Iowa. One politician complained to Lincoln, saying Grant was an incompetent drunk that was a political liability. Lincoln's response was "I can't spare this man; he fights."

On April 8, Confederate President Jefferson Davis reported to the Confederate congress that Johnston had gained a complete victory. A last-minute addition to his speech mentioned Johnston's death. Before the battle, the public had wanted Johnston removed because of the loss of most of Tennessee. Now he was a hero. Over the next few days, more information about the battle became available. The initial perception was that only "untoward events" had saved the Union army from destruction, and the withdrawal to Corinth was part of a strategic plan. Eventually, critics began to blame Beauregard for the defeat, citing the lack of a twilight attack on the first day of the battle.

The perception of Grant as a drunkard was utilized to explain the horrific losses suffered at the Battle of Shiloh by officers jealous of Grant’s rapid rise. Newspaper reports  critical of Grant’s command were intended to increase sales, if not influence the political debate, after the shocking casualties of that bloody battle. Shocked by the casualties of what up to that point was the war’s bloodiest battle, newspaper reporters wrote articles critical of Grant’s command. These criticisms fed the rumors that Grant, who many believed had been forced out of the pre-war Army because of alcohol consumption, had been caught drunk and off guard by Confederate General Albert Sydney Johnston’s surprise attack. The losses suffered by both sides at Shiloh had more to do with the nature of nineteenth-century warfare than the nature of Grant’s relationship with liquor, but rumors of his affection for spirits now became generally accepted.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content for over 12 years. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

 

 

Further Reading

·       Daniel, Larry J. (1997). Shiloh: The Battle That Changed the Civil War. New York City: Simon & Schuster.

·       James M McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1988.

·       Shelby Foote, The Civil War: A Narrative. Volumes 1-3. Random House, 1963.

·       Ulysses S Grant, The Autobiography of General Ulysses S Grant: Memoirs of the Civil War. Accessed at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4367/4367-h/4367-h.htm

·       William T Sherman, Memoirs of General William T Sherman. Accessed at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4361/4361-h/4361-h.htm

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/shiloh

·       http://www.npshistory.com/publications/civil_war_series/22/sec11.htm

·       https://www.historynet.com/battle-of-shiloh-the-devils-own-day/

·       https://www.historynet.com/battle-of-shiloh/

·       https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/was-general-grant-surprised-by-the-confederate-attack-at-shiloh.htm

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/battle-shiloh-shattering-myths

The Battle of Shiloh (April 6–7, 1862) almost ended Generals Grant and Sherman's careers. Instead, it is considered their first great victory, a testament to their tenacity and determination.

General PGT Beauregard planned a surprise advance and attack at Pittsburg Landing, on the west bank of the Tennessee River. On the first day, the Confederate Army routed the Union Army and only tenacious defense saved the day. On the second day, Union reinforcements and Rebel confusion led to a complete reversal of the fortunes of day 1.

Lloyd W Klein explains in part 1 in this series.

Battle of Shiloh by Thure de Thulstrup.


Planning and Strategy

Maj Gen Don Carlos Buell and the Army of the Ohio had taken Nashville in February 1862. He was able to claim the city with minimal effort in February 1862, and was promoted to major general shortly thereafter. In March 1862 General Henry Halleck ordered Buell to move south to rendezvous with General Ulysses S. Grant and the Army of the Tennessee at Pittsburg Landing, TN. Union leadership realized that its troops were too spread out, so it was decided to concentrate the troops. Recognizing this impending combining of forces, the Confederates were compelled to act.

After the losses at Forts Henry and Donelson and the abandonment of Nashville, the various Rebel armies converged on Corinth, Mississippi. This was a malarial-infested river town and a poor location for a retreating army.  However, Corinth was the junction of 2 major railroads, the Memphis & Charleston RR and the Mobile & Ohio RR, and hence was a critical railroad crossroads, it was a convenient place to concentrate. Johnston’s command had only about 17,000 troops, so he joined his forces with those under General Polk. Because of Corinth’s centrality, he was able to gather 40-45,000 troops. This was probably sufficient to face Grant alone, who had about 48,000, but not combined with Buell., with an additional 18-20,000. Hence, a pre-emptive action to prevent their joining was a necessity.

Exactly how involved Albert Sidney Johnston was in planning the attack is controversial; it has been suggested that he was totally out of his depth and that Beauregard both planned and led the attack. The broad concept was to attack Grant before Buell joined him. Another error was that the rains had slowed travel from their base in Corinth.  Had they arrived a day sooner General Buell might not have gotten there in time for day 2.

General Charles Ferguson Smith was at the time commander of the Union Army, as Halleck tried to dump Grant behind the scenes. Sherman went upstream with his division to raid the Memphis & Charleston RR, but on the way noted Pittsburg Landing and sent a recommendation to Smith that he occupy it. Smith sent Hurlbut, who occupied the landing. Upon Sherman's return from his unsuccessful raid, he landed there, decided the ground was good, and took charge of the forces around the landing and occupied Shiloh Church, on the west bank. Grant probably made an error in setting up camp on the side of the river closest to the known position of the Confederate Army. Grant’s back was to the river, and he could have been destroyed.

Sherman had set up camp around the Shiloh Church. Grant probably made an error in setting up camp on the side of the river closest to the known position of the Confederate Army. Grant’s back was to the river, and he could have been entirely destroyed. Pittsburg Landing is nine miles upriver (south) of Savannah, and it had a road that led to Corinth, Mississippi. About three miles inland from the landing was a log church named Shiloh (a Hebrew word meaning "place of peace”.  It seemed like a good choice at the time because it was away from the river and on land that was well-drained and open. The area that would become the Shiloh battlefield was somewhat shaped like a triangle, with the sides formed by various creeks and the Tennessee River. The land was mostly wooded, with scattered cotton fields, peach orchards, and a few small structures.

The stealthiness of Beauregard's plan depended on speed. The march from Corinth is less than 20 miles and should have taken trained troops one day to approach and form for an assault. The rebel troops were untrained, to put it mildly, and the march took 3 days. Beauregard's biggest mistake in planning was the initial formation with each Corps spread across the front one behind the other. Commanding such a formation on a Corps level was impossible and not long after the jump off command responsibilities were separated in a more logical distribution of authority. Since the rebels were so untrained, Corps level identity wasn't strong. Beauregard underestimated the length of time to march from their camps to the area of Pittsburgh Landing.  This resulted in many of their troops not having enough rations and they then stopped their initially successful assault in order to feast at the Union campsites. Another error was that the rains had slowed travel from their base in Corinth.  Had they arrived a day sooner Buell might not have gotten there in time for day 2. In fact, the whole idea was to attack Grant before Buell joined him.

No one in the Union Army expected Beauregard to suddenly appear on their south flank. The divisions of Sherman and Prentiss were the least experienced, so when they bolted, it seemed to be a general retreat. Sherman had heard the reports of enemy soldiers in the area but he was concerned that if he entrenched, it would be viewed that his “insanity” regarding the war had returned so he ignored it. The lack of entrenchments was a distinct disadvantage for the Union troops and made the battle a "stand-up" fight for most of the day.

The camp alignment was designed for camping convenience and contributed to a more or less piecemeal resistance at first, but did help in a "defense-in-depth" resistance to the Confederate onslaught. Also having Sherman at the front right from the beginning turned out to be fortunate.

Every West Point trained officer (Halleck , Grant, Smith, Sherman, and McPherson) believed that Johnston and Beauregard would hold their troops behind the Corinth entrenchments and await the Union Army. Every day there were orders from Halleck in St Louis to Grant for him NOT to bring on a battle by any aggressive moves.

 

Order of Battle

Union Army

Major General Halleck served as the Commander of the Department of the West, with his headquarters located in St. Louis. A member of the Democratic Party, Halleck's intellectual approach contrasted sharply with that of his predecessor, Fremont. Although he was known for his cautious demeanor and did not fully endorse Grant's aggressive tactics, President Lincoln urged him to devise an offensive strategy. It is possible that Halleck harbored some distrust towards Grant, and perhaps even felt envious of the latter's achievements up to that point.

Major General Ulysses S. Grant held the position of commander for the District of West Tennessee and the XIII Corps, operating from the field. After being released from what could be described as house arrest at Fort Henry, he arrived in Savannah, Tennessee, on March 23, 1862. Grant assumed the role of Senior Officer Present (SOP) for the Tennessee River Expedition, which is often referred to as either the Army of the Tennessee or simply Grant's Army. He established his headquarters at the Cherry House, situated on a ridge overlooking Savannah. Following his victories at Fort Henry and Fort Donelson, Grant was promoted to Major General. However, Halleck had recently removed him from field command of the expedition after Grant left his district to meet Buell in Nashville, failed to report on his troop strength, and allegedly did not promptly halt looting at the captured forts. It was later revealed that Halleck's inquiries regarding Grant's forces had not reached him.

Halleck also mentioned concerns about rumors of Grant's potential return to alcohol consumption but ultimately reinstated him to field command. This decision may have been influenced by pressure from Lincoln and the War Department. When Halleck communicated the reinstatement to Grant, he framed it as an effort to rectify an injustice, omitting the fact that the initial injustice had originated with him. In response to Grant's letter expressing concern about possible adversaries between them, Halleck assured him, "You are mistaken. There is no enemy between you and me."

Major General Don Carlos Buell served as the Commander of the Department of the Ohio and the Army of the Ohio, although he held a junior rank compared to General Grant based on their respective dates of appointment. Following the capture of Fort Donelson, Buell's command was placed under the authority of General Halleck, who subsequently ordered him to advance from Nashville to Savannah. By April 1, 1862, Buell's leading division, under the command of Brigadier General Nelson, was still a week away from reaching Savannah. Buell, who had recently transitioned from being Halleck's equal to a subordinate, was recognized for his exceptional organizational skills, making Halleck's decision to assign him to this task a prudent one. In November 1861, Buell was dispatched to the Western Theater of the war in Kentucky, where he took command of the Army of the Ohio. He received directives from President Abraham Lincoln and General George B. McClellan to launch an invasion into eastern Tennessee. However, citing insufficient transportation for his large force of over 50,000 troops, Buell opted to advance on Nashville instead, capturing the city with relative ease in February 1862, which led to his promotion to major general shortly thereafter.

The next in seniority, Major General John McClernand, served as the commander of the 1st Division but had been assigned the role of garrison commander at Savannah. Following him in the chain of command was Major General C.F. Smith, who, while serving as a division commander, took on the responsibilities of the Tennessee River Expedition Commander during a period when Grant was occupied at Fort Henry and McClernand was relegated to garrison duties. Unfortunately, Smith became incapacitated due to a leg injury sustained while attempting to board a rowboat, which prevented him from participating in the Battle of Shiloh. He ultimately succumbed to an infection and dysentery a few weeks later, leading to Brigadier General William H.L. Wallace taking over his position.

Brigadier General William T. Sherman commanded a newly formed division. He was positioned as the forward leader of the Expedition at the Pittsburgh Landing campsite. Previously, Sherman led the 5th Division, but his pessimistic outlook on the war resulted in a breakdown that necessitated a brief leave of absence. After recovering, he established a strong partnership with Grant that would ultimately change the course of the war. At this moment, he was commander of a division under Grant.

 

The next most senior officer, Major General Lew Wallace, serves as a division commander and is stationed at Crumps Landing, located just upstream from Savannah. The other division commander under Grant's command was Benjamin Prentiss, who led the 6th division.

 

Confederate Army

Albert Sidney Johnston was a respected officer in the antebellum army, and his decision to join the Confederacy was seen as a significant advantage for the South. A West Point graduate, he gained recognition as a hero during the Mexican War. He rose to the rank of colonel in the distinguished 2nd US Cavalry, where Robert E. Lee served as his lieutenant colonel, and notable figures such as William Hardee and George Thomas held the rank of major. At the onset of the Civil War, Johnston was in command of the Department of the Pacific, which led President Davis to appoint him as a full general, placing him second in seniority, just behind Samuel Cooper. Subsequently, he was assigned to lead the western theater of operations. Following Zollicoffer’s defeat at Mill Springs, Davis appointed PGT Beauregard to serve under Johnston. However, the setbacks at Fort Henry, Fort Donelson, and Nashville raised concerns regarding Johnston's effectiveness. His tenure was marked by a mix of successes and failures; he took command in Tennessee in September 1861 after Polk's breach of Kentucky's neutrality and occupation of Columbus, Kentucky. From his base in Bowling Green, Kentucky, he projected a strong front that unsettled both Major General Robert Anderson and Brigadier General Sherman, who were in charge of the Department of the Ohio, while the current commander, Major General Buell, adopted a notably cautious approach. Nevertheless, Johnston's oversight of the river forts along the Cumberland and Tennessee rivers was lacking, allowing Grant's Tennessee River Expedition to capture both forts and Nashville.

PGT Beauregard stepped down from his position as commandant at West Point to take charge of Charleston Harbor, where he oversaw the bombardment of Fort Sumter and the events at the First Battle of Manassas.

The organizational structure of the Confederate army included the First Corps under Leonidas Polk, the Second Corps led by Braxton Bragg, the Third Corps commanded by William Hardee, and the Reserve Corps under John C. Breckinridge. This assembly essentially represented a reunion of the US 2nd Cavalry, orchestrated by Secretary of War Jefferson Davis, who was joined by the former Vice President of the United States. This alignment was likely intentional, as Davis had been preparing for the impending conflict long before it officially commenced.

The Battle – Day 1

Beauregard underestimated the time necessary to march from their camps outside of Corinth to the area of Pittsburgh Landing.  This resulted in many of their troops not having enough rations. One consequence was that after their initially successful assault, the Confederate forces halted to feast at the Union campsites.

Surprise Attack

Strategically, the rebel assault was definitely a surprise, but tactically it was most assuredly NOT a surprise. Like calling Gettysburg a meeting engagement, it depends on exactly what we mean by the word “surprise”. There was no prepared defensive line and no entrenchments, and no one expected an attack or a battle in that location. Only a few pickets were in place. So from a preparedness perspective, it was a surprise. But there had been a minor skirmish on April 4th. There were myriad reports of Confederates in the area.

At midnight April 5, Colonel Peabody ordered Major James E. Powell to take three companies of the 25th Missouri Infantry Regiment, and two companies of the 12th Michigan Infantry Regiment, on a reconnaissance to Seay Field. Around 5 am, Confederate pickets fired at Powell’s men. When Powell advanced into Fraley’s Field, he ran into Major Hardcastle’s 3rd Mississippi Battalion. When General Johnston heard the sounds of battle, he gave Beauregard a fateful order. Meanwhile, Powell sent back word that he had run into a Confederate force of several thousand. When Prentiss heard this report, he had an odd response. Sherman also had a weird response until an event occurred he could not ignore.

Colonel Everett Peabody had ordered a reconnaissance by 3 companies at midnight on April 5 and a sighting was made. That was when the battle began. Colonel Everett Peabody of the 25th Missouri was a new brigade commander in General Prentiss' new division and were the most southerly camped troops near the Shiloh branch Creek. Because of many days of encountering rebels in the woods and on the roads by pickets and cavalry, Colonel Peabody was very nervous and worried on the night of April 5 into the early morning of April 6. About 1:00 am Peabody sent out Major James Powell of the 25th with a small patrol that soon returned with word he had encountered Confederate pickets very close. Peabody organized a larger patrol and they went out at 3:00am. Powell found Hindman's Confederate division advancing and attacked. One of the ironies of Shiloh was that this large battle began with an attack by Union soldiers. Eventually Powell figured the rebels were too strong and began a fighting withdrawal back to the Union camps. Prentiss at first was outraged that Peabody had provoked an attack unordered, But then realized what it meant.  And Peabody basically saved the Union army by giving them time to prepare. Sherman didn’t believe it until he went forward to see for himself and was wounded slightly while an aide was killed.

At 5:30 am, Johnston ordered a general attack but it took at least 2 hours to organize and even then the alignment was off axis. Hardee and Bragg began the assault with a 3 mile wide line. At 7:30 am, the corps of Polk and Breckinridge moved forward on the flanks, extending the line and causing intermixing of commands. In essence the attack was one very long frontal attack. The idea was to drive the Union camps back to Owl Creek, away from the river (NOT into it, which is a common misconception), which should have meant an attack primarily on the Union left.

At dawn, Confederate forces under General Albert Sidney Johnston and General P.G.T. Beauregard launched a surprise attack on Union troops encamped near Pittsburg Landing in southwestern Tennessee. Johnston aimed to defeat the Union army before reinforcements under General Don Carlos Buell could arrive.

The firing became almost continuous and swelled so Peabody, Sherman, Prentiss, and their men knew something big was happening, but Prentiss and Sherman needed a little more persuading.

Grant maintained in his Memoirs that it was not a surprise attack.  The northern newspapers exaggerated the nature of the surprise at the time; indeed the Union did not entrench but Sherman had been forewarned and elements of the Union army found the southern lines quite soon. Halleck would help Grant cover for whatever surprise it was, in large part because it was a victory in the end. Of course, this view was beneficial to Grant, and also to Halleck at the time, to keep themselves from being embarrassed, or even relieved of command.  It is still controversial whether or not Union soldiers were really bayoneted in their tents and shot in their underwear as was reported in the papers, but most modern accounts say that was an exaggeration.

Grant was having breakfast in Savannah. When he heard the sounds of battle, he ordered General Nelson forward, took his steamboat to Crump’s Landing where he ordered Lew Wallace to prepare to move. then got to Pittsburg Landing at about 9am. He was on crutches, as he had fallen from his horse recently.

The Union forces were caught off guard, with many soldiers still in their tents or eating breakfast when the attack began. The Confederate assault overwhelmed the Union front lines, pushing them back toward the Tennessee River.

The Union army, spread across multiple camps, was unprepared for the intensity of the attack. Many units were quickly overrun, and disorganized Union troops retreated in panic.

The nature of the surprise was exaggerated by the northern newspapers at the time; the Union did not entrench, but General Sherman had been forewarned and elements of the Union army found the southern lines quite soon after their arrival. Despite being routed early, Sherman showed tenacity and skill despite adversity on the first day, proving to himself and to others that he had the emotional and cognitive skills necessary to lead an army.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content for over 12 years. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

 

 

Further Reading:

·       Daniel, Larry J. (1997). Shiloh: The Battle That Changed the Civil War. New York City: Simon & Schuster.

·       James M McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1988.

·       Shelby Foote, The Civil War: A Narrative. Volumes 1-3. Random House, 1963.

·       Ulysses S Grant, The Autobiography of General Ulysses S Grant: Memoirs of the Civil War. Accessed at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4367/4367-h/4367-h.htm

·       William T Sherman, Memoirs of General William T Sherman. Accessed at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4361/4361-h/4361-h.htm

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/civil-war/battles/shiloh

·       http://www.npshistory.com/publications/civil_war_series/22/sec11.htm

·       https://www.historynet.com/battle-of-shiloh-the-devils-own-day/

·       https://www.historynet.com/battle-of-shiloh/

·       https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/was-general-grant-surprised-by-the-confederate-attack-at-shiloh.htm

·       https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/battle-shiloh-shattering-myths

The Crimean War (1853–1856) is often remembered for the infamous Charge of the Light Brigade, the pioneering efforts of Florence Nightingale, and the brutal conditions suffered by soldiers on all sides. However, its true significance extends far beyond these well-known episodes. As the final instalment in this series, we examine how the war shaped future conflicts, modern medical practices, political realignments, and cultural legacies. The Crimean War was a crucible of change, marking a transition from traditional to modern warfare and leaving an enduring impact on global history.

Terry Bailey explains.

Read part 1 in the series here, part 2 here, part 3 here, and part 4 here.

A Russian Emancipation Reform took place in 1861. The above painting is Peasants Reading the Emancipation Manifesto, an 1873 painting by Grigory Myasoyedov.

A catalyst for future conflicts

The Crimean War foreshadowed many aspects of later conflicts, particularly the American Civil War (1861–1865) and the First World War (1914–1918). Tactical developments, such as the use of rifled firearms, improved artillery, and early trench warfare, highlighted the obsolescence of Napoleonic-era battle strategies. The war also underscored the importance of logistics, supply lines, and rail transport, elements that would become central to modern warfare.

For the American Civil War, the Crimean War offered key lessons in battlefield medicine, military organization, and the use of industrial technology in war. Notably, Union and Confederate forces adopted the rifled musket and the Minié ball, both of which had proven devastating in Crimea. Additionally, the use of railways to transport troops and supplies became a strategic necessity in the American conflict.

During the First World War, echoes of the Crimean War were unmistakable. Trench warfare, extensive use of artillery bombardments, and the difficulties of siege warfare at Sevastopol found eerie parallels on the Western Front. Furthermore, the Crimean War demonstrated the importance of alliances and diplomacy, a factor that would play a crucial role in shaping the alliances of 1914.

 

The war's role in modern medical practices

Perhaps one of the most enduring legacies of the Crimean War is its impact on medical care. The appalling conditions in field hospitals, where infections ran rampant and sanitation was virtually nonexistent, led to a medical revolution spearheaded by figures such as Florence Nightingale and Mary Seacole. Nightingale's implementation of hygiene protocols, improved ventilation, and systematic patient care dramatically reduced mortality rates.

The war also highlighted the need for organized battlefield nursing, paving the way for the establishment of professional nursing as a respected vocation. Nightingale's work influenced the founding of the modern military medical corps and laid the groundwork for the Geneva Conventions and the Red Cross movement.

 

Political fallout for Russia and the Ottoman Empire

The Treaty of Paris (1856) ended the Crimean War but left deep political wounds, particularly for Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Russia, previously regarded as an unstoppable force in Eastern Europe, suffered a humiliating defeat that exposed its military and logistical shortcomings.

The war spurred Tsar Alexander II to initiate the Great Reforms, including the emancipation of the serfs in 1861 and the modernization of the Russian military. These reforms, while significant, also sowed the seeds of future unrest and revolution.

For the Ottoman Empire, the war briefly strengthened its position as a European power, but it also underscored its dependence on British and French support. The empire's chronic instability and economic weaknesses persisted, contributing to its gradual decline and eventual collapse in the early 20th century.

 

Enduring cultural legacy

The Crimean War left an indelible mark on literature, art, and memorial culture. Alfred, Lord Tennyson's poem The Charge of the Light Brigade immortalized the tragic heroism of British cavalrymen, ensuring that their doomed advance remained a symbol of both courage and folly.

Meanwhile, artists such as Roger Fenton pioneered war photography, providing some of the first visual records of conflict and shaping public perceptions of war.

Memorials to the Crimean War can be found across Europe, particularly in Britain, where statues, plaques, and monuments honor the sacrifices of soldiers. The war's legacy also persists in the many place names and military traditions inspired by its battles and leaders.

 

The transition to modern warfare

The Crimean War marked a crucial shift from traditional to modern warfare. The use of industrial technology, the importance of logistics, and the role of the press in shaping public opinion all foreshadowed conflicts to come. It was one of the first wars to be extensively covered by newspapers, influencing government decisions and public sentiment in a manner that would become standard in later wars.

Moreover, the Crimean War demonstrated that war was no longer solely about battlefield heroics; it was about endurance, supply chains, and public perception. It highlighted the growing importance of infrastructure, railways, telegraphs, and steam-powered ships, which would become indispensable in future conflicts.

Needless to say, the Crimean War was far more than a conflict of empires vying for influence; it was a turning point in the evolution of warfare, medicine, politics, and culture. It heralded the twilight of the old world and the dawn of a new era defined by industrialized conflict, strategic alliances, and the inexorable advance of technology.

The echoes of Sevastopol's sieges, the lessons learned in battlefield medicine, and the political upheavals it triggered all reverberated through the decades, shaping the course of history in ways its contemporaries could scarcely have imagined.

Militarily, the war exposed the obsolescence of outdated tactics and underscored the necessity of logistical efficiency, mechanized transport, and advanced weaponry, principles that would dominate future conflicts from the American Civil War to the mechanized horrors of the 20th century.

In medicine, it catalyzed a transformation that saved countless lives in subsequent wars, institutionalizing sanitation, organized nursing, and the professionalization of medical care. Politically, it reshaped the balance of power in Europe, compelling Russia to modernize, hastening the Ottoman Empire's decline, and reinforcing the precedent that alliances could determine the fate of nations.

Culturally, it imprinted itself onto literature, photography, and collective memory, immortalizing both its tragedies and its triumphs.

Ultimately, the Crimean War stands as a watershed moment in global history, a conflict fought with the weapons of the past and present, therefore, bearing the hallmarks of the future. It was a war that reshaped the world, not only through the treaties that concluded it but through the profound and lasting transformations it set in motion.

The shadows of Crimea stretched far beyond the battlefields of the 1850s, lingering in the wars, politics, and medical advancements that followed, ensuring that its legacy endures to this day.

 

The site has been offering a wide variety of high-quality, free history content since 2012. If you’d like to say ‘thank you’ and help us with site running costs, please consider donating here.

 

 

Notes

 

The Geneva Conventions

The Geneva Conventions, the cornerstone of modern humanitarian law, have their origins in the mid-19th century, with their development significantly influenced by the horrors of the Crimean War (1853–1856).

This conflict, exposed severe deficiencies in battlefield medical care and the treatment of wounded soldiers, highlighting the need for international humanitarian protection.

As indicated in the main text the Crimean War was one of the first major conflicts in which mass media, particularly war correspondents and photographers, brought the suffering of soldiers to public attention.

Reports from the front lines described appalling conditions, with thousands of wounded left untreated due to a lack of medical personnel and supplies. The work of figures such as Florence Nightingale and others, who revolutionized military medical care and nursing by improving sanitation and organizing hospitals, underscored the desperate need for standardized and humane treatment of the wounded.

The inefficiency and suffering witnessed during the war deeply influenced the movement towards formalized humanitarian protections. Swiss humanitarian Henry Dunant, inspired by similar horrors he observed during the Battle of Solferino (1859), took up the cause of improving battlefield medical care.

His 1862 book, A Memory of Solferino, argued for the establishment of a neutral medical organization to aid wounded soldiers regardless of nationality. This led to the creation of the International Committee of the Red Cross in 1863 and, a year later, the signing of the First Geneva Convention in 1864.

While the Geneva Conventions were not directly a product of the Crimean War, the lessons of that conflict, especially the need for better medical care and organized humanitarian efforts, greatly contributed to the momentum that led to their establishment.